From: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
To: "David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <probb@iol.unh.edu>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] Release ethdev shared memory on port cleanup
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 12:18:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87B1E@smartserver.smartshare.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230818091321.2404089-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>
> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, 18 August 2023 11.13
>
> This series was triggered after investigating why the
> eal_flags_file_prefix_autotest unit test was failing in the case of
> statically built binaries [1]).
>
> For now, I went with a simple (naive) approach and put all accesses to the
> shared data under a single lock: ethdev maintainers, it is your turn to
> shine and give me reasons why we should keep the locks the way they
> were ;-).
This looks like a better solution to me. Perhaps because I'm not an ethdev maintainer. ;-)
> And let's see what the CI reports...
>
> 1: https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20230816153439.551501-12-
> bruce.richardson@intel.com/T/#m0e4c23f7be80bbdac076a387f4a2f9094dd07e0a
Series-acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-18 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-18 9:13 David Marchand
2023-08-18 9:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: protect shared memory accesses under one lock David Marchand
2023-08-18 9:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: cleanup shared data with the last port David Marchand
2023-08-18 11:36 ` David Marchand
2023-08-18 10:18 ` Morten Brørup [this message]
2023-08-31 15:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] Release ethdev shared memory on port cleanup Thomas Monjalon
2023-08-18 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 " David Marchand
2023-08-18 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: protect shared memory accesses under one lock David Marchand
2023-08-18 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ethdev: cleanup shared data with the last port David Marchand
2023-08-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Release ethdev shared memory on port cleanup David Marchand
2023-08-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ethdev: protect shared memory accesses under one lock David Marchand
2023-08-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ethdev: avoid panicking in absence of ethdev shared data David Marchand
2023-08-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ethdev: cleanup shared data with the last port David Marchand
2023-08-31 16:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] Release ethdev shared memory on port cleanup Thomas Monjalon
2023-09-01 7:32 ` David Marchand
2023-09-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v4 " David Marchand
2023-09-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: protect shared memory accesses under one lock David Marchand
2023-09-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ethdev: avoid panicking in absence of ethdev shared data David Marchand
2023-09-27 11:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] ethdev: cleanup shared data with the last port David Marchand
2023-10-11 12:53 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Release ethdev shared memory on port cleanup Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35D87B1E@smartserver.smartshare.dk \
--to=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=probb@iol.unh.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).