DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Troitsky, Nikita" <nikita.troitsky@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] virtio: return 1 to tell the upper layer we don't take over this device
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 07:53:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C61AD14@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1870056.1ZGr9B153f@xps13>

On 3/1/2016 3:18 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi Huawei,
>
> 2016-02-26 09:53, Huawei Xie:
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
>> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>>  /*-
>> +
> This new line seems useless :)

Sorry, would fix.

>
>>   *   BSD LICENSE
>>   *
> [...]
>> @@ -1037,8 +1039,11 @@ eth_virtio_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
>>  
>>  	pci_dev = eth_dev->pci_dev;
>>  
>> -	if (vtpci_init(pci_dev, hw) < 0)
>> -		return -1;
>> +	ret = vtpci_init(pci_dev, hw);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		rte_free(eth_dev->data->mac_addrs);
> The freeing seems not related to this patch.

I can send a separate patch, ok within this patchset?

>
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
> [...]
>>  	PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO, "trying with legacy virtio pci.");
>> -	if (legacy_virtio_resource_init(dev, hw) < 0)
>> +	if (legacy_virtio_resource_init(dev, hw) < 0) {
>> +		if (dev->kdrv == RTE_KDRV_UNKNOWN) {
>> +			PMD_INIT_LOG(INFO,
>> +				"skip kernel managed virtio device.");
>> +			return 1;
>> +		}
>>  		return -1;
>> +	}
> You cannot skip a device if it was whitelisted.
> I think you should check RTE_DEVTYPE_WHITELISTED_PCI and throw an error
> in this case.

I feel there is a subtle difference on the understanding of -w args. To
me, without it, probe all devices; with it, only probe whiltelisted API.
That is all.
Do you mean that -w implies that devices whitelisted must be probed
successfully otherwise we throw an error? If i get it right, then what
about the devices whitelisted but without PMD driver?

I will fix, :).
if (dev->kdrv == RTE_KDRV_UNKNOWN && dev->devargs->type !=
RTE_DEVTYPE_WHITELISTED_PCI) {
        ....
        return 1;
}
   

