patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>,
	Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	"Bruce Richardson" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/7] ethdev: fix port data reset timing
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 15:12:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM4PR0501MB26574B4D8CF840957B7FBB40D2DA0@AM4PR0501MB2657.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b63a4ad5-83a7-d8d2-5162-d470ee3388e9@intel.com>

Hi Ferruh

From: Ferruh Yigit, Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 5:07 PM
> On 3/5/2018 2:52 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> > HI
> >
> > From: Ferruh Yigit, Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 1:24 PM
> >> On 1/18/2018 4:35 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> >>> rte_eth_dev_data structure is allocated per ethdev port and can be
> >>> used to get a data of the port internally.
> >>>
> >>> rte_eth_dev_attach_secondary tries to find the port identifier using
> >>> rte_eth_dev_data name field comparison and may get an identifier of
> >>> invalid port in case of this port was released by the primary
> >>> process because the port release API doesn't reset the port data.
> >>>
> >>> So, it will be better to reset the port data in release time instead
> >>> of allocation time.
> >>>
> >>> Move the port data reset to the port release API.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: d948f596fee2 ("ethdev: fix port data mismatched in multiple
> >>> process model")
> >>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 2 +-
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> >>> b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c index 7044159..156231c 100644
> >>> --- a/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> >>> +++ b/lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c
> >>> @@ -204,7 +204,6 @@ struct rte_eth_dev *
> >>>  		return NULL;
> >>>  	}
> >>>
> >>> -	memset(&rte_eth_dev_data[port_id], 0, sizeof(struct
> >> rte_eth_dev_data));
> >>>  	eth_dev = eth_dev_get(port_id);
> >>>  	snprintf(eth_dev->data->name, sizeof(eth_dev->data->name),
> >> "%s", name);
> >>>  	eth_dev->data->port_id = port_id;
> >>> @@ -252,6 +251,7 @@ struct rte_eth_dev *
> >>>  	if (eth_dev == NULL)
> >>>  		return -EINVAL;
> >>>
> >>> +	memset(eth_dev->data, 0, sizeof(struct rte_eth_dev_data));
> >>
> >> Hi Matan,
> >>
> >> What most of the vdev release path does is:
> >>
> >> eth_dev = rte_eth_dev_allocated(...)
> >> rte_free(eth_dev->data->dev_private);
> >> rte_free(eth_dev->data);
> >> rte_eth_dev_release_port(eth_dev);
> >>
> >> Since eth_dev->data freed, memset() it in rte_eth_dev_release_port()
> >> will be problem.
> >>
> >> We don't run remove path that is why we didn't hit the issue but this
> >> seems problem for all virtual PMDs.
> >
> > Yes, it is a problem and should be fixed:
> > For vdevs which use private rte_eth_dev_data the remove order can be:
> > 	private_data = eth_dev->data;
> > 	rte_free(eth_dev->data->dev_private);
> > 	rte_eth_dev_release_port(eth_dev); /* The last operation working
> on ethdev structure. */
> > 	rte_free(private_data);
> 
> Do we need to save "private_data"?

Just to emphasis that eth_dev structure should not more be available after rte_eth_dev_release_port().
Maybe in the future rte_eth_dev_release_port() will zero eth_dev structure too :)

> >
> >
> >> Also rte_eth_dev_pci_release() looks problematic now.
> >
> > Yes, again, the last operation working on ethdev structure should be
> rte_eth_dev_release_port().
> >
> > So need to fix all vdevs and the rte_eth_dev_pci_release() function.
> >
> > Any comments?
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-05 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1511870281-15282-1-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com>
     [not found] ` <1515318351-4756-1-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com>
2018-01-07  9:45   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/6] " Matan Azrad
     [not found]   ` <1516293317-30748-1-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com>
2018-01-18 16:35     ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/7] " Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 17:00       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-19 12:38       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-03-05 11:24       ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-05 14:52         ` Matan Azrad
2018-03-05 15:06           ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-05 15:12             ` Matan Azrad [this message]
2018-03-27 22:37               ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-28 12:07                 ` Matan Azrad
2018-03-30 10:39                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-19 11:07                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-25 12:16                       ` Matan Azrad
2018-04-25 12:30                         ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Ori Kam
2018-04-25 12:54                         ` [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2018-04-25 14:01                           ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 16:35     ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/7] ethdev: fix used portid allocation Matan Azrad
2018-01-18 17:00       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-19 12:40       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-01-20 16:48         ` Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 17:26           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
     [not found]     ` <1516483468-9048-1-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com>
2018-01-20 21:24       ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 1/7] ethdev: fix port data reset timing Matan Azrad
2018-01-20 21:24       ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4 2/7] ethdev: fix used portid allocation Matan Azrad
     [not found]       ` <1516639103-27166-1-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com>
2018-01-22 16:38         ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5 1/7] ethdev: fix port data reset timing Matan Azrad
2018-01-22 16:38         ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v5 2/7] ethdev: fix used portid allocation Matan Azrad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM4PR0501MB26574B4D8CF840957B7FBB40D2DA0@AM4PR0501MB2657.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).