From: Rongwei Liu <rongweil@nvidia.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
"NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/8] ethdev: add IPv6 routing extension header definition
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 03:46:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN9PR12MB52737D8ECAD595F67DD99D6FABD39@BN9PR12MB5273.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5da6632a-0976-dc1f-facb-f778c8aad8e6@oktetlabs.ru>
HI Andrew
BR
Rongwei
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2023 17:21
> To: Rongwei Liu <rongweil@nvidia.com>; Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>;
> Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>; Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>;
> NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL) <thomas@monjalon.net>; Aman
> Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>; Yuying Zhang
> <yuying.zhang@intel.com>; Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>; Olivier
> Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] ethdev: add IPv6 routing extension header
> definition
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 1/19/23 06:11, Rongwei Liu wrote:
> > Add IPv6 routing extension header definition and no TLV support for
> > now.
> >
> > At rte_flow layer, there are new items defined for matching
> > type/nexthdr/segments_left field.
> >
> > Add command line support for IPv6 routing extension header
> > matching: type/nexthdr/segment_list.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rongwei Liu <rongweil@nvidia.com>
> > Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
>
> [snip]
>
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > index 3e6242803d..ae99036be0 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst
> > @@ -1544,6 +1544,15 @@ Matches Color Marker set by a Meter.
> >
> > - ``color``: Metering color marker.
> >
> > +Item: ``IPV6_ROUTING_EXT``
> > +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > +
> > +Matches ipv6 routing extension header.
>
> ipv6 -> IPv6
Sure.
>
> > +
> > +- ``next_hdr``: Next layer header type.
> > +- ``type``: IPv6 routing extension header type.
> > +- ``segments_left``: How many IPv6 destination addresses carries on
>
> Why are only 3 fields mentioned above?
>
This is the 1st phase to matching the 1st uint32 of IPv6 routing extension.
No need to match hdr_len since TLV is ignored.
> > +
> > Actions
> > ~~~~~~~
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_03.rst
> > b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_03.rst
> > index b8c5b68d6c..2a794d598e 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_03.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_23_03.rst
> > @@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ New Features
> > Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin.
> > =======================================================
> >
> > +* **Added rte_flow support for matching IPv6 routing extension header
> > +fields.**
> > +
> > + Added ``ipv6_routing_ext`` items in rte_flow to match IPv6 routing
> > + extension header
>
> Missing full stop above.
>
Sure
> > +
> >
> > Removed Items
> > -------------
> > @@ -84,6 +89,11 @@ API Changes
> > Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin.
> > =======================================================
> >
> > +* ethdev: added a new structure:
> > +
> > + - IPv6 routing extension header ``rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext`` and
> > + ``rte_ipv6_routing_ext``
> > +
>
> If I'm not mistaken, additions should not be here. It is not an API change.
>
Checked existing release doc, "ihl" and "version" of IPv4 header is added here but with "net:" prefix.
Do you think it' good to follow?
> >
> > ABI Changes
> > -----------
> > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c index
> > 7d0c24366c..4074b475c8 100644
> > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
> > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.c
> > @@ -76,6 +76,20 @@ rte_flow_item_flex_conv(void *buf, const void *data)
> > return src->length;
> > }
> >
> > +static size_t
> > +rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext_conv(void *buf, const void *data) {
> > + struct rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext *dst = buf;
> > + const struct rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext *src = data;
> > + size_t len;
> > +
> > + len = src->hdr.hdr_len ? src->hdr.hdr_len << 3 :
> > + src->hdr.segments_left << 4;
>
> Compare hdr_len vs 0 explicitly.
> Also I'd add parenthesis around ternary operator values to make it simpler to
> understand.
Sure.
>
> > + if (buf)
>
> Please, compare vs NULL explicitly. May be 'dst' would be better here?
>
> > + rte_memcpy((void *)((uintptr_t)(dst->hdr.segments)),
> > + src->hdr.segments, len);
> > + return len;
> > +}
> > +
Sure.
