DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
To: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] net/mlx5: share Memory Regions for multiport device
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 06:42:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM4PR05MB32657B4C24CDDE61454E59E1D22B0@AM4PR05MB3265.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190412192218.GA14250@mtidpdk.mti.labs.mlnx>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yongseok Koh
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 22:22
> To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] net/mlx5: share Memory Regions for
> multiport device
> 
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 03:45:40PM +0000, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> > The multiport Infiniband device support was introduced [1].
> > All active ports, belonging to the same Infiniband device use the
> > signle shared Infiniband context of that device and share the resources:
> >   - QPs are created within shared context
> >   - Verbs flows are also created with specifying port index
> >   - DV/DR resources
> >   - Protection Domain
> >   - Event Handlers
> >
> > This patchset adds support for Memory Regions sharing between portes,
> > created on the base of multiport Infiniban device.
> > The datapath of mlx5 uses the layered cache subsystem for
> > allocating/releasing Memory Regions, only the lowest layer L3 is
> > subject to share due to performance issues.
> >
> > [1]
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpatch
> >
> es.dpdk.org%2Fcover%2F51800%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cyskoh%40mella
> nox.com
> >
> %7Cf16a8f547c3b4b3a1f7608d6bf5df4cd%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d14925
> 6f461b
> >
> %7C0%7C0%7C636906807620990767&amp;sdata=uinIUW9euBYb74BhK9f8IN
> khaTM6jw
> > yCXDhmGtmEIME%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c     |  40 +++++++----
> >  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h     |  15 ++--
> >  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c  | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> -----
> >  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.h  |   5 +-
> >  drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txq.c |   2 +-
> >  5 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c index
> > 9ff50df..7ff5c8b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.c
> > @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ struct mlx5_dev_spawn_data {
> >  	struct mlx5_switch_info info; /**< Switch information. */
> >  	struct ibv_device *ibv_dev; /**< Associated IB device. */
> >  	struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev; /**< Associated Ethernet device. */
> > +	struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; /**< Backend PCI device. */
> >  };
> >
> >  static LIST_HEAD(, mlx5_ibv_shared) mlx5_ibv_list =
> > LIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(); @@ -222,6 +223,7 @@ struct
> mlx5_dev_spawn_data {
> >  		sizeof(sh->ibdev_name));
> >  	strncpy(sh->ibdev_path, sh->ctx->device->ibdev_path,
> >  		sizeof(sh->ibdev_path));
> > +	sh->pci_dev = spawn->pci_dev;
> >  	pthread_mutex_init(&sh->intr_mutex, NULL);
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Setting port_id to max unallowed value means @@ -236,6 +238,22
> @@
> > struct mlx5_dev_spawn_data {
> >  		err = ENOMEM;
> >  		goto error;
> >  	}
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Once the device is added to the list of memory event
> > +	 * callback, its global MR cache table cannot be expanded
> > +	 * on the fly because of deadlock. If it overflows, lookup
> > +	 * should be done by searching MR list linearly, which is slow.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * At this point the device is not added to the memory
> > +	 * event list yet, context is just being created.
> > +	 */
> > +	err = mlx5_mr_btree_init(&sh->mr.cache,
> > +				 MLX5_MR_BTREE_CACHE_N * 2,
> > +				 sh->pci_dev->device.numa_node);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		err = rte_errno;
> > +		goto error;
> > +	}
> >  	LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&mlx5_ibv_list, sh, next);
> >  exit:
> >  	pthread_mutex_unlock(&mlx5_ibv_list_mutex);
> > @@ -283,6 +301,8 @@ struct mlx5_dev_spawn_data {
> >  	assert(rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY);
> >  	if (--sh->refcnt)
> >  		goto exit;
> > +	/* Release created Memory Regions. */
> > +	mlx5_mr_release(sh);
> >  	LIST_REMOVE(sh, next);
> >  	/*
> >  	 *  Ensure there is no async event handler installed.
