DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Abdullah Ömer Yamaç" <aomeryamac@gmail.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Cc: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	 Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>,
	Sameh Gobriel <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>,
	 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/hash,lib/rcu: feature hidden key count in hash
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 00:51:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+sj1i9iW8E+U7Y+wVJUrZ1cJAgXRTRP363rD4_i_COwV0J+tQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA06E482-DAFA-4AEB-98E5-4500A249149E@arm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9699 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 6:24 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli <
Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On Feb 20, 2024, at 12:58 PM, Abdullah Ömer Yamaç <aomeryamac@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I appreciate that you gave me suggestions and comments. I will make
> changes according to all your recommendations, but before that, I want to
> make everyone's minds clear. Then, I will apply modifications.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 2:35 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli <
> Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 19, 2024, at 3:28 PM, Abdullah Ömer Yamaç <aomeryamac@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Let me explain a use case;
> > >
> > > I have a hash table whose key value is IP addresses, and data (let's
> say the username of the IP) is related to the IP address. The key point is
> matching these data with flows. Flows are dynamic, and this hash table is
> dynamic, as well; both can change anytime. For example, when a flow starts,
> we look up the hash table with the corresponding IP and retrieve the
> username. We need to hold this username until the flow terminates, although
> we removed this IP key from the hash table (multithread). That's why we
> have RCU and defer queue is necessary for high performance. In my
> application, I need to know the number of IP-username entries. These
> numbers can be calculated by rte_hash_count - defer queue size.
> > The entries in the defer queue are not reclaimed (there is a probability
> that all of them can be reclaimed) and hence they are not available for
> allocation. So, rte_hash_count - defer queue size might not give you the
> correct number you are expecting.
> >
> > Currently, there is no API in hash library that forces a reclaim. Does
> it makes sense to have an API that just does the reclaim (and returns the
> number of entries pending in the defer queue)? A call to rte_hash_count
> should provide the exact count you are looking for.
> > You are right; no API in the hash library forces a reclaim. In my
> application, I periodically call rte_count to retrieve hash size, and this
> data is shown in my GUI. So that means I need to call regularly reclaim. I
> am trying to figure out which is better, calling reclaim or retrieving the
> defer queue size. Any comment about this?
> Retrieving the defer queue size will be cheaper. However, calling the
> reclaim API will ensure the entries are freed hence providing an accurate
> number. Calling the reclaim API on an empty defer queue does not consume
> many cycles. If needed we could add a check for empty defer queue in the
> reclaim API and return early.
>
> I am also wondering if a reclaim API in hash library is needed. Why not
> call rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_reclaim API from the application?
>
The reason is simple. struct rte_hash *h is an internal structure and we
cannot access the h->dq. So it is not possible to call reclaim.

>
>
> > >
> > > I think if you need a non-blocking and multithreaded hash table, an
> RCU-enabled hash table is necessary. Also, this API is necessary if you
> need to get the actual matchable size.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 8:36 PM Medvedkin, Vladimir <
> vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Abdullah,
> > >
> > > Could you please tell more about use cases where this API may be
> useful?
> > >
> > > >a new API to get the hidden key count in the hash table if the rcu
> qsbr is enabled
> > >
> > > Here in commit message and down below in doxygen comments, I think
> this
> > > statement should be more specific because rcu can be created with
> > > RTE_HASH_QSBR_MODE_SYNC mode i.e. without defer queue.
> > >
> > > Also, new API must be reflected in release notes
> > >
> > > On 07/02/2024 15:33, Abdullah Ömer Yamaç wrote:
> > > > This patch introduce a new API to get the hidden key count in the
> hash
> > > > table if the rcu qsbr is enabled. When using rte_hash_count with rcu
> > > > qsbr enabled, it will return the number of elements that are not in
> the
> > > > free queue. Unless rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_reclaim is called, the number of
> > > > elements in the defer queue will not be counted and freed. Therefore
> I
> > > > added a new API to get the number of hidden (defer queue) elements
> > > > in the hash table. Then the user can calculate the total number of
> > > > elements that are available in the hash table.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Abdullah Ömer Yamaç <aomeryamac@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> > > > Cc: Yipeng Wang <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Sameh Gobriel <sameh.gobriel@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >   lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c |  9 +++++++++
> > > >   lib/hash/rte_hash.h        | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > >   lib/hash/version.map       |  1 +
> > > >   lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c     |  8 ++++++++
> > > >   lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h     | 11 +++++++++++
> > > >   lib/rcu/version.map        |  1 +
> > > >   6 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> > > > index 70456754c4..3553f3efc7 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> > > > +++ b/lib/hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> > > > @@ -555,6 +555,15 @@ rte_hash_max_key_id(const struct rte_hash *h)
> > > >               return h->entries;
> > > >   }
> > > >
> > > > +int32_t
> > > > +rte_hash_dq_count(const struct rte_hash *h)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     if (h->dq == NULL)
> > > input arguments must be checked since this is a public API, the same
> is
> > > true for rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_count()
> > > > +             return -EINVAL;
> > > why not just return 0?
