DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] i40e: fix setting of default MAC address
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 03:10:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F80E2BE696@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479990879-26598-1-git-send-email-iryzhov@nfware.com>

Hi, Igor

Thanks for your contribute, my comments are in below, thanks.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igor Ryzhov [mailto:iryzhov@nfware.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 8:35 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing
> <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> Subject: [RFC PATCH] i40e: fix setting of default MAC address
> 
> While testing X710 cards in our lab I found that setting of default MAC
> address doesn't work correctly for i40e driver. I compared DPDK driver
> implementation with Linux driver implementation and found that a lot of
> code is lost in DPDK.
> I tried to make DPDK implementation similar to Linux implementation and it
> worked for me – now everything is working. But I'm not sure that my
> changes are correct so, please, maintainers, check the patch very careful.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> index 67778ba..b73f9c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> @@ -9694,6 +9694,7 @@ static int i40e_get_eeprom(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev,  static void i40e_set_default_mac_addr(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>  				      struct ether_addr *mac_addr)
>  {
> +	struct i40e_vsi *vsi =
> +I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_MAIN_VSI(dev->data->dev_private);
>  	struct i40e_hw *hw = I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(dev->data-
> >dev_private);
> 
>  	if (!is_valid_assigned_ether_addr(mac_addr)) { @@ -9701,8 +9702,33
> @@ static void i40e_set_default_mac_addr(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>  		return;
>  	}
> 
> -	/* Flags: 0x3 updates port address */
> -	i40e_aq_mac_address_write(hw, 0x3, mac_addr->addr_bytes,
> NULL);
> +	i40e_aq_mac_address_write(hw, I40E_AQC_WRITE_TYPE_LAA_WOL,
> +mac_addr->addr_bytes, NULL);
> +
> +	if (!memcmp(&dev->data->mac_addrs[0].addr_bytes, hw-
> >mac.addr, ETH_ADDR_LEN)) {
> +		struct i40e_aqc_remove_macvlan_element_data element;
> +
> +		memset(&element, 0, sizeof(element));
> +		memcpy(element.mac_addr, &dev->data-
> >mac_addrs[0].addr_bytes, ETH_ADDR_LEN);
> +		element.flags = I40E_AQC_MACVLAN_DEL_PERFECT_MATCH;
> +		i40e_aq_remove_macvlan(hw, vsi->seid, &element, 1, NULL);
> +	} else {
> +		i40e_vsi_delete_mac(vsi, &dev->data->mac_addrs[0]);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!memcmp(mac_addr->addr_bytes, hw->mac.addr,
> ETH_ADDR_LEN)) {

In rte_eth_dev_default_mac_addr_set, before call dev_ops->mac_addr_set,
The dev->data->mac_addrs[0] is already set to the input addr.

So the if loop is the same as above if, why not merge them? 


If you look the code in eth_i40e_dev_init, you will found the dev->data->mac_addrs[0]
Is just the hw->mac.addr. And I think we need to make them same all the time.
So hw->mac.addr may also need to be updated.


Thanks for figure it out!

/Jingjing

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-02  3:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-24 12:34 Igor Ryzhov
2016-12-01  9:52 ` Igor Ryzhov
2016-12-02  3:10 ` Wu, Jingjing [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F80E2BE696@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=iryzhov@nfware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).