From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "Ben Magistro" <koncept1@gmail.com>
Cc: "Honnappa Nagarahalli" <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"Tyler Retzlaff" <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
<thomas@monjalon.net>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
<david.marchand@redhat.com>, <jerinj@marvell.com>,
<konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>, <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
"nd" <nd@arm.com>, <techboard@dpdk.org>,
"Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] eal: introduce atomics abstraction
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 18:49:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87739@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKx8PBgY_cQUhkxCrbOgeffKKrQewWqvQyG-aMLEbF8WoqriPA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1785 bytes --]
Hi Ben,
Only bug fixes are backported to LTS. Not even new NIC drivers are backported.
Reference: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/stable.html#what-changes-should-be-backported <https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/stable.html#what-changes-should-be-backported>
-Morten
From: Ben Magistro [mailto:koncept1@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2023 17.47
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:55 AM Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 10:28:40AM -0500, Ben Magistro wrote:
> There is a thread discussing a change to the standard [1] but I have
> not seen anything explicit yet about moving to C11. I am personally in
> favor of making the jump to C11 now as part of the 23.x branch and
> provided my thoughts in the linked thread (what other projects using
> DPDK have as minimum compiler requirements, CentOS 7 EOL dates).
> Is the long term plan to backport this change set to the existing LTS
> release or is this meant to be something introduced for use in 23.x and
> going forward? I think I was (probably naively) assuming this would be
> a new feature in the 23.x going forward only.
> [1] [1]http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2023-February/262188.html
>
We don't bump requirements for older LTS releases, so any change to minimum
required versions would only be for the 23.x series releases
I meant the atomics change set, I should have been clearer in that question, my apologies. If the atomic work is planned to be backported, the question of if/when the C11 standard would be adopted seems less relevant since it would need to be supported for DPDK versions that do not have the C11 standard requirement too.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5507 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-13 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-12 21:26 [PATCH] eal: abstract compiler atomics Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-12 21:26 ` [PATCH] eal: introduce atomics abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-31 22:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-01 1:07 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-02-01 8:09 ` Morten Brørup
2023-02-01 21:41 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-02 8:43 ` Morten Brørup
2023-02-02 19:00 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-02 20:44 ` Morten Brørup
2023-02-03 13:56 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-02-03 14:25 ` Morten Brørup
2023-02-03 12:19 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-02-03 20:49 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-07 15:16 ` Morten Brørup
2023-02-07 21:58 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-07 23:34 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-02-08 1:20 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-08 8:31 ` Morten Brørup
2023-02-08 16:35 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-09 0:16 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-02-09 8:34 ` Morten Brørup
2023-02-09 17:30 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-10 5:30 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-02-10 20:30 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-13 5:04 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-02-13 15:28 ` Ben Magistro
2023-02-13 15:55 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-02-13 16:46 ` Ben Magistro
2023-02-13 17:49 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2023-02-13 23:18 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-31 21:33 ` [PATCH] eal: abstract compiler atomics Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-08 21:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-08 21:43 ` [PATCH v2] eal: introduce atomics abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-09 8:05 ` Morten Brørup
2023-02-09 18:15 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-09 19:19 ` Morten Brørup
2023-02-09 22:04 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-03 21:17 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2023-02-09 9:04 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-02-09 12:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-09 17:40 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-09 22:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-10 0:36 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-09 17:38 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-03 21:32 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2023-04-03 21:11 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2023-04-03 21:25 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-04-04 2:24 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-22 18:09 ` [PATCH v2] eal: abstract compiler atomics Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-22 20:07 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-02-23 19:11 ` Tyler Retzlaff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87739@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=koncept1@gmail.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).