DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhao1, Wei" <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
To: "Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/18] net/ixgbe: store SYN filter
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 06:48:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <A2573D2ACFCADC41BB3BE09C6DE313CA0201E674@PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ec950b1-f4e2-7343-8ba1-60c849695205@intel.com>

Hi, yigit

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 12:26 AM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/18] net/ixgbe: store SYN filter
> 
> On 12/22/2016 9:48 AM, Zhao1, Wei wrote:
> > Hi, Yigit
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 12:56 AM
> >> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/18] net/ixgbe: store SYN filter
> >>
> >> On 12/2/2016 10:42 AM, Wei Zhao wrote:
> >>> From: wei zhao1 <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> Add support for storing SYN filter in SW.
> >>
> >> Do you think does it makes more clear to refer as TCP SYN filter? Or
> >> SYN filter is clear enough?
> >>
> >
> > Ok, I will change to " TCP SYN filter " to make it more clear
> >
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: wei zhao1 <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> >>
> >> Can you please update sign-off to your actual name?
> >>
> >
> > Ok, I will change to " Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>"
> >
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> >>> drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.h |  2 ++
> >>>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> >>> b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> >>> index edc9b22..7f10cca 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c
> >>> @@ -1287,6 +1287,8 @@ eth_ixgbe_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev
> *eth_dev)
> >>>  	memset(filter_info->fivetuple_mask, 0,
> >>>  	       sizeof(uint32_t) * IXGBE_5TUPLE_ARRAY_SIZE);
> >>>
> >>> +	/* initialize SYN filter */
> >>> +	filter_info->syn_info = 0;
> >>
> >> can it be an option to memset all filter_info? (and of course move
> >> list init after memset)
> >>
> >
> > Maybe, change to the following code?
> >
> > memset(filter_info, 0, sizeof(struct ixgbe_filter_info));
> > TAILQ_INIT(&filter_info->fivetuple_list);
> >
> > But that wiil mix /* initialize ether type filter */ and /* initialize
> > 5tuple filter list */ two process together, Because  struct ixgbe_filter_info
> store two type info of ether and 5tuple.
> 
> I see filter info consist of different filter types, but as far as I can see they are
> not used before this memset, so what is the problem of cleaning all struct?
> 
> Currently memset a sub-set of struct, and assigns zero to other field explicitly,
> and rest remains undefined and unused. I am suggesting memset whole
> structure and get rid of zero assignment.
> 

Ok, do as your suggestion in v3.

> > So, not to change ?
> >
> > struct ixgbe_filter_info {
> > 	uint8_t ethertype_mask;  /* Bit mask for every used ethertype filter
> */
> > 	/* store used ethertype filters*/
> > 	struct ixgbe_ethertype_filter
> ethertype_filters[IXGBE_MAX_ETQF_FILTERS];
> > 	/* Bit mask for every used 5tuple filter */
> > 	uint32_t fivetuple_mask[IXGBE_5TUPLE_ARRAY_SIZE];
> > 	struct ixgbe_5tuple_filter_list fivetuple_list;
> > 	/* store the SYN filter info */
> > 	uint32_t syn_info;
> > };
> >
> >
> <...>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-10  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-02 10:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/18] net/ixgbe: Consistent filter API Wei Zhao
2016-12-02 10:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/18] net/ixgbe: store SYN filter Wei Zhao
2016-12-20 16:55   ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-12-22  9:48     ` Zhao1, Wei
2017-01-06 16:26       ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-10  6:48         ` Zhao1, Wei [this message]
2016-12-26  1:47     ` Zhao1, Wei
2016-12-02 10:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/18] net/ixgbe: store flow director filter Wei Zhao
2016-12-20 16:58   ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-12-26  2:50     ` Zhao1, Wei
2016-12-02 10:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/18] net/ixgbe: store L2 tunnel filter Wei Zhao
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/18] net/ixgbe: restore n-tuple filter Wei Zhao
2016-12-20 16:58   ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-12-26  3:32     ` Zhao1, Wei
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/18] net/ixgbe: restore ether type filter Wei Zhao
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/18] net/ixgbe: restore SYN filter Wei Zhao
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/18] net/ixgbe: restore flow director filter Wei Zhao
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/18] net/ixgbe: restore L2 tunnel filter Wei Zhao
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/18] net/ixgbe: store and restore L2 tunnel configuration Wei Zhao
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/18] net/ixgbe: flush all the filters Wei Zhao
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/18] net/ixgbe: parse n-tuple filter Wei Zhao
2016-12-20 17:23   ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 12/18] net/ixgbe: parse ethertype filter Wei Zhao
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 13/18] net/ixgbe: parse SYN filter Wei Zhao
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 14/18] net/ixgbe: parse L2 tunnel filter Wei Zhao
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 15/18] net/ixgbe: parse flow director filter Wei Zhao
2016-12-20 17:00   ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-12-22  9:19     ` Zhao1, Wei
2016-12-22 10:44       ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-12-23  8:13         ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-12-27  3:31           ` Zhao1, Wei
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 16/18] net/ixgbe: create consistent filter Wei Zhao
2016-12-20 17:25   ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-12-23  6:26     ` Zhao1, Wei
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 17/18] net/ixgbe: destroy " Wei Zhao
2016-12-02 10:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 18/18] net/ixgbe: flush " Wei Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=A2573D2ACFCADC41BB3BE09C6DE313CA0201E674@PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com \
    --to=wei.zhao1@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).