From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
<david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "Tyler Retzlaff" <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 13:41:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D8762F@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7gKgZoMOcHVZ+NQ@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, 6 January 2023 12.48
>
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 04:32:40PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 09:21:18 -0800
> > Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 10:01:31AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > 05/01/2023 08:09, Morten Brørup:
> > > > > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roretzla@linux.microsoft.com]
> > > > > > +/**
> > > > > > + * @warning
> > > > > > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change, or be removed,
> without prior
> > > > > > notice
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * Get the count of leading 0-bits in v.
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * @param v
> > > > > > + * The value.
> > > > > > + * @return
> > > > > > + * The count of leading zero bits.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +__rte_experimental
> > > > > > +static inline unsigned int
> > > > > > +rte_clzl(unsigned long v)
> > > > >
> > > > > Don't use l (long) and ll (long long) for names (and types),
> use explicit bit lengths, 32 and 64.
> > > > >
> > > > > E.g.: rte_clz32(uint32_t v)
> > > >
> > > > I agree on using numbers.
> > > >
> > >
> > > love the idea, fewer functions too.
> > >
> > > though it is a shame we cannot adopt C11 standard because we could
> just
> > > do away with the bit suffixes entirely.
> >
> > We could but the project needs to support older RHEL releases
> > which have older tool sets. Though probably this is moot point given
> > how much meson seems to change.
>
> True, though meson tends to be a bit easier to update than GCC on a
> system
> - no "pip3 install --upgrade gcc", sadly :-)
>
> If we can't go all the way to C11 support, how about at least going to
> C99
> support? As far as I know DPDK has never updated its minimum C-standard
> version, and it might be a good idea to start the process of doing so,
> even
> if it is a baby step.
>
> /Bruce
The DPDK Getting Started Guide [1] says:
"Required Tools and Libraries:
[...]
a supported C compiler such as gcc (version 4.9+)"
GCC version 4.9 supports C11 [2]:
"GCC 4.9 Changes: "ISO C11 support is now at a similar level of completeness to ISO C99 support [...]"
So why are we not going to support C11?
Probably because of RHEL 7, which only provides GCC 4.8 [3].
RHEL 7 was released for GA on June 10, 2014 [4]. If someone has a server with a nine year old distro still used in production, it is probably because it is running some legacy application, which is difficult to get up and running on a newer distro. Partial conclusion: RHEL 7 is probably still widely used in production.
However, I have a hard time understanding why anyone would build and/or deploy a brand new DPDK application (based on DPDK 23.03) on such a server. Can someone please justify this?
Are we really going to postpone C11 support in DPDK until June 30, 2026, when RHEL 7 ends its Extended Life Cycle Support [4]?
If so, then the GCC version mentioned in the DPDK Getting Started Guide should be corrected accordingly.
[1]: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/linux_gsg/sys_reqs.html#compilation-of-the-dpdk
[2]: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/C11Status
[3]: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/19458
[4]: https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata#Life_Cycle_Dates
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-06 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-23 22:14 [PATCH 0/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count Tyler Retzlaff
2022-11-23 22:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-03 21:46 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-11-23 22:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] test/bitcount: add bitcount tests Tyler Retzlaff
2022-11-23 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count Tyler Retzlaff
2022-11-23 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2022-11-24 10:17 ` Morten Brørup
2022-11-28 17:13 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-11-28 17:22 ` Morten Brørup
2022-11-28 17:27 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-05 9:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-05 17:23 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-05 17:27 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-05 20:57 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-05 21:34 ` Morten Brørup
2023-01-05 22:06 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-05 23:10 ` Morten Brørup
2023-01-06 1:04 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-06 10:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-06 10:00 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-05 7:09 ` Morten Brørup
2023-01-05 9:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-05 17:21 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-06 0:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-01-06 11:48 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-01-06 12:41 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2023-01-06 13:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-06 18:58 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-06 20:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-10 9:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-06 18:47 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-09 8:50 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-04-04 21:23 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-05 8:44 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-04-05 15:22 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-05 15:51 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-04-05 17:25 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-11-23 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] test/bitcount: add bitcount tests Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-04 23:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-09 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-09 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: move bit operation functions from common to bitops header Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 13:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-09 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 13:55 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-10 17:34 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 18:37 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 13:56 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-06 22:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-06 22:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] eal: move bit functions from common to bitops header Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-06 22:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-06 22:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] test/bitcount: add bitcount tests Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-07 8:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-09 16:57 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-09 17:26 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-07 13:40 ` Morten Brørup
2023-01-09 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count Bruce Richardson
2023-01-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] eal: move bit operation common to bitops header Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 19:46 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 19:46 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] eal: move bit operation common to bitops header Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 19:46 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-20 22:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-02 9:14 ` David Marchand
2023-02-02 10:56 ` David Marchand
2023-02-02 15:57 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-03 9:14 ` David Marchand
2023-02-02 15:56 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-03 9:21 ` David Marchand
2023-04-01 0:45 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] eal: provide abstracted bit counting functions Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-01 0:45 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] eal: move bit count functions to bitops header Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-01 0:45 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] eal: provide abstracted bit count functions Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-01 0:45 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] pipeline: add include of bitops Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-01 0:45 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] maintainers: add bitcount test under EAL API and common code Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-01 7:08 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] eal: provide abstracted bit counting functions Morten Brørup
2023-04-04 0:11 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-04 0:11 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] eal: move bit count functions to bitops header Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-04 0:11 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] eal: provide abstracted bit count functions Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-04 0:11 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] maintainers: add bitcount test under EAL API and common code Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-04 8:27 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] eal: provide abstracted bit counting functions Bruce Richardson
2023-08-25 8:41 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D8762F@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).