DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
	Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Kumar A S <kumaras@chelsio.com>,
	Nirranjan Kirubaharan <nirranjan@chelsio.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/10] ethdev: add a generic flow and new behavior switch to fdir
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 01:17:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8DC9E41@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3876623.1zX8JlhDJf@xps13>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 2:25 AM
> To: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Kumar A S
> <kumaras@chelsio.com>; Nirranjan Kirubaharan <nirranjan@chelsio.com>; Wu, Jingjing
> <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/10] ethdev: add a generic flow and new behavior switch
> to fdir
> 
> 2016-02-25 15:03, Rahul Lakkireddy:
> > On Wednesday, February 02/24/16, 2016 at 14:17:58 -0800, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > A raw flow provides a generic way for vendors to add their vendor
> > > > specific input flow.
> > >
> > > Please, "generic" and "vendor specific" in the same sentence.
> > > It's obviously wrong.
> >
> > I think this sentence is being mis-interpreted.
> > What I intended to say is: the fields are generic so that any vendor can
> > hook-in. The fields themselves are not vendor specific.
> 
> We are trying to push some features into fields of an API instead of
> thinking how to make it simple.
> 
> > > > In our case, it is possible to match several flows
> > > > in a single rule.  For example, it's possible to set an ethernet, vlan,
> > > > ip and tcp/udp flows all in a single rule.  We can specify all of these
> > > > flows in a single raw input flow, which can then be passed to cxgbe flow
> > > > director to set the corresponding filter.
> > >
> > > I feel we need to define what is an API.
> > > If the application wants to call something specific to the NIC, why using
> > > the ethdev API? You just have to include cxgbe.h.
> >
> > Well, in that sense, flow-director is also very intel specific, no ?
> 
> Yes. I think the term "flow director" comes from Intel.
> 
> > What we are trying to do is make flow-director generic
> 
> So let's stop calling it flow director.
> We are talking about filtering, right?
> 
Hi Thomas

Are you suggesting chelsio to define a new filter type?

> Why is it so complex? We are talking about packet filtering, not rocket science!
>
The complex is due to different NICs different behavior :-)
As I know, it is a common way to use used-define data pass specific infor to driver.

Even flow director is concept from Intel's NIC, but I think it is the generic one comparing
with other kinds of filters. So I think that's why Rahul choose it to add their kind of filters.
As I know enic driver also uses flow director API to support their filters.

No matter chelsio NIC filter uses flow director API or define another new filter type. I vote
the change happened in struct rte_eth_fdir_input, it provide a RAW Flow type,
And there is also a mask field for that, by this way, user can have a flexible way to configure.
And drivers can parse the raw input to define the filter fields.

But for the change happened in struct rte_eth_fdir_action, only SWITCH type is added,
Where to switch? All things is in behavior_arg[RTE_ETH_BEHAVIOR_ARG_MAX_LEN]
which is black to user. Maybe your previous define in RFC makes more sense. It's better to add
user defined field but not for all args.

Any better suggestion?

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-26  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-03  8:32 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] cxgbe: Add flow director support Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-03  8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/10] ethdev: add a generic flow and new behavior switch to fdir Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-24 14:43   ` Bruce Richardson
2016-02-24 15:02     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-24 18:40       ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-24 22:17         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-25  9:33           ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-25 18:24             ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-26  1:17               ` Wu, Jingjing [this message]
2016-03-03 15:03                 ` Olga Shern
2016-07-20 10:45                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-25  3:26   ` Wu, Jingjing
2016-02-25  9:11     ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-03  8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/10] examples/test-cxgbe-filters: add example to test cxgbe fdir support Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-24 14:40   ` Bruce Richardson
2016-02-24 18:35     ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-25 13:48       ` Bruce Richardson
2016-02-03  8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/10] cxgbe: add skeleton to add support for T5 hardware filtering Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-03  8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/10] cxgbe: add control txq for communicating filtering info Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-03  8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/10] cxgbe: add compressed local IP table for matching IPv6 addresses Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-03  8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/10] cxgbe: add layer 2 table for switch action filter Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-03  8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/10] cxgbe: add source mac " Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-03  8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/10] cxgbe: add LE-TCAM filtering support Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-03  8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/10] cxgbe: add HASH " Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-03  8:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/10] cxgbe: add flow director support and update documentation Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-02-22 10:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] cxgbe: Add flow director support Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-03-22 13:43 ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8DC9E41@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=kumaras@chelsio.com \
    --cc=nirranjan@chelsio.com \
    --cc=rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).