DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: huangdengdui <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <lihuisong@huawei.com>, <liuyonglong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix segment fault with invalid queue id
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 18:18:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fe13815-9a53-d7cb-a533-bd037de59ad8@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230516081206.792072d0@hermes.local>

On 2023/5/16 23:12, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 16 May 2023 19:00:21 +0800
> Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> When input queue id is invalid, it will lead to
>> Segmentation fault, like:
>>
>> dpdk-testpmd -a 0000:01:00.0 -- -i
>> testpmd> show port 0 txq/rxq 99 desc 0 status  
>> Segmentation fault
>>
>> dpdk-testpmd -a 0000:01:00.0 -- -i
>> testpmd> show port 0 rxq 99 desc used count  
>> Segmentation fault
>>
>> This patch fixes it.
>>
>> In addition, this patch add the check for the offset
>> of the descriptor in case of other anomalies.
>>
>> Fixes: fae9aa717d6c ("app/testpmd: support checking descriptor status")
>> Fixes: 3f9acb5c83bb ("ethdev: avoid non-dataplane checks in Rx queue count")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
> 
> What is the backtrace and device driver?  The problem is that other users
> besides testpmd might hit same problem.
> 
> It would make sense to have a function to test for valid rx and tx queue id
> in rte_ethdev. Similar to existing rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port() rather than
> open coding it.  Maybe rte_eth_dev_is_valid_rxq(port_id, queue_id)?
> 
> here was talk that the existing rx queue descriptor status is racy, and
> unused by any real application; and therefore would be good candidate for
> future removal.
Hi, Stephen

OK.

Agreed. But these APIs are still in dpdk, so testpmd as user side should use them correctly.

Thanks,
Dengdui

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-22  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-16 11:00 Dengdui Huang
2023-05-16 15:12 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-05-19 10:18   ` huangdengdui [this message]
2023-05-22 13:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] add API and use it to fix a bug Dengdui Huang
2023-05-22 13:09   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: add API to check queue ID validity Dengdui Huang
2023-05-22 13:58     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-05-24  7:38       ` huangdengdui
2023-05-24  9:03         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-05-31 16:31       ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-01 22:13         ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-02  1:36           ` huangdengdui
2023-05-22 13:09   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] app/testpmd: fix segment fault with invalid queue id Dengdui Huang
2023-05-25  7:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] add Rx/Tx queue ID check API and use it to fix a bug Dengdui Huang
2023-05-25  7:03   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: add API to check if queue is available Dengdui Huang
2023-05-25  7:03   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] app/testpmd: fix segment fault with invalid queue ID Dengdui Huang
2023-06-02  7:52 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] add Rx/Tx queue ID check API and use it to fix a bug Dengdui Huang
2023-06-02  7:52   ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ethdev: add API to check if queue is valid Dengdui Huang
2023-06-02 12:47     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-05  1:24       ` huangdengdui
2023-06-02  7:52   ` [PATCH v4 2/2] app/testpmd: fix segment fault with invalid queue ID Dengdui Huang
2023-06-02 12:47     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-05  2:27 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] add Rx/Tx queue ID check API and use it to fix a bug Dengdui Huang
2023-06-05  2:27   ` [PATCH v5 1/2] ethdev: add API to check if queue is valid Dengdui Huang
2023-06-06  9:06     ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-05  2:27   ` [PATCH v5 2/2] app/testpmd: fix segment fault with invalid queue ID Dengdui Huang
2023-06-06  9:07   ` [PATCH v5 0/2] add Rx/Tx queue ID check API and use it to fix a bug Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9fe13815-9a53-d7cb-a533-bd037de59ad8@huawei.com \
    --to=huangdengdui@huawei.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).