From: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>
To: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"viktorin@rehivetech.com" <viktorin@rehivetech.com>,
"bruce.richardson@intel.com" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"jerinjacobk@gmail.com" <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>,
"juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech" <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] net/hns3: refactor SVE code compile method
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 05:38:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM5PR0802MB24656C2D6AB287E03FBBF9309E269@AM5PR0802MB2465.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad6ae02b-1bc7-bcb5-b4ac-bdf41d6dd7dc@huawei.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2021 2:53 PM
> To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; thomas@monjalon.net;
> ferruh.yigit@intel.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; jerinj@marvell.com; viktorin@rehivetech.com;
> bruce.richardson@intel.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; jerinjacobk@gmail.com;
> juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] net/hns3: refactor SVE code compile method
>
>
>
> On 2021/5/21 13:21, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> >> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2021 6:55 PM
> >> To: Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; thomas@monjalon.net;
> >> ferruh.yigit@intel.com
> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; jerinj@marvell.com; viktorin@rehivetech.com;
> >> bruce.richardson@intel.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> >> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; jerinjacobk@gmail.com;
> >> juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech; nd <nd@arm.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] net/hns3: refactor SVE code compile
> >> method
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2021/5/20 16:24, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2021 9:26 PM
> >>>> To: thomas@monjalon.net; ferruh.yigit@intel.com
> >>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; jerinj@marvell.com; Ruifeng Wang
> >>>> <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; viktorin@rehivetech.com;
> >>>> bruce.richardson@intel.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> >>>> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; jerinjacobk@gmail.com;
> >>>> juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech; nd <nd@arm.com>
> >>>> Subject: [PATCH v6 2/2] net/hns3: refactor SVE code compile method
> >>>>
> >>>> Currently, the SVE code is compiled only when -march supports SVE
> >>>> (e.g. '- march=armv8.2a+sve'), there maybe some problem[1] with
> >>>> this
> >> approach.
> >>>>
> >>>> The solution:
> >>>> a. If the minimum instruction set support SVE then compiles it.
> >>>> b. Else if the compiler support SVE then compiles it.
> >>>> c. Otherwise don't compile it.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-April/208189.html
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: 8c25b02b082a ("net/hns3: fix enabling SVE Rx/Tx")
> >>>> Fixes: 952ebacce4f2 ("net/hns3: support SVE Rx")
> >>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng <fengchengwen@huawei.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c | 2 +- drivers/net/hns3/meson.build
> >>>> |
> >>>> 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c
> >>>> b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c index 1d7a769..4ef20c6 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.c
> >>>> @@ -2808,7 +2808,7 @@ hns3_get_default_vec_support(void)
> >>>> static bool
> >>>> hns3_get_sve_support(void)
> >>>> {
> >>>> -#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64) && defined(__ARM_FEATURE_SVE)
> >>>> +#if defined(CC_SVE_SUPPORT)
> >>>> if (rte_vect_get_max_simd_bitwidth() < RTE_VECT_SIMD_256)
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_SVE))
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/meson.build
> >>>> b/drivers/net/hns3/meson.build index 53c7df7..5f9af9b 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/net/hns3/meson.build
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/hns3/meson.build
> >>>> @@ -35,7 +35,26 @@ deps += ['hash']
> >>>>
> >>>> if arch_subdir == 'arm' and dpdk_conf.get('RTE_ARCH_64')
> >>>> sources += files('hns3_rxtx_vec.c')
> >>>> - if cc.get_define('__ARM_FEATURE_SVE', args: machine_args) != ''
> >>>> +
> >>>> + # compile SVE when:
> >>>> + # a. support SVE in minimum instruction set baseline
> >>>> + # b. it's not minimum instruction set, but compiler support
> >>>> + if cc.get_define('__ARM_FEATURE_SVE', args: machine_args) != ''
> >>>> + and
> >>>> cc.check_header('arm_sve.h')
> >>>> + cflags += ['-DCC_SVE_SUPPORT']
> >>> With SVE build fix patch [1], CC_SVE_ACLE_SUPPORT will be defined.
> >>> Here we can use CC_SVE_ACLE_SUPPORT and not to add a new one.
> >>>
> >>
> >> The CC_SVE_ACLE_SUPPORT was defined under default machine_args
> which
> >> support SVE, it can't deals with the situation: the default
> >> machine_args don't support SVE but compiler support SVE.
> >> So the CC_SVE_SUPPORT marco is necessary.
> > Agree that macro for SVE is also needed here. And we can also use '-
> DCC_SVE_ACLE_SUPPORT' here right?
> > I think there is no difference between CC_SVE_ACLE_SUPPORT and
> CC_SVE_SUPPORT when they are used in source code.
> > IMO the same macro name can be used, and it removes redundancy and
> confusion.
> >
>
> You are right, no difference between CC_SVE_ACLE_SUPPORT and
> CC_SVE_SUPPORT But the hns3 sve already support 20.11, and
> CC_SVE_ACLE_SUPPORT was newly defined, there maybe some problems
> when backporting.
20.11 release has no machine enabled SVE extension.
>
> Or we could redefine CC_SVE_ACLE_SUPPORT under default machine_args:
> if cc.get_define('__ARM_FEATURE_SVE', args: machine_args) != '' and
> cc.check_header('arm_sve.h')
> cflags += ['-DCC_SVE_ACLE_SUPPORT']
'if dpdk_conf.get(CC_SVE_ACLE_SUPPORT)' should be fine?
Stable branch has no SVE enabled in machine_args.
