From: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
To: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/mlx5: add inner tunnel items support on E-Switch
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 11:56:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM4PR05MB3265B348FE6C3E4E17483E47D26F0@AM4PR05MB3265.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84256b9d-c183-4f9e-2f28-2ee6ad428032@redhat.com>
Hi, Kevin
> As it's a bit grey, I will backport to 18.11 on the understanding that it will be
> supported by Mellanox and you will test one of the 18.11.1-RC's to make sure
> there are no regressions on the existing behavior - is that reasonable?
>
Yes, it is quite reasonable, I will test it. This code is also merged in 19.02, so
the related problems are not very likely.
WBR,
Slava (aka Viacheslav)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 13:01
> To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>; Shahaf Shuler
> <shahafs@mellanox.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
> <thomas@monjalon.net>; Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>; Luca
> Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/mlx5: add inner tunnel items support
> on E-Switch
>
> On 01/31/2019 04:13 PM, Slava Ovsiienko wrote:
> > Hi, Kevin
> >
>
> Hi Slava,
>
> > It is rather refactoring, not new feature, tunnel inner items support is
> partially present in 18.11.
> > Yes, this patchset is too big to be simple fix, and updates not so much to be
> new feature.
> > It is very early patch (after 18.11 release), just mailed later,
> > rebase on the top was done automatically and quite simple, because it
> > touches merely E-Switch subsystem (merge should not be difficult - mostly
> mlx5_flow_tcf.c is changed) and highly desirable to be backported.
> > It fixes serious bugs with ether_type field, which limit VLAN and VXLAN
> functionality on E-Switch.
> >
>
> The issue I have is it also adding functionality and more importantly
> reworking how some existing behavior is handled (e.g. outer tunnel validation
> moving in 1/5). But, yes, it is completely isolated to mlx5/tcf and applies
> cleanly, so that is a positive.
>
> As it's a bit grey, I will backport to 18.11 on the understanding that it will be
> supported by Mellanox and you will test one of the 18.11.1-RC's to make sure
> there are no regressions on the existing behavior - is that reasonable?
>
> thanks,
> Kevin.
>
> > With best regards,
> > Slava (aka Viacheslav)
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 16:52
> >> To: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>; Shahaf Shuler
> >> <shahafs@mellanox.com>
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon
> >> <thomas@monjalon.net>; Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>; Luca
> >> Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/mlx5: add inner tunnel items
> >> support on E-Switch
> >>
> >> On 12/27/2018 03:34 PM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> >>> The generic Flow rule for tunnels looks like:
> >>>
> >>> flow create <attributes> <port> \
> >>> <tunnel outer items pattern> \
> >>> <tunnel vni item> \
> >>> <tunnel inner items pattern>
> >>>
> >>> Current design supports only L2 addresses as inner pattern items.
> >>> This patchset adds support for L3 (IPv4/IPv6) addresses and L4
> >>> (TCP/UDP) ports items as inner tunnel parameters.
> >>>
> >>> Also this patchset adds support for inner and outer ethernet types
> >>> for the E-Switch Flows with tunnels. Inner and outer ethernet type
> >>> match can be specified with ethernet items, vlan items, or
> >>> implicitly deduced from IP address items. The tcm_info field in
> >>> Netlink message tcm structure is filled always with outer protocol.
> >>>
> >>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi Viacheslav - these are new features, not a bugfixes. Are the
> >> stable@dpdk.org tags intentional?
> >>
> >> From
> >> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdoc
> >> .dp
> >> dk.org%2Fguides%2Fcontributing%2Fstable.html%23what-changes-should-
> be
> >> -
> >>
> backported&data=02%7C01%7Cviacheslavo%40mellanox.com%7C1d6e08
> >>
> fe6f7f47d83f7e08d6878bb56d%7Ca652971c7d2e4d9ba6a4d149256f461b%7C0
> >>
> %7C0%7C636845431441557730&sdata=%2Fmgoj2Il%2Fu4CCrkAcETdoMp
> >> d7Ri5ash%2FUhzGv1dLXLY%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >> --
> >> Features should not be backported to stable releases. It may be
> >> acceptable, in limited cases, to back port features for the LTS
> >> release
> >> where:
> >>
> >> There is a justifiable use case (for example a new PMD).
> >> The change is non-invasive.
> >> The work of preparing the backport is done by the proposer.
> >> There is support within the community.
> >> --
> >>
> >> Kevin.
> >>
> >>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
> >>>
> >>> Viacheslav Ovsiienko (5):
> >>> net/mlx5: remove checks for outer tunnel items on E-Switch
> >>> net/mlx5: add tunnel inner items validation on E-Switch
> >>> net/mlx5: add tunnel inner items support on E-Switch
> >>> net/mlx5: add ethernet type validation on E-Switch
> >>> net/mlx5: add ethernet type support for tunnels on E-Switch
> >>>
> >>> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_tcf.c | 690
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >>> 1 file changed, 399 insertions(+), 291 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-06 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-27 15:34 [dpdk-stable] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2018-12-27 15:34 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/5] net/mlx5: remove checks for outer tunnel items " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2018-12-27 15:34 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/5] net/mlx5: add tunnel inner items validation " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2018-12-27 15:34 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 3/5] net/mlx5: add tunnel inner items support " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2018-12-27 15:34 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 4/5] net/mlx5: add ethernet type validation " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2018-12-27 15:34 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 5/5] net/mlx5: add ethernet type support for tunnels " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2019-01-13 12:11 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] net/mlx5: add inner tunnel items support " Shahaf Shuler
2019-01-31 14:52 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-01-31 16:13 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2019-02-06 11:00 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-02-06 11:56 ` Slava Ovsiienko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AM4PR05MB3265B348FE6C3E4E17483E47D26F0@AM4PR05MB3265.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
--to=viacheslavo@mellanox.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).