> > @@ -615,7 +635,10 @@ struct mlx5_dev_spawn_data {
> >  	}
> >  	mlx5_proc_priv_uninit(dev);
> >  	mlx5_mprq_free_mp(dev);
> > -	mlx5_mr_release(dev);
> > +	/* Remove from memory callback device list. */
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&mlx5_shared_data->mem_event_rwlock);
> > +	LIST_REMOVE(priv, mem_event_cb);
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&mlx5_shared_data->mem_event_rwlock);
> 
> I'm almost okay with this patch but I'm concerned about this part. As devices
> sharing the same context is added to the callback list,
> mlx5_mr_mem_event_free_cb() will be called multiple times with the same
> addr/len. This should be redundant and unnecessary. How about adding the
> shared ctx to the list instead?

Yes, you are quite right. The moving mem_event_cb to shared context (i.e.
including shared context to the list instead of priv) was going to be part of the patch.
It seems I just occasionally dropped the last commit (instead of squash) while
rebasing to the new branch.

> 
> >  	assert(priv->sh);
> >  	mlx5_free_shared_dr(priv);
> >  	if (priv->rss_conf.rss_key != NULL)
> > @@ -1493,19 +1516,6 @@ struct mlx5_dev_spawn_data {
> >  		goto error;
> >  	}
> >  	priv->config.flow_prio = err;
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Once the device is added to the list of memory event
> > -	 * callback, its global MR cache table cannot be expanded
> > -	 * on the fly because of deadlock. If it overflows, lookup
> > -	 * should be done by searching MR list linearly, which is slow.
> > -	 */
> > -	err = mlx5_mr_btree_init(&priv->mr.cache,
> > -				 MLX5_MR_BTREE_CACHE_N * 2,
> > -				 eth_dev->device->numa_node);
> > -	if (err) {
> > -		err = rte_errno;
> > -		goto error;
> > -	}
> >  	/* Add device to memory callback list. */
> >  	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&mlx5_shared_data->mem_event_rwlock);
> >  	LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&mlx5_shared_data->mem_event_cb_list,
> > @@ -1702,6 +1712,7 @@ struct mlx5_dev_spawn_data {
> >  			list[ns].ibv_port = i;
> >  			list[ns].ibv_dev = ibv_match[0];
> >  			list[ns].eth_dev = NULL;
> > +			list[ns].pci_dev = pci_dev;
> >  			list[ns].ifindex = mlx5_nl_ifindex
> >  					(nl_rdma, list[ns].ibv_dev->name, i);
> >  			if (!list[ns].ifindex) {
> > @@ -1768,6 +1779,7 @@ struct mlx5_dev_spawn_data {
> >  			list[ns].ibv_port = 1;
> >  			list[ns].ibv_dev = ibv_match[i];
> >  			list[ns].eth_dev = NULL;
> > +			list[ns].pci_dev = pci_dev;
> >  			list[ns].ifindex = 0;
> >  			if (nl_rdma >= 0)
> >  				list[ns].ifindex = mlx5_nl_ifindex diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h index
> > 14c7f3c..8eb1019 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h
> > @@ -257,6 +257,14 @@ struct mlx5_ibv_shared {
> >  	char ibdev_name[IBV_SYSFS_NAME_MAX]; /* IB device name. */
> >  	char ibdev_path[IBV_SYSFS_PATH_MAX]; /* IB device path for
> secondary */
> >  	struct ibv_device_attr_ex device_attr; /* Device properties. */
> > +	struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; /* Backend PCI device. */
> > +	struct { /* Global device shared L3 MR cache. */
> 
> The comment sounds redundant and this structure has not only the global
> cache but also MR list.
OK, I'll try to make the comments more consize.

