From: Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Rizwan Ansari <ransari@mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/6] virtio: arm/arm64: memory mapped IO support in pmd driver
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:49:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAyOgsY_DS2bwDzh0jC3+cN6P2osO-nzYSJPNkGtyTzFuiYKgg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151209110406.0740cfb9@xeon-e3>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:29:30 +0530
> Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Stephen Hemminger
>> > <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 23:05:19 +0530
>> >> Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > +#ifdef RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUXAPP
>> >> > +/* start address of first pci_iobar slot (user-space virtual-addres) */
>> >> > +void *ioport_map;
>> >> > +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM) || defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
>> >> > +
>> >> > +#include <sys/mman.h>
>> >> > +#define DEV_NAME "/dev/igb_ioport"
>> >> > +
>> >> > +/* Keeping pci_ioport_size = 4k.
>> >> > + * So maximum mmaped pci_iobar supported =
>> >> > + * (ioport_size/pci_dev->mem_resource[0].len)
>> >> > + *
>> >> > + * note: kernel could allow maximum 32 virtio-net-pci interface, that
>> >> > mean
>> >> > + * maximum 32 PCI_IOBAR(s) where each PCI_IOBAR_LEN=0x20, so
>> >> > virtio_map_ioport()
>> >> > + * func by theory gonna support 4k/0x20 ==> 128 PCI_IOBAR(s), more than
>> >> > + * max-virtio-net-pci interface.
>> >> > + */
>> >> > +#define PAGE_SIZE 4096
>> >> > +#define PCI_IOPORT_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
>> >> > +#define PCI_IOPORT_MAX 128 /* 4k / 0x20 */
>> >> > +
>> >> > +int ioport_map_cnt;
>> >> > +#endif /* ARM, ARM64 */
>> >> > +#endif /* RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUXAPP */
>> >>
>> >> These variables should be static.
>> >>
>> >
>> > (Sorry for delayed follow, Was travelling..)
>> > Right,
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Also, it is should be possible to extract the I/O bar stuff in a generic
>> >> way through sysfs
>> >> and not depend on a character device. The long term goal for DPDK
>> >> acceptance is to
>> >> eliminate (or at least reduce to a minumum) any requirement for special
>> >> kernel drivers.
>> >
>> >
>> > I agree. Existing implementation does read pci_iobar for start address and
>> > size, But for non-x86 arch, we need someway to map pci_iobar and thats-why
>> > thought of adding device file for a purpose, as archs like arm lack iopl()
>> > privileged io syscall support, However iopl() too quite native driver design
>> > assumption.
>> >
>> > I have few idea in my mind such that - Right now I am updating ioport_mapped
>> > addr {kernel-virtual-addr-io-memory} to /sys/bus/pci/pci_bus_xxxx/xxx/map
>> > field, instead of mapping their, I'll try to map to uio's pci interface and
>> > then use existing pci_map_resource() api to mmap kernel-virtual-io-address
>> > to user-space-virtual-ioaddr. We'll come back on this.
>> >
>>
>>
>> Spent sometime digging dpdk's uio/pci source code, Intent was to map
>> pci ioport region via uio-way. In order to achieve that I tried to
>> hack the virtio-net-pci pmd driver. Right now in virtio-net-pci case,
>> It creates two sysfs entry for pci bars: resource0 /1.
>>
>> Resource0; is ioport region
>> Resource1; is iomem region.
>>
>> By appending a RTE_PCI_DRV_NEED_MAPPING flag to drv_flag and passing
>> hw->io_base = resource1 type pci.mem_resource[slot].addr; where slot
>> =1. Resource1 is IORESOURCE_MEM type so uio/pci driver able to mmap.
>> That way I could get the valid user-space virtual address. However
>> this hack did not worked for me because at qemu side: virtio-pxe.rom
>> has virtio_headers located at ioport pci region and guest driver
>> writing at iomem region, that's why driver init failed. Note that
>> default driver doesn't use resource1 memory.
>>
>> This made me think that either I had to add dependent code in kernel
>> or something similar proposed in this patch.
>> It is because:
>> - uio driver and dependent user-space pci api's in dpdk mmaps
>> IORESOURCE_MEM types address only {refer igbuio_setup_bars() and in
>> particular function pci_parse_sysfs_resource()}.
>> - That mmap in userspace backed by arch specific api
>> pci_mmap_page_range() in kernel.
>> - pci_mmap_page_range() does not support mmaping to IO_RESOURCE_IO type memory.
>> - Having said that, we need routine or a way to to map pci_iobar
>> region from kernel virtual-address to user-space virtual address.
>
> There a couple of gotcha's with this. It turns out the iomem region
> is not mappable on some platforms. I think GCE was one of them.
afaik, In linux kernel if arch supports pci_mmap_page_range then iomem
region should map, right? I am confused by reading your reply, also I
am not aware of GCE? which platform is GCE, please suggest.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-09 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-04 17:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] Add virtio support in arm/arm64 Santosh Shukla
2015-12-04 17:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] virtio: Introduce config RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR Santosh Shukla
2015-12-04 17:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] config: i686: set RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR=n Santosh Shukla
2015-12-04 17:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/6] virtio: armv7/v8: Introdice api to emulate x86-style of PCI/ISA ioport access Santosh Shukla
2015-12-07 17:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-12-08 15:35 ` Santosh Shukla
2015-12-04 17:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/6] config: armv7/v8: Enable RTE_LIBRTE_VIRTIO_PMD Santosh Shukla
2015-12-04 17:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] linuxapp: eal: arm: Always return 0 for rte_eal_iopl_init() Santosh Shukla
2015-12-09 19:58 ` Jan Viktorin
2015-12-04 17:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/6] virtio: arm/arm64: memory mapped IO support in pmd driver Santosh Shukla
2015-12-07 17:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-12-08 12:53 ` Santosh Shukla
2015-12-09 18:59 ` Santosh Shukla
2015-12-09 19:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-12-09 19:19 ` Santosh Shukla [this message]
2015-12-09 19:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-12-08 9:47 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-12-08 12:55 ` Santosh Shukla
2015-12-07 2:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/6] Add virtio support in arm/arm64 Yuanhan Liu
2015-12-08 12:59 ` Xie, Huawei
2015-12-10 6:16 ` Santosh Shukla
2015-12-10 6:31 ` Yuanhan Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAyOgsY_DS2bwDzh0jC3+cN6P2osO-nzYSJPNkGtyTzFuiYKgg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sshukla@mvista.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ransari@mvista.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).