From: "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
To: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Cc: "jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] IXGBE vPMD changes for aarch64
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 02:52:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM0PR08MB3986D8A55A8EC8924A0947B19EA10@AM0PR08MB3986.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190825013357.GA114581@intel.com>
Hi Xiaolong,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
> Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2019 09:34
> To: Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China) <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
> Cc: jerinj@marvell.com; Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)
> <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] IXGBE vPMD changes for aarch64
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the patches, could you also provide the Fixes tag and cc stable?
> The patchset looks good to me.
Code changes in both patches are not for bug fixing.
Patch 1/2 includes fix for code comments. I don't think it deserves a Fixes tag or backporting. Can we skip the Fixes tag?
>
> Thanks,
> Xiaolong
>
> On 08/13, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
> >Couple of changes to IXGBE vector PMD on aarch64 platform.
> >An unnecessary memory barrier was identified and removed.
> >Also part of processing was replaced with NEON intrinsics.
> >Both of the changes will help to improve performance.
> >
> >Ruifeng Wang (2):
> > net/ixgbe: remove barrier in vPMD for aarch64
> > net/ixgbe: use neon intrinsics to count packet for aarch64
> >
> > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_neon.c | 32 ++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> >
> >--
> >2.17.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-26 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-13 10:02 Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-13 10:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/ixgbe: remove barrier in vPMD " Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-13 10:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/ixgbe: use neon intrinsics to count packet " Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-25 1:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] IXGBE vPMD changes " Ye Xiaolong
2019-08-26 2:52 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China) [this message]
2019-08-26 10:39 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-08-26 10:53 ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-08-28 8:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-28 8:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] net/ixgbe: remove barrier in vPMD " Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-28 8:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/ixgbe: use neon intrinsics to count packet " Ruifeng Wang
2019-08-28 15:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] IXGBE vPMD changes " Ye Xiaolong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AM0PR08MB3986D8A55A8EC8924A0947B19EA10@AM0PR08MB3986.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).