> > /** Generate flow_item[] entry. */
> > #define MK_FLOW_ITEM(t, s) \
> > [RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ ## t] = { \ @@ -157,6 +171,8 @@ static
> > const struct rte_flow_desc_data rte_flow_desc_item[] = {
> > MK_FLOW_ITEM(L2TPV2, sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_l2tpv2)),
> > MK_FLOW_ITEM(PPP, sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_ppp)),
> > MK_FLOW_ITEM(METER_COLOR, sizeof(struct
> > rte_flow_item_meter_color)),
> > + MK_FLOW_ITEM_FN(IPV6_ROUTING_EXT, sizeof(struct
> rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext),
> > + rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext_conv),
> > };
> >
> > /** Generate flow_action[] entry. */ diff --git
> > a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h index
> > b60987db4b..0120d3e7d2 100644
> > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > @@ -624,6 +624,13 @@ enum rte_flow_item_type {
> > * See struct rte_flow_item_meter_color.
> > */
> > RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_METER_COLOR,
> > +
> > + /**
> > + * Matches the presence of IPv6 routing extension header.
> > + *
> > + * See struct rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext.
>
> @see
>
Sure. Looks like there are so many existing wrong usages "See struct" in this file.
> > + */
> > + RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT,
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -873,6 +880,18 @@ struct rte_flow_item_ipv6 {
> > uint32_t reserved:23;
> > };
> >
> > +/**
> > + * @warning
> > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this structure may change without prior notice
> > + *
> > + * RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6_ROUTING_EXT.
> > + *
> > + * Matches an IPv6 routing extension header.
> > + */
> > +struct rte_flow_item_ipv6_routing_ext {
> > + struct rte_ipv6_routing_ext hdr; };
> > +
>
> What about default mask?
Tried to add default mask declaration in this file but got "unused variable" warning.
Moved it to "cmdline_flow.c" since it' only used in testpmd encap logic.
>
> > /** Default mask for RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6. */
> > #ifndef __cplusplus
> > static const struct rte_flow_item_ipv6 rte_flow_item_ipv6_mask = {
> > diff --git a/lib/net/rte_ip.h b/lib/net/rte_ip.h index
> > 9c8e8206f0..158a2f83ce 100644
> > --- a/lib/net/rte_ip.h
> > +++ b/lib/net/rte_ip.h
> > @@ -539,6 +539,27 @@ struct rte_ipv6_hdr {
> > uint8_t dst_addr[16]; /**< IP address of destination host(s). */
> > } __rte_packed;
> >
> > +/**
> > + * IPv6 Routing Extension Header
> > + */
> > +struct rte_ipv6_routing_ext {
> > + uint8_t next_hdr; /**< Protocol, next header. */
> > + uint8_t hdr_len; /**< Header length. */
> > + uint8_t type; /**< Extension header type. */
> > + uint8_t segments_left; /**< Valid segments number. */
> > + __extension__
> > + union {
> > + uint32_t flags;
>
> rte_be32_t ?
Sure.
>
> > + struct {
> > + uint8_t last_entry; /**< The last_entry field of SRH */
> > + uint8_t flag; /**< Packet flag. */
> > + uint16_t tag; /**< Packet tag. */
>
> rte_be16_t
Sure.
>
> > + };
> > + };
> > + __extension__
> > + uint32_t segments[0]; /**< Each hop IPv6 address. */
>
> rte_be32_t
Sure.