> sources += files('hns3_rxtx_vec_sve.c')
> elif cc.has_argument('-march=armv8.2-a+sve') and
> cc.check_header('arm_sve.h')
> sve_cflags = ['-DCC_SVE_ACLE_SUPPORT']
This is fine. Macro name is consistent.
> foreach flag: cflags
> # filterout -march -mcpu -mtune
> if not (flag.startswith('-march=') or flag.startswith('-mcpu=') or
> flag.startswith('-mtune='))
> sve_cflags += flag
> endif
> endforeach
> but this way may introduce coupling, I think.
>
> >>
> >>> [1]
> >>> http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1621495007-28387-1-git-se
> >>> nd
> >>> -email-fengchengwen@huawei.com/
> >>>
> >>>> sources += files('hns3_rxtx_vec_sve.c')
> >>>> + elif cc.has_argument('-march=armv8.2-a+sve') and
> >>>> cc.check_header('arm_sve.h')
> >>>> + sve_cflags = ['-DCC_SVE_SUPPORT']
> >>>> + foreach flag: cflags
> >>>> + # filterout -march -mcpu -mtune
> >>>> + if not (flag.startswith('-march=') or
> >>>> + flag.startswith('-mcpu=') or
> >>>> flag.startswith('-mtune='))
> >>>> + sve_cflags += flag
> >>>> + endif
> >>>> + endforeach
> >>>> + hns3_sve_lib = static_library('hns3_sve_lib',
> >>>> + 'hns3_rxtx_vec_sve.c',
> >>>> + dependencies: [static_rte_ethdev],
> >>>> + include_directories: includes,
> >>>> + c_args: [sve_cflags, '-march=armv8.2-a+sve'])
> >>>> + objs +=
> >>>> + hns3_sve_lib.extract_objects('hns3_rxtx_vec_sve.c')
> >>>> endif
> >>>> endif
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.8.1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> .
> >>>
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-24 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-12 8:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] bugfix for Kunpeng930 SVE compile Chengwen Feng
2021-05-12 8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] config/arm: add non-SVE march for soc kunpeng930 Chengwen Feng
2021-05-12 8:44 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-05-12 23:00 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-13 4:49 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-12 8:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/hns3: refactor SVE code compile method Chengwen Feng
2021-05-12 23:12 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-12 23:21 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-13 0:51 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-13 20:42 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-13 10:04 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-05-13 4:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] bugfix for Kunpeng SVE compile Chengwen Feng
2021-05-13 4:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] config/arm: select best -march parameter for kunpeng soc Chengwen Feng
2021-05-13 4:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/hns3: refactor SVE code compile method Chengwen Feng
2021-05-13 6:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] bugfix for Kunpeng SVE compile Chengwen Feng
2021-05-13 6:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] config/arm: select most suitable -march for kunpeng soc Chengwen Feng
2021-05-13 6:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] net/hns3: refactor SVE code compile method Chengwen Feng
2021-05-13 13:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] bugfix for Kunpeng SVE compile Chengwen Feng
2021-05-13 13:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] config/arm: select most suitable -march for kunpeng soc Chengwen Feng
2021-05-13 15:24 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-05-13 23:12 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-14 10:23 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-18 13:25 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-18 13:45 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-05-13 13:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] net/hns3: refactor SVE code compile method Chengwen Feng
2021-05-13 22:19 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-14 2:53 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-14 9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] bugfix for Kunpeng SVE compile Chengwen Feng
2021-05-14 9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] config/arm: select most suitable -march for kunpeng soc Chengwen Feng
2021-05-14 9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] net/hns3: refactor SVE code compile method Chengwen Feng
2021-05-14 14:12 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-18 12:41 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-18 13:11 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-18 13:12 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-18 13:24 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-18 16:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-19 0:23 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-19 8:08 ` David Marchand
2021-05-19 9:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-19 12:16 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-19 12:37 ` David Marchand
2021-05-19 13:35 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-18 14:40 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-18 15:15 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-05-18 16:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-18 15:48 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-18 16:00 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-18 16:12 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-18 16:37 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-19 0:18 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-19 13:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] bugfix for Kunpeng SVE compile Chengwen Feng
2021-05-19 13:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] config/arm: select most suitable -march for kunpeng soc Chengwen Feng
2021-05-19 14:05 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-05-20 22:38 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-19 13:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] net/hns3: refactor SVE code compile method Chengwen Feng
2021-05-19 15:02 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-20 1:11 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-20 7:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-20 8:24 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-05-20 10:55 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-21 5:21 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-05-21 6:53 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-24 5:38 ` Ruifeng Wang [this message]
2021-05-24 8:43 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-24 10:03 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-05-24 13:15 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-24 13:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/2] bugfix for Kunpeng SVE compile Chengwen Feng
2021-05-24 13:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/2] config/arm: select most suitable -march for kunpeng soc Chengwen Feng
2021-05-24 13:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/2] net/hns3: refactor SVE code compile method Chengwen Feng
2021-05-24 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/2] bugfix for Kunpeng SVE compile Chengwen Feng
2021-05-24 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/2] config/arm: select most suitable -march for kunpeng soc Chengwen Feng
2021-06-17 7:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-06-17 23:33 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-06-21 0:52 ` fengchengwen
2021-06-23 8:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-06-23 8:24 ` fengchengwen
2021-05-24 13:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/2] net/hns3: refactor SVE code compile method Chengwen Feng
2021-05-25 6:04 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-05-27 7:07 ` Fengchengwen
2021-06-12 7:09 ` fengchengwen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AM5PR0802MB24656C2D6AB287E03FBBF9309E269@AM5PR0802MB2465.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viktorin@rehivetech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).