From: "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
To: mattias.ronnblom <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Honnappa Nagarahalli" <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/6] service: reduce statistics overhead for parallel services
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 13:03:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN0PR11MB57125B943807B39456AFD4FFD75B9@BN0PR11MB5712.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e777e82a-28a5-f9a2-bd56-f40ed4a70fc4@ericsson.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mattias Rönnblom <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>
> Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 12:37 PM
> To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>; Van Haaren, Harry
> <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>;
> Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] service: reduce statistics overhead for parallel services
<snip>
> > Now, looking at this series, without a cover letter, I had to guess.
> > I saw it is linked to the v1 patch.
> > I "assumed" it was then an alternative, since you had comments on
> > Harry v3 patch, or at least Harry would reply and we could conclude.
> >
>
> Sorry for failing to mention enough context in the patchset. I assumed
> it was Harry and not you that would resolve this issue. Harry's patchset
> fixes the statistics bug related to MT safe services, but does not
> address the performance issue discussed. So Harry's patchset makes sense
> on its own. It also adds a performance test case.
>
> I believe the test case is the only thing left of Harry's improvements
> after my patchset is applied.
>
> My patchset was meant as an improvement on what Harry already had done,
> not as an alternative.
>
> This is all up the maintainer of course, but it seems to me that Harry's
> patchset should go in first, and then mine.
>
> If Harry or you so prefer, I can rework my patchset to apply cleanly
> against current main (i.e., w/o Harry's patches).
I'd like to keep the performance unit-test, but otherwise your patchset is good with me.
(Will test/review the series asap).
> > So what do we do?
> > Should I understand that your comments on Harry series can be ignored
> > and I proceed with all this?
> >
>
> My comments were minor, except those that relates to the issue that my
> follow-up patchset addresses.
>
> > I hope it applies cleanly.
I have no strong opinion here; whatever is easier for maintainers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-03 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-08 12:56 [PATCH 1/2] test/service: add perf measurements for with stats mode Harry van Haaren
2022-07-08 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] service: fix potential stats race-condition on MT services Harry van Haaren
2022-07-08 13:23 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-08 13:44 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2022-07-08 14:14 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-08 13:48 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-07-08 15:16 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-07-08 15:31 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2022-07-08 16:21 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-07-08 16:33 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-07-08 20:02 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-07-08 16:29 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-08 16:45 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-07-08 17:22 ` Morten Brørup
2022-07-08 17:39 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-07-08 18:08 ` Morten Brørup
2022-09-06 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] service: reduce statistics overhead for parallel services Mattias Rönnblom
2022-09-06 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] service: introduce per-lcore cycles counter Mattias Rönnblom
2022-09-06 16:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] service: reduce average case service core overhead Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-03 13:33 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2022-10-03 14:32 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-09-06 16:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] service: tweak cycle statistics semantics Mattias Rönnblom
2022-09-07 8:41 ` Morten Brørup
2022-10-03 13:45 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2022-09-06 16:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] event/sw: report idle when no work is performed Mattias Rönnblom
2022-09-06 16:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] service: provide links to functions in documentation Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-03 8:06 ` [PATCH 1/6] service: reduce statistics overhead for parallel services David Marchand
2022-10-03 8:40 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-03 9:53 ` David Marchand
2022-10-03 11:37 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-03 13:03 ` Van Haaren, Harry [this message]
2022-10-03 13:33 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2022-10-03 14:37 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Service cores performance and statistics improvements Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] service: reduce statistics overhead for parallel services Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] service: introduce per-lcore cycles counter Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] service: reduce average case service core overhead Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] service: tweak cycle statistics semantics Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] event/sw: report idle when no work is performed Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] service: provide links to functions in documentation Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-05 9:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Service cores performance and statistics improvements Morten Brørup
2022-10-05 10:14 ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-10-05 13:39 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BN0PR11MB57125B943807B39456AFD4FFD75B9@BN0PR11MB5712.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).