>
> > +} __rte_packed;
> > +
> > /* IPv6 vtc_flow: IPv / TC / flow_label */
> > #define RTE_IPV6_HDR_FL_SHIFT 0
> > #define RTE_IPV6_HDR_TC_SHIFT 20
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-30 3:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-21 8:42 [RFC 0/9] support ipv6 routing header matching Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21 8:42 ` [RFC 1/9] ethdev: add IPv6 routing extension header definition Rongwei Liu
2023-01-16 16:15 ` Ori Kam
2023-01-17 2:50 ` Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19 3:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] add IPv6 routing extension support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19 3:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ethdev: add IPv6 routing extension header definition Rongwei Liu
2023-01-20 9:20 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-01-30 3:46 ` Rongwei Liu [this message]
2023-01-30 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] add IPv6 routing extension support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ethdev: add IPv6 routing extension header definition Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 16:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-01-31 2:03 ` Rongwei Liu
2023-01-31 2:27 ` Rongwei Liu
2023-01-31 2:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-01-31 3:20 ` Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 16:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-01-31 2:05 ` Rongwei Liu
2023-01-31 3:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-01-31 3:24 ` Rongwei Liu
2023-01-31 9:18 ` Rongwei Liu
2023-01-31 9:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-31 11:42 ` Ori Kam
2023-01-31 9:36 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] add IPv6 routing extension support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-31 9:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: add IPv6 routing extension header definition Rongwei Liu
2023-02-01 9:21 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-02-01 9:27 ` Rongwei Liu
2023-02-01 9:31 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-02-01 11:35 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] add IPv6 routing extension support Rongwei Liu
2023-02-01 11:35 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ethdev: add IPv6 routing extension header definition Rongwei Liu
2023-02-01 11:39 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-02-01 13:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-02-02 10:00 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] add IPv6 routing extension support Rongwei Liu
2023-02-02 10:00 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] ethdev: add IPv6 routing extension header definition Rongwei Liu
2023-02-02 10:00 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] ethdev: add modify IPv6 protocol field Rongwei Liu
2023-02-02 10:00 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] app/testpmd: add IPv6 routing extension header in raw encap Rongwei Liu
2023-02-03 18:36 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] add IPv6 routing extension support Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-01 11:35 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] ethdev: add modify IPv6 protocol field Rongwei Liu
2023-02-01 11:39 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-02-01 16:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-02-02 2:12 ` Rongwei Liu
2023-02-01 11:35 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] app/testpmd: add IPv6 routing extension header in raw encap Rongwei Liu
2023-01-31 9:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ethdev: add modify IPv6 protocol field Rongwei Liu
2023-02-01 9:14 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2023-01-31 9:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] app/testpmd: add IPv6 routing extension header in raw encap Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] net/mlx5: adopt IPv6 routing extension prm definition Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] net/mlx5/hws: Definer, add mlx5dr context to definer_conv_data Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] net/mlx5/hws: add IPv6 routing extension matching support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] app/testpmd: add IPv6 routing extension header in raw encap Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] ethdev: add modify IPv6 protocol field Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] net/mlx5: add modify IPv6 protocol implementation Rongwei Liu
2023-01-30 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] doc/mlx5: add IPv6 routing extension matching docs Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19 3:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] net/mlx5: adopt IPv6 routing extension prm definition Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19 3:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] net/mlx5/hws: Definer, add mlx5dr context to definer_conv_data Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19 3:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] net/mlx5/hws: add IPv6 routing extension matching support Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19 3:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] app/testpmd: add IPv6 routing extension header in raw encap Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19 3:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] ethdev: add modify IPv6 protocol field Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19 3:11 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] net/mlx5: add modify IPv6 protocol implementation Rongwei Liu
2023-01-19 3:11 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] doc/mlx5: add IPv6 routing extension matching docs Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21 8:42 ` [RFC 2/9] app/testpmd: add IPv6 routing extension header support Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21 8:42 ` [RFC 3/9] net/mlx5: adopt new flex item definition Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21 8:42 ` [RFC 4/9] net/mlx5/hws: Definer, add mlx5dr context to definer_conv_data Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21 8:43 ` [RFC 5/9] net/mlx5/hws: add IPv6 routing extension matching support Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21 8:43 ` [RFC 6/9] app/testpmd: add IPv6 routing extension header in raw encap Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21 8:43 ` [RFC 7/9] ethdev: add modify IPv6 protocol field Rongwei Liu
2023-01-16 16:20 ` Ori Kam
2022-12-21 8:43 ` [RFC 8/9] app/testpmd: add modify IPv6 protocol command line Rongwei Liu
2022-12-21 8:43 ` [RFC 9/9] net/mlx5/hws: add modify IPv6 protocol implementation Rongwei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BN9PR12MB52737D8ECAD595F67DD99D6FABD39@BN9PR12MB5273.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=rongweil@nvidia.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
--cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).