> 
> > +		uint32_t dev_gen; /* Generation number to flush local
> caches. */
> > +		rte_rwlock_t rwlock; /* MR Lock. */
> > +		struct mlx5_mr_btree cache; /* Global MR cache table. */
> > +		struct mlx5_mr_list mr_list; /* Registered MR list. */
> > +		struct mlx5_mr_list mr_free_list; /* Freed MR list. */
> > +	} mr;
> >  	/* Shared DV/DR flow data section. */
> >  	pthread_mutex_t dv_mutex; /* DV context mutex. */
> >  	uint32_t dv_refcnt; /* DV/DR data reference counter. */ @@ -323,13
> > +331,6 @@ struct mlx5_priv {
> >  	struct mlx5_flows ctrl_flows; /* Control flow rules. */
> >  	LIST_HEAD(counters, mlx5_flow_counter) flow_counters;
> >  	/* Flow counters. */
> > -	struct {
> > -		uint32_t dev_gen; /* Generation number to flush local
> caches. */
> > -		rte_rwlock_t rwlock; /* MR Lock. */
> > -		struct mlx5_mr_btree cache; /* Global MR cache table. */
> > -		struct mlx5_mr_list mr_list; /* Registered MR list. */
> > -		struct mlx5_mr_list mr_free_list; /* Freed MR list. */
> > -	} mr;
> >  	LIST_HEAD(rxq, mlx5_rxq_ctrl) rxqsctrl; /* DPDK Rx queues. */
> >  	LIST_HEAD(rxqibv, mlx5_rxq_ibv) rxqsibv; /* Verbs Rx queues. */
> >  	LIST_HEAD(hrxq, mlx5_hrxq) hrxqs; /* Verbs Hash Rx queues. */ diff
> > --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c index
> > a3732d4..5140cc2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.c
> > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >
> >  /**
> >   * Expand B-tree table to a given size. Can't be called with holding
> > - * memory_hotplug_lock or priv->mr.rwlock due to rte_realloc().
> > + * memory_hotplug_lock or sh->mr.rwlock due to rte_realloc().
> >   *
> >   * @param bt
> >   *   Pointer to B-tree structure.
> > @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  		n = mr_find_next_chunk(mr, &entry, n);
> >  		if (!entry.end)
> >  			break;
> > -		if (mr_btree_insert(&priv->mr.cache, &entry) < 0) {
> > +		if (mr_btree_insert(&priv->sh->mr.cache, &entry) < 0) {
> >  			/*
> >  			 * Overflowed, but the global table cannot be
> expanded
> >  			 * because of deadlock.
> > @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  	struct mlx5_mr *mr;
> >
> >  	/* Iterate all the existing MRs. */
> > -	LIST_FOREACH(mr, &priv->mr.mr_list, mr) {
> > +	LIST_FOREACH(mr, &priv->sh->mr.mr_list, mr) {
> >  		unsigned int n;
> >
> >  		if (mr->ms_n == 0)
> > @@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  	      uintptr_t addr)
> >  {
> >  	struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
> > +	struct mlx5_ibv_shared *sh = priv->sh;
> >  	uint16_t idx;
> >  	uint32_t lkey = UINT32_MAX;
> >  	struct mlx5_mr *mr;
> > @@ -430,10 +431,10 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  	 * has to be searched by traversing the original MR list instead, which
> >  	 * is very slow path. Otherwise, the global cache is all inclusive.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (!unlikely(priv->mr.cache.overflow)) {
> > -		lkey = mr_btree_lookup(&priv->mr.cache, &idx, addr);
> > +	if (!unlikely(sh->mr.cache.overflow)) {
> > +		lkey = mr_btree_lookup(&sh->mr.cache, &idx, addr);
> >  		if (lkey != UINT32_MAX)
> > -			*entry = (*priv->mr.cache.table)[idx];
> > +			*entry = (*sh->mr.cache.table)[idx];
> >  	} else {
> >  		/* Falling back to the slowest path. */
> >  		mr = mr_lookup_dev_list(dev, entry, addr); @@ -468,13
> +469,12 @@
> > struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  /**
> >   * Release resources of detached MR having no online entry.
> >   *
> > - * @param dev
> > - *   Pointer to Ethernet device.
> > + * @param sh
> > + *   Pointer to Ethernet device shared context.
> >   */
> >  static void
> > -mlx5_mr_garbage_collect(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > +mlx5_mr_garbage_collect(struct mlx5_ibv_shared *sh)
> >  {
> > -	struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
> >  	struct mlx5_mr *mr_next;
> >  	struct mlx5_mr_list free_list = LIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(free_list);
> >
> > @@ -484,11 +484,11 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  	 * MR can't be freed with holding the lock because rte_free() could
> call
> >  	 * memory free callback function. This will be a deadlock situation.
