DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
To: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
Cc: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>,
	"jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com" <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
	"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal: add API to align integer to	previous	power of 2
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 06:03:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM4PR0501MB265726E53B5A1F52499B9E47D2C80@AM4PR0501MB2657.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28F3DAA5-CCAB-4D2E-A6C9-FEB685A619C8@intel.com>



> From: Wiles, Keith, Sunday, February 18, 2018 5:39 PM
> > On Feb 18, 2018, at 12:11 AM, Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Pavan
> >
> > Please see some comments below.
> >
> > From: Pavan Nikhilesh, Saturday, February 17, 2018 12:50 PM
> >> Add 32b and 64b API's to align the given integer to the previous power of
> 2.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>
> >> ---
> >> lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h | 36
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h
> >> b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h
> >> index c7803e41c..126914f07 100644
> >> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h
> >> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h
> >> @@ -259,6 +259,24 @@ rte_align32pow2(uint32_t x)
> >> 	return x + 1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +/**
> >> + * Aligns input parameter to the previous power of 2
> >> + *
> >> + * @param x
> >> + *   The integer value to algin
> >> + *
> >> + * @return
> >> + *   Input parameter aligned to the previous power of 2
> >
> > I think the zero case(x=0) result should be documented.
> >
> >> + */
> >> +static inline uint32_t
> >> +rte_align32lowpow2(uint32_t x)
> >
> > What do you think about " rte_align32prevpow2"?
> >
> >> +{
> >> +	x = rte_align32pow2(x);
> >
> > 	In case of  x is power of 2 number(already aligned), looks like the
> result here is x and the final result is (x >> 1)?
> > 	Is it as you expect?
> >
> >> +	x--;
> >> +
> >> +	return x - (x >> 1);
> >
> > Why can't the implementation just be:
> > return  rte_align32pow2(x) >> 1;
> >
> > If the above is correct, Are you sure we need this API?
> >
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> /**
> >>  * Aligns 64b input parameter to the next power of 2
> >>  *
> >> @@ -282,6 +300,24 @@ rte_align64pow2(uint64_t v)
> >> 	return v + 1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +/**
> >> + * Aligns 64b input parameter to the previous power of 2
> >> + *
> >> + * @param v
> >> + *   The 64b value to align
> >> + *
> >> + * @return
> >> + *   Input parameter aligned to the previous power of 2
> >> + */
> >> +static inline uint64_t
> >> +rte_align64lowpow2(uint64_t v)
> >> +{
> >> +	v = rte_align64pow2(v);
> >> +	v--;
> >> +
> >> +	return v - (v >> 1);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >
> > Same comments for 64b API.
> >
> >> /*********** Macros for calculating min and max **********/
> >>
> >> /**
> >> --
> >> 2.16.1
> >
> >
> > If it is a new API, I think it should be added to the map file and to be tagged
> as experimental. No?
> >
> 
> Is this the type of API that needs to be marked experimental,

I think it is relevant to any exposed API(not only for internal libraries).

> we should be able to prove these functions, correct?

Don't we need to prove any function in DPDK?
What is your point?

> > Matan
> 
> Regards,
> Keith

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-19  6:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-17 10:49 Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-02-17 10:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test: update common auto test Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-02-18  6:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal: add API to align integer to previous power of 2 Matan Azrad
2018-02-18 15:39   ` Wiles, Keith
2018-02-19  6:03     ` Matan Azrad [this message]
2018-02-19 13:55       ` Wiles, Keith
2018-02-19 14:13         ` Matan Azrad
2018-02-19 14:21           ` Wiles, Keith
2018-02-19 16:18           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-02-19  8:36   ` Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-02-19 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-02-19 11:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] test: update common auto test Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-02-19 12:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: add API to align integer to previous power of 2 Matan Azrad
2018-02-26 19:10     ` Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-02-27 19:30       ` Matan Azrad
2018-04-04 10:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-04-04 10:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] test: update common auto test Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-04-04 12:49     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-04 12:54       ` Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-04-04 16:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal: add API to align integer to previous power of 2 Matan Azrad
2018-04-04 16:42     ` Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-04-04 17:11       ` Matan Azrad
2018-04-04 17:51         ` Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-04-04 18:10           ` Matan Azrad
2018-04-04 18:15             ` Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-04-04 18:23               ` Matan Azrad
2018-04-04 18:36                 ` Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-04-04 19:41                   ` Matan Azrad
2018-04-04 13:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Pavan Nikhilesh
2018-04-04 15:23   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM4PR0501MB265726E53B5A1F52499B9E47D2C80@AM4PR0501MB2657.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).