DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
To: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>
Cc: "pbhagavatula@marvell.com" <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
	Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/6] eventdev: support to set queue attributes at runtime
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:58:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BL3PR11MB5699C703B56731DC9F9500EDD71F9@BL3PR11MB5699.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159a14ece2480a3704ee34ee0d81dda331c16957.1648549553.git.sthotton@marvell.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 2:11 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; jerinj@marvell.com
> Cc: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>; pbhagavatula@marvell.com; Ray
> Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/6] eventdev: support to set queue attributes at runtime

<snip>

> +/**
> + * Set an event queue attribute at runtime.
> + *
> + * @param dev
> + *   Event device pointer
> + * @param queue_id
> + *   Event queue index
> + * @param attr_id
> + *   Event queue attribute id
> + * @param attr_value
> + *   Event queue attribute value
> + *
> + * @return
> + *  - 0: Success.
> + *  - <0: Error code on failure.
> + */
> +typedef int (*eventdev_queue_attr_set_t)(struct rte_eventdev *dev,
> +					 uint8_t queue_id, uint32_t attr_id,
> +					 uint32_t attr_value);

Is using a uint64_t a better type for attr_value? Given there might be more in future,
limiting to 32-bits now may cause headaches later, and uint64_t doesn't cost extra?

I think 32-bits of attr_id is enough :)

Same comment on the _get() API in patch 2/6, a uint64_t * would be a better fit there in my opinion.

<snip>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-30 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-29 13:10 [PATCH 0/6] Extend and set event " Shijith Thotton
2022-03-29 13:11 ` [PATCH 1/6] eventdev: support to set " Shijith Thotton
2022-03-30 10:58   ` Van Haaren, Harry [this message]
2022-04-04  9:35     ` Shijith Thotton
2022-04-04  9:45       ` Van Haaren, Harry
2022-03-30 12:14   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-04-04 11:45     ` Shijith Thotton
2022-03-29 13:11 ` [PATCH 2/6] eventdev: add weight and affinity to queue attributes Shijith Thotton
2022-03-30 12:12   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-04-04  9:33     ` Shijith Thotton
2022-03-29 13:11 ` [PATCH 3/6] doc: announce change in event queue conf structure Shijith Thotton
2022-03-29 13:11 ` [PATCH 4/6] test/event: test cases to test runtime queue attribute Shijith Thotton
2022-03-29 13:11 ` [PATCH 5/6] event/cnxk: support to set runtime queue attributes Shijith Thotton
2022-03-30 11:05   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2022-04-04  7:59     ` Shijith Thotton
2022-03-29 13:11 ` [PATCH 6/6] common/cnxk: use lock when accessing mbox of SSO Shijith Thotton
2022-03-29 18:49 ` [PATCH 0/6] Extend and set event queue attributes at runtime Jerin Jacob
2022-03-30 10:52   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2022-04-04  7:57     ` Shijith Thotton
2022-04-05  5:40 ` [PATCH v2 " Shijith Thotton
2022-04-05  5:40   ` [PATCH v2 1/6] eventdev: support to set " Shijith Thotton
2022-05-09 12:43     ` Jerin Jacob
2022-04-05  5:40   ` [PATCH v2 2/6] eventdev: add weight and affinity to queue attributes Shijith Thotton
2022-05-09 12:46     ` Jerin Jacob
2022-04-05  5:41   ` [PATCH v2 3/6] doc: announce change in event queue conf structure Shijith Thotton
2022-05-09 12:47     ` Jerin Jacob
2022-05-15 10:24     ` [PATCH v3] " Shijith Thotton
2022-07-12 14:05       ` Jerin Jacob
2022-07-13  6:52         ` [EXT] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2022-07-13  8:55         ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-07-13  9:56           ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2022-07-17 12:52       ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-04-05  5:41   ` [PATCH v2 4/6] test/event: test cases to test runtime queue attribute Shijith Thotton
2022-05-09 12:55     ` Jerin Jacob
2022-04-05  5:41   ` [PATCH v2 5/6] event/cnxk: support to set runtime queue attributes Shijith Thotton
2022-05-09 12:57     ` Jerin Jacob
2022-04-05  5:41   ` [PATCH v2 6/6] common/cnxk: use lock when accessing mbox of SSO Shijith Thotton
2022-04-11 11:07   ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Extend and set event queue attributes at runtime Shijith Thotton
2022-05-15  9:53   ` [PATCH v3 0/5] " Shijith Thotton
2022-05-15  9:53     ` [PATCH v3 1/5] eventdev: support to set " Shijith Thotton
2022-05-15 13:11       ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-05-16  3:57         ` Shijith Thotton
2022-05-16 10:23           ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-05-16 12:12             ` Shijith Thotton
2022-05-15  9:53     ` [PATCH v3 2/5] eventdev: add weight and affinity to queue attributes Shijith Thotton
2022-05-15  9:53     ` [PATCH v3 3/5] test/event: test cases to test runtime queue attribute Shijith Thotton
2022-05-15  9:53     ` [PATCH v3 4/5] common/cnxk: use lock when accessing mbox of SSO Shijith Thotton
2022-05-15  9:53     ` [PATCH v3 5/5] event/cnxk: support to set runtime queue attributes Shijith Thotton
2022-05-16 17:35     ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Extend and set event queue attributes at runtime Shijith Thotton
2022-05-16 17:35       ` [PATCH v4 1/5] eventdev: support to set " Shijith Thotton
2022-05-16 18:02         ` Jerin Jacob
2022-05-17  8:55           ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-05-17 13:35             ` Jerin Jacob
2022-05-19  8:49         ` Ray Kinsella
2022-05-16 17:35       ` [PATCH v4 2/5] eventdev: add weight and affinity to queue attributes Shijith Thotton
2022-05-16 17:35       ` [PATCH v4 3/5] test/event: test cases to test runtime queue attribute Shijith Thotton
2022-05-16 17:35       ` [PATCH v4 4/5] common/cnxk: use lock when accessing mbox of SSO Shijith Thotton
2022-05-16 17:35       ` [PATCH v4 5/5] event/cnxk: support to set runtime queue attributes Shijith Thotton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BL3PR11MB5699C703B56731DC9F9500EDD71F9@BL3PR11MB5699.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
    --cc=sthotton@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).