DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40evf: fix return value if command fails
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 01:39:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8E3B663@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160506151331.GG8880@bricha3-MOBL3>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 11:14 PM
> To: Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: Zhang, Helin; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40evf: fix return value if command fails
> 
> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 02:22:54PM +0800, Jingjing Wu wrote:
> > Previously, if message is sent successfully, but no response is
> > received, function "i40evf_execute_vf_cmd" will return without error.
> > The root cause is value "err" is overwritten. This patch fixes it.
> >
> > Fixes: ae19955e7c86 ("i40evf: support reporting PF reset")
> > Signed-off-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 8 +++-----
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > index 2bce69b..9380019 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> > @@ -327,8 +327,7 @@ i40evf_execute_vf_cmd(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> struct vf_cmd_info *args)
> >  	struct i40e_vf *vf = I40EVF_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_VF(dev->data-
> >dev_private);
> >  	struct i40evf_arq_msg_info info;
> >  	enum i40evf_aq_result ret;
> > -	int err = -1;
> > -	int i = 0;
> > +	int err, i = 0;
> >
> >  	if (_atomic_set_cmd(vf, args->ops))
> >  		return -1;
> > @@ -346,6 +345,7 @@ i40evf_execute_vf_cmd(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> struct vf_cmd_info *args)
> >  		return err;
> >  	}
> >
> > +	err = -1;
> >  	switch (args->ops) {
> >  	case I40E_VIRTCHNL_OP_RESET_VF:
> >  		/*no need to process in this function */
> 
> Hi Jingjing,
> 
> this patch changes this return value in this case
> (I40E_VIRTCHNL_OP_RESET_VF).
> Is this intentional - if so it probably needs to be documented in the commit
> message. If not, the "err = -1" should be put at the start of the do { } while
> loop for the GET_VF_RESOURCES command.
> 
> Perhaps to avoid future errors, each case in the switch should explicitly set
> it's own default error value?
> 
Yes, you reminded me the case I40E_VIRTCHNL_OP_RESET_VF. Let me rework this.


Thanks
Jingjing

> /Bruce

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-09  1:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-05  6:22 Jingjing Wu
2016-05-06 15:13 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-05-09  1:39   ` Wu, Jingjing [this message]
2016-05-10  2:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jingjing Wu
2016-05-30 16:31   ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8E3B663@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).