> > > > +
> > > > +     return rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_count(h->dq);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >   int32_t
> > > >   rte_hash_count(const struct rte_hash *h)
> > > >   {
> > > > diff --git a/lib/hash/rte_hash.h b/lib/hash/rte_hash.h
> > > > index 7ecc021111..8ea97e297d 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/hash/rte_hash.h
> > > > +++ b/lib/hash/rte_hash.h
> > > > @@ -193,6 +193,19 @@ rte_hash_free(struct rte_hash *h);
> > > >   void
> > > >   rte_hash_reset(struct rte_hash *h);
> > > >
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * Return the number of records in the defer queue of the hash table
> > > > + * if RCU is enabled.
> > > > + * @param h
> > > > + *  Hash table to query from
> > > > + * @return
> > > > + *   - -EINVAL if parameters are invalid
> > > > + *   - A value indicating how many records were inserted in the
> table.
> > > did you mean how many records are kept in defer queue?
> > > > + */
> > > > +int32_t
> > > > +rte_hash_dq_count(const struct rte_hash *h);
> > > > +
> > > >   /**
> > > >    * Return the number of keys in the hash table
> > > >    * @param h
> > > > diff --git a/lib/hash/version.map b/lib/hash/version.map
> > > > index 6b2afebf6b..7f7b158cf1 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/hash/version.map
> > > > +++ b/lib/hash/version.map
> > > > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ DPDK_24 {
> > > >       rte_hash_add_key_with_hash;
> > > >       rte_hash_add_key_with_hash_data;
> > > >       rte_hash_count;
> > > > +     rte_hash_dq_count;
> > > new API must introduced as an experimental API. The same is true for
> > > rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_count()
> > > >       rte_hash_crc32_alg;
> > > >       rte_hash_crc_set_alg;
> > > >       rte_hash_create;
> > > > diff --git a/lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c b/lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c
> > > > index bd0b83be0c..89f8da4c4c 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c
> > > > +++ b/lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.c
> > > > @@ -450,6 +450,14 @@ rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_reclaim(struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq
> *dq, unsigned int n,
> > > >       return 0;
> > > >   }
> > > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * Return the number of entries in a defer queue.
> > > > + */
> > > > +unsigned int rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_count(struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq *dq)
> > > > +{
> > Please validate dq here.
> >
> > > > +     return rte_ring_count(dq->r);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >   /* Delete a defer queue. */
> > > >   int
> > > >   rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_delete(struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq *dq)
> > > > diff --git a/lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h b/lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h
> > > > index 23c9f89805..ed5a590edd 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h
> > > > +++ b/lib/rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h
> > > > @@ -794,6 +794,17 @@ int
> > > >   rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_reclaim(struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq *dq, unsigned int n,
> > > >       unsigned int *freed, unsigned int *pending, unsigned int
> *available);
> > > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * Return the number of entries in a defer queue.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * @param dq
> > > > + *   Defer queue.
> > > > + * @return
> > > > + *   The number of entries in the defer queue.
> > > > + */
> > > > +unsigned int
> > > > +rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_count(struct rte_rcu_qsbr_dq *dq);
> > Agree on the need for this API in RCU
> >
> > > > +
> > > >   /**
> > > >    * Delete a defer queue.
> > > >    *
> > > > diff --git a/lib/rcu/version.map b/lib/rcu/version.map
> > > > index 982ffd59d9..f410ab41e7 100644
> > > > --- a/lib/rcu/version.map
> > > > +++ b/lib/rcu/version.map
> > > > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ DPDK_24 {
> > > >       rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_create;
> > > >       rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_delete;
> > > >       rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_enqueue;
> > > > +     rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_count;
> > > >       rte_rcu_qsbr_dq_reclaim;
> > > >       rte_rcu_qsbr_dump;
> > > >       rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize;
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Vladimir
> > >
> >
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12843 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-07 15:33 Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-02-16 12:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-02-19 17:36 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2024-02-19 21:28   ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-02-19 23:35     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-02-20 18:58       ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-02-21  3:23         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-02-21 21:51           ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç [this message]
2024-02-22  2:37             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-02-22 12:39               ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-02-22 16:44                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-02-28 11:44                   ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-02-28 14:51                     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-03-02 20:22                       ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-03-02 21:08                         ` [PATCH v2] lib/hash: feature reclaim defer queue Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-03-02 21:27                           ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-03-03 19:14                             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-03-04  8:27                               ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-03-04 21:58                                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-03-06  8:55                                   ` [PATCH v3] lib/hash: add defer queue reclaim API Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-03-06  8:59                                   ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-03-06 10:13                                   ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-03-14  7:04                                     ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-04-04 10:11                                       ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-04-05  2:11                                         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-04-15 11:26                                         ` [PATCH v4] " Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-04-23 13:49                                           ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-04-23 21:24                                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-04-25 14:03                                             ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-04-27 19:54                                               ` [PATCH v5] " Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-05-10  3:05                                                 ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-05-13  5:24                                                 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-05-13 15:34                                                   ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-05-15 10:49                                                     ` Abdullah Ömer Yamaç
2024-05-15 10:54                                                     ` [PATCH v6] " Abdullah Ömer Yamaç

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+sj1i9iW8E+U7Y+wVJUrZ1cJAgXRTRP363rD4_i_COwV0J+tQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=aomeryamac@gmail.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    --cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).