DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rongwei Liu <rongweil@nvidia.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
	Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
	Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
	"NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
	Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 01/11] ethdev: add flex item modify field support
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 04:29:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN9PR12MB527353193D22A9F32576D308ABD39@BN9PR12MB5273.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ba49f25-52d0-fe07-02e6-22a71e0fbe13@oktetlabs.ru>

Hi Andrew

BR
Rongwei

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2023 17:08
> To: Rongwei Liu <rongweil@nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>;
> Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>;
> NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL) <thomas@monjalon.net>; Aman
> Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Yuying Zhang
> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>; Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] ethdev: add flex item modify field support
> 
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On 1/19/23 07:58, Rongwei Liu wrote:
> > Add flex item as modify field destination.
> > Add "struct rte_flow_item_flex_handle *flex_handle" into "struct
> > rte_flow_action_modify_data" as union with existed "level" member.
> > This new member is dedicated for modifying flex item.
> >
> > Add flex item modify field cmdline support. Now user can use testpmd
> > cli to specify which flex item to be modified, either source or
> > destination.
> >
> > Syntax is as below:
> > modify_field op set dst_type flex_item dst_level 0 dst_offset 16
> > src_type value src_value 0x123456781020 width 8
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rongwei Liu <rongweil@nvidia.com>
> > Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_03.rst
> > b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_03.rst
> > index b8c5b68d6c..c673205e5e 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_03.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_03.rst
> > @@ -56,6 +56,10 @@ New Features
> >        =======================================================
> >
> >
> 
> It should be just one empty line here
> 
Sure.
> > +* ethdev: added a new field:
> 
> "added a new field' is too generic.
> 
> > +
> > +  - modify flex item: ``rte_flow_action_modify_data.flex_handle``
> > +
> 
> And two empty lines here.
> 
Sure.
> >   Removed Items
> >   -------------
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h index
> > b60987db4b..c66a65351d 100644
> > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > @@ -3528,6 +3528,7 @@ enum rte_flow_field_id {
> >       RTE_FLOW_FIELD_IPV6_ECN,        /**< IPv6 ECN. */
> >       RTE_FLOW_FIELD_GTP_PSC_QFI,     /**< GTP QFI. */
> >       RTE_FLOW_FIELD_METER_COLOR,     /**< Meter color marker. */
> > +     RTE_FLOW_FIELD_FLEX_ITEM,       /**< Flex item. */
> >   };
> >
> >   /**
> > @@ -3541,8 +3542,11 @@ struct rte_flow_action_modify_data {
> >       RTE_STD_C11
> >       union {
> >               struct {
> > -                     /** Encapsulation level or tag index. */
> > -                     uint32_t level;
> > +                     /**< Encapsulation level or tag index or flex
> > + item handle. */
> 
> Have you tried to generate documentation? If it is a union documentation it
> should be /**, not /**<.
Sure. Sorry, I followed wrong existed examples.
> In general, it is better to document union from overall point of view. What is it
> logically? Do not define union as just a union of its fields.
Currently, 'flex_handle' is documents in rte_flow.rst file " table:: destination/source field definition" as a new row.  
From API aspect, when modifying flex item, user should specify the pointer of the flex item instead of ID.
That' why it was added as a union. 
> 
> > +                     union {
> > +                             uint32_t level;
> > +                             struct rte_flow_item_flex_handle
> > + *flex_handle;
> 
> Union items documentation missing.
See above. Do we need another place to document the union again?
> 
> > +                     };
> >                       /** Number of bits to skip from a field. */
> >                       uint32_t offset;
> >               };