> >  	 */
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	/* Detach the whole free list and release it after unlocking. */
> > -	free_list = priv->mr.mr_free_list;
> > -	LIST_INIT(&priv->mr.mr_free_list);
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	free_list = sh->mr.mr_free_list;
> > +	LIST_INIT(&sh->mr.mr_free_list);
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	/* Release resources. */
> >  	mr_next = LIST_FIRST(&free_list);
> >  	while (mr_next != NULL) {
> > @@ -548,12 +548,12 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  		      dev->data->port_id, (void *)addr);
> >  		return UINT32_MAX;
> >  	}
> > -	rte_rwlock_read_lock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_read_lock(&priv->sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	/* Fill in output data. */
> >  	mr_lookup_dev(dev, entry, addr);
> >  	/* Lookup can't fail. */
> >  	assert(entry->lkey != UINT32_MAX);
> > -	rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&priv->sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	DEBUG("port %u MR CREATED by primary process for %p:\n"
> >  	      "  [0x%" PRIxPTR ", 0x%" PRIxPTR "), lkey=0x%x",
> >  	      dev->data->port_id, (void *)addr, @@ -582,6 +582,7 @@ struct
> > mr_update_mp_data {
> >  		       uintptr_t addr)
> >  {
> >  	struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
> > +	struct mlx5_ibv_shared *sh = priv->sh;
> >  	struct mlx5_dev_config *config = &priv->config;
> >  	struct rte_mem_config *mcfg = rte_eal_get_configuration()-
> >mem_config;
> >  	const struct rte_memseg_list *msl;
> > @@ -602,12 +603,12 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  		dev->data->port_id, (void *)addr);
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Release detached MRs if any. This can't be called with holding
> either
> > -	 * memory_hotplug_lock or priv->mr.rwlock. MRs on the free list
> have
> > +	 * memory_hotplug_lock or sh->mr.rwlock. MRs on the free list have
> >  	 * been detached by the memory free event but it couldn't be
> released
> >  	 * inside the callback due to deadlock. As a result, releasing resources
> >  	 * is quite opportunistic.
> >  	 */
> > -	mlx5_mr_garbage_collect(dev);
> > +	mlx5_mr_garbage_collect(sh);
> >  	/*
> >  	 * If enabled, find out a contiguous virtual address chunk in use, to
> >  	 * which the given address belongs, in order to register maximum
> range.
> > @@ -710,7 +711,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  		goto alloc_resources;
> >  	}
> >  	assert(data.msl == data_re.msl);
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Check the address is really missing. If other thread already created
> >  	 * one or it is not found due to overflow, abort and return.
> > @@ -721,10 +722,10 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  		 * low-on-memory. Then, this entry will have to be searched
> >  		 * here again.
> >  		 */
> > -		mr_btree_insert(&priv->mr.cache, entry);
> > +		mr_btree_insert(&sh->mr.cache, entry);
> >  		DEBUG("port %u found MR for %p on final lookup, abort",
> >  		      dev->data->port_id, (void *)addr);
> > -		rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +		rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  		rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&mcfg->memory_hotplug_lock);
> >  		/*
> >  		 * Must be unlocked before calling rte_free() because @@ -
> 769,7
> > +770,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  	 * mlx5_alloc_buf_extern() which eventually calls rte_malloc_socket()
> >  	 * through mlx5_alloc_verbs_buf().
