From: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/ip_fragmentation: Enabling IP checksum offload in mbuf
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 08:09:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN8PR18MB26912BD787C0D63FB5CC0FCBB4060@BN8PR18MB2691.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725801616357D4@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
Hi,
Regards
Sunil Kumar Kori
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
>Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2019 8:51 PM
>To: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>Subject: [EXT] RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/ip_fragmentation:
>Enabling IP checksum offload in mbuf
>
>External Email
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Sunil Kumar Kori
>> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 12:42 PM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: skori@marvell.com
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/ip_fragmentation: Enabling IP
>checksum offload in mbuf
>>
>> As per the documentation to use any IP offload features, application
>> must set required offload flags into mbuf->ol_flags.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>
>> ---
>> examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c | 7 +++++--
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c
>b/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c
>> index e90a61e..d821967 100644
>> --- a/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c
>> +++ b/examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c
>> @@ -354,10 +354,13 @@ struct rte_lpm6_config lpm6_config = {
>>
>> /* src addr */
>> ether_addr_copy(&ports_eth_addr[port_out], ð_hdr-
>>s_addr);
>> - if (ipv6)
>> + if (ipv6) {
>> eth_hdr->ether_type =
>rte_be_to_cpu_16(ETHER_TYPE_IPv6);
>> - else
>> + m->ol_flags |= PKT_TX_IPV6;
>
>Is there is any point to do that?
>This sample app, as I remember doesn't request any extra HW offloads.
>Same comment for patch #3.
>Konstantin
>
>
Is this comment valid for IPv6 only ?
Otherwise for IPv4, it is required as IP checksum is neither being updated by library nor
by the application.
>> + } else {
>> eth_hdr->ether_type =
>rte_be_to_cpu_16(ETHER_TYPE_IPv4);
>> + m->ol_flags |= (PKT_TX_IPV4 | PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> len += len2;
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-20 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-16 11:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Removing PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM from fragmentation/reassembly lib Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-16 11:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] lib/librte_ip_frag: Remove PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM offload flags Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-16 11:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] examples/ip_fragmentation: Enabling IP checksum offload in mbuf Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-16 11:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] examples/ip_reassembly: " Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-16 11:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Removing PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM from fragmentation/reassembly lib Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-16 11:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] lib/librte_ip_frag: Remove PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM offload flags Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-18 15:18 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-06-26 21:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-07-04 16:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-07-05 8:31 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-16 11:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/ip_fragmentation: Enabling IP checksum offload in mbuf Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-18 15:21 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-20 8:09 ` Sunil Kumar Kori [this message]
2019-05-20 8:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-20 10:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] " Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-20 10:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] examples/ip_reassembly: " Sunil Kumar Kori
2019-05-20 11:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-05-20 11:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] examples/ip_fragmentation: " Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-07-08 4:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/librte_ip_frag: remove IP checkum offload flag jerinj
2019-07-08 4:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] examples/ip_fragmentation: enable IP checksum offload jerinj
2019-07-08 4:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] examples/ip_reassembly: " jerinj
2019-07-08 9:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lib/librte_ip_frag: remove IP checkum offload flag Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-16 11:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] examples/ip_reassembly: Enabling IP checksum offload in mbuf Sunil Kumar Kori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BN8PR18MB26912BD787C0D63FB5CC0FCBB4060@BN8PR18MB2691.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=skori@marvell.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).