>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-01  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-22  3:50 [dpdk-dev] [Question] How pmd virtio works without UIO? Peter Xu
2015-12-22  7:00 ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-22  8:23   ` Peter Xu
2015-12-22  8:32     ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-22  9:56       ` Peter Xu
2015-12-22 10:47         ` Xie, Huawei
2015-12-22 10:53           ` Xie, Huawei
2015-12-22 11:39           ` Peter Xu
2015-12-22 14:31             ` Xie, Huawei
2015-12-22 16:38             ` Xie, Huawei
2015-12-23  1:55               ` Peter Xu
2015-12-23  2:09                 ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-23  2:38                   ` Peter Xu
2015-12-23 22:26                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-24  3:30                     ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-24 17:56                       ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-12-23  2:01         ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-23  2:41           ` Peter Xu
2015-12-23  2:58             ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-23  5:13               ` Xie, Huawei
2015-12-23 22:20                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-24 18:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] check if any kernel driver is manipulating the virtio device Huawei Xie
2015-12-24 18:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] eal: make the comment more accurate Huawei Xie
2015-12-24 18:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] eal: set kdrv to RTE_KDRV_NONE if kernel driver isn't manipulating the device Huawei Xie
2015-12-28 20:24     ` David Marchand
2015-12-24 18:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] virtio: return 1 to tell the upper layer we don't take over this device Huawei Xie
2015-12-28  5:25     ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-28  5:38       ` Xie, Huawei
2015-12-24 18:38   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] virtio: check if any kernel driver is manipulating the device Huawei Xie
2015-12-28  5:26     ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-28  5:29       ` Xie, Huawei
2016-01-04  9:02     ` Xie, Huawei
2016-01-04 17:29       ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-01-05 14:44       ` Panu Matilainen
2015-12-28  3:08   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] check if any kernel driver is manipulating the virtio device Peter Xu
2016-01-03 17:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] fix the issue that DPDK takes over virtio device blindly Huawei Xie
2016-01-03 17:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] eal: make the comment more accurate Huawei Xie
2016-01-03 17:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] eal: set kdrv to RTE_KDRV_NONE if kernel driver isn't manipulating the device Huawei Xie
2016-01-03 17:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] virtio: return 1 to tell the upper layer we don't take over this device Huawei Xie
2016-01-03 17:56   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] virtio: check if any kernel driver is manipulating the virtio device Huawei Xie
2016-01-04 17:24     ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-01-04 17:56       ` Xie, Huawei
2016-01-05  1:56         ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-01-07 13:17         ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-07 14:17     ` Panu Matilainen
2016-01-27 12:43       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-04 17:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] fix the issue that DPDK takes over virtio device blindly Stephen Hemminger
2016-01-12  3:02     ` Xie, Huawei
2016-01-12  4:23       ` Santosh Shukla
2016-01-12  5:16         ` Xie, Huawei
2016-01-13 12:17           ` Santosh Shukla
2016-01-27 15:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Huawei Xie
2016-01-27 15:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] eal: make the comment more accurate Huawei Xie
2016-01-27 15:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] eal: set kdrv to RTE_KDRV_NONE if kernel driver isn't manipulating the device Huawei Xie
2016-01-27 15:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] virtio: return 1 to tell the upper layer we don't take over this device Huawei Xie
2016-01-27 15:21   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] virtio: check if kernel driver is manipulating the virtio device Huawei Xie
2016-01-28  9:55     ` Panu Matilainen
2016-01-29  7:40   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] fix the issue that DPDK takes over virtio device blindly Yuanhan Liu
2016-02-24 12:43   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-26  6:09     ` Xie, Huawei
2016-02-26  8:40       ` David Marchand
2016-02-26  9:00         ` Xie, Huawei
2016-02-26  1:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Huawei Xie
2016-02-26  1:53   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] eal: make the comment more accurate Huawei Xie
2016-02-29  8:48     ` David Marchand
2016-02-26  1:53   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] eal: set kdrv to RTE_KDRV_NONE if kernel driver isn't managing the device Huawei Xie
2016-02-29  2:34     ` Xie, Huawei
2016-02-29  8:46     ` David Marchand
2016-02-29  9:00       ` Xie, Huawei
2016-02-29  9:05         ` David Marchand
2016-02-26  1:53   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] eal: call pci_ioport_map when " Huawei Xie
2016-02-29  9:02     ` David Marchand
2016-02-26  1:53   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] virtio: return 1 to tell the upper layer we don't take over this device Huawei Xie
2016-02-29 13:15     ` Santosh Shukla
2016-03-01  7:16     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-01  7:53       ` Xie, Huawei [this message]
2016-03-01  8:20         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-01  8:39           ` Xie, Huawei
2016-03-01  9:55             ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-01 10:08               ` Xie, Huawei
2016-03-08 17:00                 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-03-08 23:01                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-08 15:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/6] fix the issue that DPDK takes over virtio device blindly Huawei Xie
2016-03-08 15:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] eal: make the comment more accurate Huawei Xie
2016-03-08 15:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/6] eal: RTE_KDRV_NONE means kernel driver isn't managing the device Huawei Xie
2016-03-08 15:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/6] eal: use new RTE_ARCH_X86 for x86 arch Huawei Xie
2016-03-09 23:04     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-08 15:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/6] eal: simple code rework Huawei Xie
2016-03-08 15:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/6] eal: map IO port when kernel driver isn't managing the device Huawei Xie
2016-03-08 15:33   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/6] virtio: return 1 to tell the upper layer we don't take over this device Huawei Xie
2016-03-09 23:23     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-09 23:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/6] fix the issue that DPDK takes over virtio device blindly Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C61AD14@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=huawei.xie@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nikita.troitsky@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).