From: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] virtio: Tx performance improvements
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 01:56:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4B144C55@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151027085212.24ce7e5e@samsung9>
On 10/27/2015 7:52 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:00:38 +0000
> "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Why use merge-able rx header here in the tx region?
>>> If mergeable rx is negotiated then the header must be used for
>>> both Tx and Rx. I chose to allocate the largest possible header
>>> needed, rather than having to deal with variable size data structure.
>> Our original code is also using merge-able header for TX descriptor if
>> this negotiated.
>> I checked the virtio spec, all of the merge-able header is about
>> receiving buffers, which is expected. That is why i feel weird here.
>> Maybe not a big deal?
> Since num_buffers is only in merge-able header, the negotiation is implied
> to be symmetric.
>
Can we come to the conclusion that in tx case, we use merge-able header
though number_buffers is not used at all?
> Reading 0.95 spec
>
> Under "Packet Transmission"
> 3. If the driver negotatied the VIRTIO_NET_F_MGR_RXBUF feature
> the num_buffers field is set to zero.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-27 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 5:16 Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] virtio: clean up space checks on xmit Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 8:02 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-19 15:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 16:27 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-19 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] virtio: don't use unlikely for normal tx stuff Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] virtio: use indirect ring elements Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 13:19 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-19 15:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 16:18 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-30 18:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-19 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] virtio: use any layout on transmit Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 16:28 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-19 16:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 16:56 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-26 23:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 17:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] virtio: optimize transmit enqueue Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-20 1:48 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-21 13:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] virtio: Tx performance improvements Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-22 10:38 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-22 12:13 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-22 16:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-23 9:00 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-26 23:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-27 1:56 ` Xie, Huawei [this message]
2015-10-27 2:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-27 2:38 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-26 14:05 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-01-05 8:10 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-01-06 12:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-14 13:49 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-03-04 6:18 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-03-04 18:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-08 1:38 ` Xie, Huawei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4B144C55@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=huawei.xie@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).