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-30  4:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-21  8:39 [RFC 0/9] support flex item matching and modify field Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21  8:39 ` [RFC 1/9] ethdev: add flex item modify field support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-11 16:34   ` Ori Kam
2023-01-19  4:58   ` [PATCH v2 00/11] add flex item support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19  4:58     ` [PATCH v2 01/11] ethdev: add flex item modify field support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-20  9:07       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-01-30  4:29         ` Rongwei Liu [this message]
2023-01-30  4:35         ` Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30  4:52         ` [PATCH v3 00/11] add flex item support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30  4:52           ` [PATCH v3 01/11] ethdev: add flex item modify field support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30  4:52           ` [PATCH v3 02/11] app/testpmd: pass flex handle into matching mask Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30  4:52           ` [PATCH v3 03/11] net/mlx5: enable hws flex item create Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30  4:52           ` [PATCH v3 04/11] net/mlx5: add IPv6 protocol as flex item input Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30  4:52           ` [PATCH v3 05/11] net/mlx5: adopt new flex item prm definition Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30  4:52           ` [PATCH v3 06/11] net/mlx5/hws: add hws flex item matching support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30  4:52           ` [PATCH v3 07/11] net/mlx5: add flex item modify field implementation Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30  4:52           ` [PATCH v3 08/11] net/mlx5: return error for sws modify field Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30  4:53           ` [PATCH v3 09/11] app/testpmd: raw encap with flex item support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30  4:53           ` [PATCH v3 10/11] doc/mlx5: update mlx5 doc Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30  4:53           ` [PATCH v3 11/11] app/testpmd: adjust cleanup sequence when quitting Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 13:19         ` [PATCH v3 00/11] add flex item support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 13:19           ` [PATCH v3 01/11] ethdev: add flex item modify field support Rongwei Liu
2023-02-02  2:59             ` Rongwei Liu
2023-02-06  3:39             ` [PATCH v4 0/4] add flex item support Rongwei Liu
2023-02-06  3:39               ` [PATCH v4 1/4] ethdev: add flex item modify field support Rongwei Liu
2023-02-09 15:55                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-06  3:39               ` [PATCH v4 2/4] app/testpmd: pass flex handle into matching mask Rongwei Liu
2023-02-06  3:39               ` [PATCH v4 3/4] app/testpmd: raw encap with flex item support Rongwei Liu
2023-02-06  3:39               ` [PATCH v4 4/4] app/testpmd: adjust cleanup sequence when quitting Rongwei Liu
2023-02-09 14:49               ` [PATCH v4 0/4] add flex item support Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-30 13:19           ` [PATCH v3 02/11] app/testpmd: pass flex handle into matching mask Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 13:19           ` [PATCH v3 03/11] net/mlx5: enable hws flex item create Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 13:19           ` [PATCH v3 04/11] net/mlx5: add IPv6 protocol as flex item input Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 13:19           ` [PATCH v3 05/11] net/mlx5: adopt new flex item prm definition Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 13:19           ` [PATCH v3 06/11] net/mlx5/hws: add hws flex item matching support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 13:19           ` [PATCH v3 07/11] net/mlx5: add flex item modify field implementation Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 13:19           ` [PATCH v3 08/11] net/mlx5: return error for sws modify field Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 13:19           ` [PATCH v3 09/11] app/testpmd: raw encap with flex item support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 13:19           ` [PATCH v3 10/11] doc/mlx5: update mlx5 doc Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 13:20           ` [PATCH v3 11/11] app/testpmd: adjust cleanup sequence when quitting Rongwei Liu
2023-02-03 11:00             ` Singh, Aman Deep
2023-01-19  4:58     ` [PATCH v2 02/11] app/testpmd: pass flex handle into matching mask Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19  4:58     ` [PATCH v2 03/11] net/mlx5: enable hws flex item create Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19  4:58     ` [PATCH v2 04/11] net/mlx5: add IPv6 protocol as flex item input Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19  4:58     ` [PATCH v2 05/11] net/mlx5: adopt new flex item prm definition Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19  4:58     ` [PATCH v2 06/11] net/mlx5/hws: add hws flex item matching support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19  4:58     ` [PATCH v2 07/11] net/mlx5: add flex item modify field implementation Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19  4:58     ` [PATCH v2 08/11] net/mlx5: return error for sws modify field Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19  4:58     ` [PATCH v2 09/11] app/testpmd: raw encap with flex item support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19  4:58     ` [PATCH v2 10/11] doc/mlx5: update mlx5 doc Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19  4:58     ` [PATCH v2 11/11] app/testpmd: adjust cleanup sequence when quitting Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21  8:39 ` [RFC 2/9] app/testpmd: add flex item modify field cmdline support Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21  8:39 ` [RFC 3/9] app/testpmd: pass flex handle into matching mask Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21  8:39 ` [RFC 4/9] net/mlx5: enable hws flex item create Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21  8:39 ` [RFC 5/9] net/mlx5: add IPv6 protocol as flex item input Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21  8:39 ` [RFC 6/9] net/mlx5/hws: add hws flex item matching support Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21  8:39 ` [RFC 7/9] net/mlx5/hws: add flex item modify field implementation Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21  8:39 ` [RFC 8/9] net/mlx5: return error for sws modify field Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21  8:40 ` [RFC 9/9] app/testpmd: raw encap with flex item support Rongwei Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BN9PR12MB527353193D22A9F32576D308ABD39@BN9PR12MB5273.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=rongweil@nvidia.com \
    --cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).