> >  	 */
> > -	mr->ibv_mr = mlx5_glue->reg_mr(priv->sh->pd, (void *)data.start,
> len,
> > +	mr->ibv_mr = mlx5_glue->reg_mr(sh->pd, (void *)data.start, len,
> >  				       IBV_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE);
> >  	if (mr->ibv_mr == NULL) {
> >  		DEBUG("port %u fail to create a verbs MR for address (%p)",
> @@
> > -779,7 +780,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  	}
> >  	assert((uintptr_t)mr->ibv_mr->addr == data.start);
> >  	assert(mr->ibv_mr->length == len);
> > -	LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&priv->mr.mr_list, mr, mr);
> > +	LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&sh->mr.mr_list, mr, mr);
> >  	DEBUG("port %u MR CREATED (%p) for %p:\n"
> >  	      "  [0x%" PRIxPTR ", 0x%" PRIxPTR "),"
> >  	      " lkey=0x%x base_idx=%u ms_n=%u, ms_bmp_n=%u", @@ -
> 792,11
> > +793,11 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  	mr_lookup_dev(dev, entry, addr);
> >  	/* Lookup can't fail. */
> >  	assert(entry->lkey != UINT32_MAX);
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&mcfg->memory_hotplug_lock);
> >  	return entry->lkey;
> >  err_mrlock:
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  err_memlock:
> >  	rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&mcfg->memory_hotplug_lock);
> >  err_nolock:
> > @@ -854,14 +855,15 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> > mr_rebuild_dev_cache(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)  {
> >  	struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
> > +	struct mlx5_ibv_shared *sh = priv->sh;
> >  	struct mlx5_mr *mr;
> >
> >  	DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "port %u rebuild dev cache[]", dev->data-
> >port_id);
> >  	/* Flush cache to rebuild. */
> > -	priv->mr.cache.len = 1;
> > -	priv->mr.cache.overflow = 0;
> > +	sh->mr.cache.len = 1;
> > +	sh->mr.cache.overflow = 0;
> >  	/* Iterate all the existing MRs. */
> > -	LIST_FOREACH(mr, &priv->mr.mr_list, mr)
> > +	LIST_FOREACH(mr, &sh->mr.mr_list, mr)
> >  		if (mr_insert_dev_cache(dev, mr) < 0)
> >  			return;
> >  }
> > @@ -888,6 +890,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> > mlx5_mr_mem_event_free_cb(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, const void *addr,
> > size_t len)  {
> >  	struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
> > +	struct mlx5_ibv_shared *sh = priv->sh;
> >  	const struct rte_memseg_list *msl;
> >  	struct mlx5_mr *mr;
> >  	int ms_n;
> > @@ -901,7 +904,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  	assert((uintptr_t)addr == RTE_ALIGN((uintptr_t)addr, msl->page_sz));
> >  	assert(len == RTE_ALIGN(len, msl->page_sz));
> >  	ms_n = len / msl->page_sz;
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	/* Clear bits of freed memsegs from MR. */
> >  	for (i = 0; i < ms_n; ++i) {
> >  		const struct rte_memseg *ms;
> > @@ -928,7 +931,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  		rte_bitmap_clear(mr->ms_bmp, pos);
> >  		if (--mr->ms_n == 0) {
> >  			LIST_REMOVE(mr, mr);
> > -			LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&priv->mr.mr_free_list, mr, mr);
> > +			LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&sh->mr.mr_free_list, mr, mr);
> >  			DEBUG("port %u remove MR(%p) from list",
> >  			      dev->data->port_id, (void *)mr);
> >  		}
> > @@ -949,12 +952,12 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  		 * generation below) will be guaranteed to be seen by other
> core
> >  		 * before the core sees the newly allocated memory.
