DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>,
	Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>,
	 Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/mlx5: engage free on completion queue
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:44:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM4PR05MB326526F36631B004C82DB42DD2310@AM4PR05MB3265.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e91d0abc-bf29-09b7-9f80-e68a478491b0@intel.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 17:44
> To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>; Raslan Darawsheh
> <rasland@mellanox.com>; Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>; Thomas
> Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/mlx5: engage free on completion
> queue
> 
> On 1/9/2020 3:27 PM, Slava Ovsiienko wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 17:19
> >> To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >> Cc: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>; Raslan Darawsheh
> >> <rasland@mellanox.com>; Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>; Thomas
> Monjalon
> >> <thomas@monjalon.net>
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/mlx5: engage free on
> >> completion queue
> >>
> >> On 1/9/2020 10:56 AM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> >>> The free on completion queue keeps the indices of elts array, all
> >>> mbuf stored below this index should be freed on arrival of normal
> >>> send completion. In debug version it also contains an index of
> >>> completed transmitting descriptor (WQE) to check queues
> synchronization.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
> >>> Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
> >>
> >> <...>
> >>
> >>> @@ -2108,17 +2108,18 @@ enum mlx5_txcmp_code {
> >>>  			/*
> >>>  			 * We are going to fetch all entries with
> >>>  			 * MLX5_CQE_SYNDROME_WR_FLUSH_ERR status.
> >>> +			 * The send queue is supposed to be empty.
> >>>  			 */
> >>>  			++ci;
> >>> +			txq->cq_pi = ci;
> >>> +			last_cqe = NULL;
> >>>  			continue;
> >>>  		}
> >>>  		/* Normal transmit completion. */
> >>> +		assert(ci != txq->cq_pi);
> >>> +		assert((txq->fcqs[ci & txq->cqe_m] >> 16) == cqe-
> >>> wqe_counter);
> >>
> >> And same comments on these as previous patches, we spend some effort
> >> to remove the 'rte_panic' from drivers, this is almost same thing.
> >>
> >> I think a driver shouldn't decide to exit whole application, it's
> >> effect should be limited to the driver.
> >>
> >> Assert is useful for debug and during development, but not sure
> >> having them in the production code.
> >
> > IIRC, "assert" is standard C function. Compiled only if there is no NDEBUG
> defined.
> > So, assert does exactly what you are saying - provide the debug break
> > not allowing the bug to evolve. And no this break in production code.
> >
> 
> Since mlx driver is using NDEBUG defined, what you said is right indeed. But
> why not using RTE_ASSERT to be consistent with rest. There is a specific config
> option to control assert (RTE_ENABLE_ASSERT) and anyone using it will get
> different behavior with mlx5.

OK, to summarize (after discussions with Ferruh and Thomas):
1. assert/NDEBUG in mlx5 should be fixed
2 in mlx5 assert should be replaced by MLX5_ASSERT macro, it provides "in-development" assert control if needed
3. mlx5 PMDs local debug configuration option will be removed from global build configuration 
(it is absent in meson build now, and as makefile is subject to drop - this option will not be supported anymore)
4. The patch in subject ("net/mlx5: engage free on completion queue") is not related to bullets 1-3 and
   should be accepted to Upstream, and the is the claimed commitment from my side to provide
  the dedicated patch for 1-3.

With best regards, Slava

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-17 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-08 16:15 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] net/mlx5: remove Tx descriptor reserved field usage Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-08 16:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] net/mlx5: move Tx complete request routine Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-08 16:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] net/mlx5: update Tx error handling routine Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-08 16:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] net/mlx5: add free on completion queue Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-08 16:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] net/mlx5: engage " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-09 10:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] net/mlx5: remove Tx descriptor reserved field usage Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-09 10:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] net/mlx5: move Tx complete request routine Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-09 10:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] net/mlx5: update Tx error handling routine Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-09 10:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] net/mlx5: add free on completion queue Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-09 15:12     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-09 15:22       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-09 10:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] net/mlx5: engage " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-09 15:18     ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-09 15:27       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-09 15:43         ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-01-09 16:22           ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-10  9:06             ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-10  9:28               ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-10  9:34                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-10  9:55                   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-10 13:11                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-01-10 13:42                       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2020-01-17 10:44           ` Slava Ovsiienko [this message]
2020-01-09 14:22   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] net/mlx5: remove Tx descriptor reserved field usage Raslan Darawsheh
2020-01-13  9:35   ` Raslan Darawsheh
2020-01-09 17:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-09 17:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] net/mlx5: move Tx complete request routine Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-09 17:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] net/mlx5: update Tx error handling routine Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-09 17:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] net/mlx5: add free on completion queue Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-09 17:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] net/mlx5: engage " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2020-01-13  9:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] net/mlx5: remove Tx descriptor reserved field usage Raslan Darawsheh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM4PR05MB326526F36631B004C82DB42DD2310@AM4PR05MB3265.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=viacheslavo@mellanox.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=orika@mellanox.com \
    --cc=rasland@mellanox.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).