patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 28/31] net/bnxt: fix set MTU
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:13:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACZ4nhspCVFrm-vnmC_=YkWPZZwd=Pk-mCxqne4m1QxpoB4hiw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f973aac-48f7-5da0-34bf-8ffbed614025@intel.com>

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
wrote:

> On 6/19/2018 10:30 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
> > There is no need to update hardware configuration if new MTU is
> > not greater than the max data the mbuf can accommodate.
>
> If app sets a smaller MTU won't it expect that HW will drop received
> packets
> bigger than provided size? Will this logic work if HW is not updated?
>
​Actually, the commit message needs rephrased.
The behavior you mentioned will not be impacted.
​The hardware will honor the MTU configured.​

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-28 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20180619213058.12273-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
2018-06-19 21:30 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 01/31] net/bnxt: fix clear port stats Ajit Khaparde
2018-06-19 21:30 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 05/31] net/bnxt: fix dev close operation Ajit Khaparde
2018-06-26 15:28   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-06-28 20:16     ` Ajit Khaparde
2018-06-19 21:30 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 07/31] net/bnxt: fix HW Tx checksum offload check Ajit Khaparde
2018-06-19 21:30 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 25/31] net/bnxt: fix Tx with multiple mbuf Ajit Khaparde
2018-06-19 21:30 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 28/31] net/bnxt: fix set MTU Ajit Khaparde
2018-06-26 15:30   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-06-28 20:13     ` Ajit Khaparde [this message]
2018-06-19 21:30 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 29/31] net/bnxt: fix incorrect IO address handling in Tx Ajit Khaparde
2018-06-19 21:30 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 31/31] net/bnxt: fix to move a flow to a different queue Ajit Khaparde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACZ4nhspCVFrm-vnmC_=YkWPZZwd=Pk-mCxqne4m1QxpoB4hiw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).