> >  		 */
> > -		++priv->mr.dev_gen;
> > +		++sh->mr.dev_gen;
> >  		DEBUG("broadcasting local cache flush, gen=%d",
> > -		      priv->mr.dev_gen);
> > +		      sh->mr.dev_gen);
> >  		rte_smp_wmb();
> >  	}
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
> > @@ -1013,6 +1016,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  		   struct mlx5_mr_cache *entry, uintptr_t addr)  {
> >  	struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
> > +	struct mlx5_ibv_shared *sh = priv->sh;
> >  	struct mlx5_mr_btree *bt = &mr_ctrl->cache_bh;
> >  	uint16_t idx;
> >  	uint32_t lkey;
> > @@ -1021,12 +1025,12 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  	if (unlikely(bt->len == bt->size))
> >  		mr_btree_expand(bt, bt->size << 1);
> >  	/* Look up in the global cache. */
> > -	rte_rwlock_read_lock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > -	lkey = mr_btree_lookup(&priv->mr.cache, &idx, addr);
> > +	rte_rwlock_read_lock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> > +	lkey = mr_btree_lookup(&sh->mr.cache, &idx, addr);
> >  	if (lkey != UINT32_MAX) {
> >  		/* Found. */
> > -		*entry = (*priv->mr.cache.table)[idx];
> > -		rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +		*entry = (*sh->mr.cache.table)[idx];
> > +		rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  		/*
> >  		 * Update local cache. Even if it fails, return the found entry
> >  		 * to update top-half cache. Next time, this entry will be
> found @@
> > -1035,7 +1039,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  		mr_btree_insert(bt, entry);
> >  		return lkey;
> >  	}
> > -	rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	/* First time to see the address? Create a new MR. */
> >  	lkey = mlx5_mr_create(dev, entry, addr);
> >  	/*
> > @@ -1261,6 +1265,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  	struct mr_update_mp_data *data = opaque;
> >  	struct rte_eth_dev *dev = data->dev;
> >  	struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
> > +	struct mlx5_ibv_shared *sh = priv->sh;
> >  	struct mlx5_mr_ctrl *mr_ctrl = data->mr_ctrl;
> >  	struct mlx5_mr *mr = NULL;
> >  	uintptr_t addr = (uintptr_t)memhdr->addr; @@ -1270,9 +1275,9 @@
> > struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >
> >  	assert(rte_eal_process_type() == RTE_PROC_PRIMARY);
> >  	/* If already registered, it should return. */
> > -	rte_rwlock_read_lock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_read_lock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	lkey = mr_lookup_dev(dev, &entry, addr);
> > -	rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	if (lkey != UINT32_MAX)
> >  		return;
> >  	DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "port %u register MR for chunk #%d of mempool
> (%s)",
> > @@ -1286,11 +1291,11 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  		data->ret = -1;
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > -	LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&priv->mr.mr_list, mr, mr);
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> > +	LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&sh->mr.mr_list, mr, mr);
> >  	/* Insert to the global cache table. */
> >  	mr_insert_dev_cache(dev, mr);
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	/* Insert to the local cache table */
> >  	mlx5_mr_addr2mr_bh(dev, mr_ctrl, addr);  } @@ -1345,6 +1350,7
> @@
> > struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  	struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> >  	struct mlx5_mr *mr;
> >  	struct mlx5_priv *priv;
> > +	struct mlx5_ibv_shared *sh;
> >
> >  	dev = pci_dev_to_eth_dev(pdev);
> >  	if (!dev) {
> > @@ -1361,11 +1367,12 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  		rte_errno = EINVAL;
> >  		return -1;
> >  	}
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > -	LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&priv->mr.mr_list, mr, mr);
> > +	sh = priv->sh;
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> > +	LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&sh->mr.mr_list, mr, mr);
> >  	/* Insert to the global cache table. */
> >  	mr_insert_dev_cache(dev, mr);
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -1390,6 +1397,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {  {
> >  	struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
> >  	struct mlx5_priv *priv;
> > +	struct mlx5_ibv_shared *sh;
> >  	struct mlx5_mr *mr;
> >  	struct mlx5_mr_cache entry;
> >
> > @@ -1401,10 +1409,11 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  		return -1;
> >  	}
> >  	priv = dev->data->dev_private;
> > -	rte_rwlock_read_lock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	sh = priv->sh;
> > +	rte_rwlock_read_lock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	mr = mr_lookup_dev_list(dev, &entry, (uintptr_t)addr);
> >  	if (!mr) {
> > -		rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +		rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  		DRV_LOG(WARNING, "address 0x%" PRIxPTR " wasn't
> registered "
> >  				 "to PCI device %p", (uintptr_t)addr,
> >  				 (void *)pdev);
> > @@ -1412,7 +1421,7 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  		return -1;
> >  	}
> >  	LIST_REMOVE(mr, mr);
> > -	LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&priv->mr.mr_free_list, mr, mr);
> > +	LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&sh->mr.mr_free_list, mr, mr);
> >  	DEBUG("port %u remove MR(%p) from list", dev->data->port_id,
> >  	      (void *)mr);
> >  	mr_rebuild_dev_cache(dev);
> > @@ -1425,11 +1434,11 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  	 * generation below) will be guaranteed to be seen by other core
> >  	 * before the core sees the newly allocated memory.
