DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	"Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] fix bitmask of supported Tx flags
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 01:13:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810CD707D@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4316c677-ca2f-f98c-a3c9-b1eb14fa4123@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 12:33 AM
> To: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com; Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang@intel.com>;
> Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] fix bitmask of supported Tx flags
> 
> On 2/8/2017 5:05 AM, Jingjing Wu wrote:
> > Some Tx offload flags are missed in bitmask of all supported packet Tx
> > flags, it will cause rte_eth_tx_prepare fails when Tx burst packets.
> >
> > v4 change:
> >  - add PKT_TX_IEEE1588_TMST to PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK
> >
> > v3 changes:
> >  - add PKT_TX_MACSEC to PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK
> >  - refine code of drivers' TX_OFFLOAD_MASK definition
> >
> > v2 changes:
> >  - redefine the PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK
> >  - fix more drivers
> >
> > Jingjing Wu (4):
> >   net/i40e: fix bitmask of supported Tx flags
> >   net/ixgbe: fix bitmask of supported Tx flags
> >   net/e1000: fix bitmask of supported Tx flags
> 
> Hi Jingjing,
> 
> Just to confirm, other drivers that use PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK not updated
> because they don't support newly added flags, right?
> 
Yes, exactly!

Thanks
Jingjing

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-09  1:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-24 11:50 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Jingjing Wu
2017-01-24 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/i40e: fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Jingjing Wu
2017-01-26 14:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-04  3:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-04  3:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-04  3:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/i40e: fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-05 10:28     ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-06  3:02       ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-06 10:28         ` Olivier Matz
2017-02-07  2:30           ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-06 10:26     ` Olivier Matz
2017-02-07  2:30       ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-04  3:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ixgbe: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-05 11:59     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-05 12:10       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-06  8:53         ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-06 12:11           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-07  2:29             ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-08  0:34               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-04  3:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] net/e1000: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-04  3:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] net/fm10k: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07  3:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07  3:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] net/i40e: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07 13:48       ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-07 15:45         ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-02-07 16:01           ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-07  3:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] net/ixgbe: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07  3:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] net/e1000: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-07  3:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08  5:05     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08  5:05       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] net/i40e: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08  5:05       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] net/ixgbe: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08  5:05       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] net/e1000: " Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08  5:05       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] mbuf: fix bitmask of Tx offload flags Jingjing Wu
2017-02-08 16:27         ` Olivier MATZ
2017-02-08 16:32       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] fix bitmask of supported Tx flags Ferruh Yigit
2017-02-09  1:13         ` Wu, Jingjing [this message]
2017-02-08 16:46       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-02-09 14:37         ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F810CD707D@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).