> >  	 */
> > -	++priv->mr.dev_gen;
> > +	++sh->mr.dev_gen;
> >  	DEBUG("broadcasting local cache flush, gen=%d",
> > -			priv->mr.dev_gen);
> > +			sh->mr.dev_gen);
> 
> Looks indentation was wrong even before your change.
> Please correct it.
OK.

> 
> Thanks,
> Yongseok
> 
Thank you for review,
Best Regards,
Slava

> >  	rte_smp_wmb();
> > -	rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -1550,25 +1559,24 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  /**
> >   * Dump all the created MRs and the global cache entries.
> >   *
> > - * @param dev
> > - *   Pointer to Ethernet device.
> > + * @param sh
> > + *   Pointer to Ethernet device shared context.
> >   */
> >  void
> > -mlx5_mr_dump_dev(struct rte_eth_dev *dev __rte_unused)
> > +mlx5_mr_dump_dev(struct mlx5_ibv_shared *sh __rte_unused)
> >  {
> >  #ifndef NDEBUG
> > -	struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
> >  	struct mlx5_mr *mr;
> >  	int mr_n = 0;
> >  	int chunk_n = 0;
> >
> > -	rte_rwlock_read_lock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	rte_rwlock_read_lock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	/* Iterate all the existing MRs. */
> > -	LIST_FOREACH(mr, &priv->mr.mr_list, mr) {
> > +	LIST_FOREACH(mr, &sh->mr.mr_list, mr) {
> >  		unsigned int n;
> >
> > -		DEBUG("port %u MR[%u], LKey = 0x%x, ms_n = %u,
> ms_bmp_n = %u",
> > -		      dev->data->port_id, mr_n++,
> > +		DEBUG("device %s MR[%u], LKey = 0x%x, ms_n = %u,
> ms_bmp_n = %u",
> > +		      sh->ibdev_name, mr_n++,
> >  		      rte_cpu_to_be_32(mr->ibv_mr->lkey),
> >  		      mr->ms_n, mr->ms_bmp_n);
> >  		if (mr->ms_n == 0)
> > @@ -1583,45 +1591,40 @@ struct mr_update_mp_data {
> >  			      chunk_n++, ret.start, ret.end);
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > -	DEBUG("port %u dumping global cache", dev->data->port_id);
> > -	mlx5_mr_btree_dump(&priv->mr.cache);
> > -	rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	DEBUG("device %s dumping global cache", sh->ibdev_name);
> > +	mlx5_mr_btree_dump(&sh->mr.cache);
> > +	rte_rwlock_read_unlock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  #endif
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
> > - * Release all the created MRs and resources. Remove device from
> > memory callback
> > + * Release all the created MRs and resources for shared device context.
> >   * list.
> >   *
> > - * @param dev
> > - *   Pointer to Ethernet device.
> > + * @param sh
> > + *   Pointer to Ethernet device shared context.
> >   */
> >  void
> > -mlx5_mr_release(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > +mlx5_mr_release(struct mlx5_ibv_shared *sh)
> >  {
> > -	struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
> >  	struct mlx5_mr *mr_next;
> >
> > -	/* Remove from memory callback device list. */
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&mlx5_shared_data->mem_event_rwlock);
> > -	LIST_REMOVE(priv, mem_event_cb);
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&mlx5_shared_data->mem_event_rwlock);
> >  	if (rte_log_get_level(mlx5_logtype) == RTE_LOG_DEBUG)
> > -		mlx5_mr_dump_dev(dev);
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +		mlx5_mr_dump_dev(sh);
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_lock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	/* Detach from MR list and move to free list. */
> > -	mr_next = LIST_FIRST(&priv->mr.mr_list);
> > +	mr_next = LIST_FIRST(&sh->mr.mr_list);
> >  	while (mr_next != NULL) {
> >  		struct mlx5_mr *mr = mr_next;
> >
> >  		mr_next = LIST_NEXT(mr, mr);
> >  		LIST_REMOVE(mr, mr);
> > -		LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&priv->mr.mr_free_list, mr, mr);
> > +		LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&sh->mr.mr_free_list, mr, mr);
> >  	}
> > -	LIST_INIT(&priv->mr.mr_list);
> > +	LIST_INIT(&sh->mr.mr_list);
> >  	/* Free global cache. */
> > -	mlx5_mr_btree_free(&priv->mr.cache);
> > -	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&priv->mr.rwlock);
> > +	mlx5_mr_btree_free(&sh->mr.cache);
> > +	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(&sh->mr.rwlock);
> >  	/* Free all remaining MRs. */
> > -	mlx5_mr_garbage_collect(dev);
> > +	mlx5_mr_garbage_collect(sh);
> >  }
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.h b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.h
> > index 786f6a3..89e89b7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_mr.h
> > @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct mlx5_mr_ctrl {
> >  	struct mlx5_mr_btree cache_bh; /* Cache for bottom-half. */  }
> > __rte_packed;
> >
> > +struct mlx5_ibv_shared;
> >  extern struct mlx5_dev_list  mlx5_mem_event_cb_list;  extern
> > rte_rwlock_t mlx5_mem_event_rwlock;
> >
> > @@ -76,11 +77,11 @@ void mlx5_mr_mem_event_cb(enum
> rte_mem_event event_type, const void *addr,
> >  			  size_t len, void *arg);
> >  int mlx5_mr_update_mp(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct mlx5_mr_ctrl
> *mr_ctrl,
> >  		      struct rte_mempool *mp);
> > -void mlx5_mr_release(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> > +void mlx5_mr_release(struct mlx5_ibv_shared *sh);
> >
> >  /* Debug purpose functions. */
> >  void mlx5_mr_btree_dump(struct mlx5_mr_btree *bt); -void
> > mlx5_mr_dump_dev(struct rte_eth_dev *dev);
> > +void mlx5_mr_dump_dev(struct mlx5_ibv_shared *sh);
> >
> >  /**
> >   * Look up LKey from given lookup table by linear search. Firstly
> > look up the diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txq.c
> > b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txq.c index 9965b2b..ed82594 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txq.c
> > @@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ struct mlx5_txq_ctrl *
> >  		goto error;
> >  	}
> >  	/* Save pointer of global generation number to check memory event.
> */
> > -	tmpl->txq.mr_ctrl.dev_gen_ptr = &priv->mr.dev_gen;
> > +	tmpl->txq.mr_ctrl.dev_gen_ptr = &priv->sh->mr.dev_gen;
> >  	assert(desc > MLX5_TX_COMP_THRESH);
> >  	tmpl->txq.offloads = conf->offloads |
> >  			     dev->data->dev_conf.txmode.offloads;
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-15  6:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-12 15:45 Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2019-04-12 15:45 ` Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2019-04-12 19:22 ` Yongseok Koh
2019-04-12 19:22   ` Yongseok Koh
2019-04-15  6:42   ` Slava Ovsiienko [this message]
2019-04-15  6:42     ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-04-24  8:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2019-04-24  8:44   ` Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2019-04-24  8:52   ` Yongseok Koh
2019-04-24  8:52     ` Yongseok Koh
2019-04-27  4:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] net/mlx5: share Memory Regions for multiport devices Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2019-04-27  4:32     ` Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2019-04-27  4:32     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] net/mlx5: share Memory Regions for multiport device Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2019-04-27  4:32       ` Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2019-04-27  4:32     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] net/mlx5: update memory event callback for shared context Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2019-04-27  4:32       ` Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2019-04-29  8:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] net/mlx5: share Memory Regions for multiport devices Shahaf Shuler
2019-04-29  8:54       ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-04-24  8:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: update memory event callback for shared context Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2019-04-24  8:48   ` Viacheslav Ovsiienko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM4PR05MB32657B4C24CDDE61454E59E1D22B0@AM4PR05MB3265.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=viacheslavo@mellanox.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
    --cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).