DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kcp: add kernel control path kernel module
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 07:31:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAG8AbRX16-B_4QRpsi6DL6+akPKb9-FL6OCcoFvOX2HD-KQr1Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4528438.gG6caYbQZH@xps13>

Le 10 mars 2016 01:06, "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> a
écrit :
>
> 2016-03-02 23:35, Thomas Monjalon:
> > 2016-03-02 12:21, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > 2016-03-02 11:47, Vincent JARDIN:
> > > > Le 02/03/2016 09:27, Panu Matilainen a écrit :
> > > > >>> I'd like to see these be merged.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Jay
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The code is really not ready. I am okay with cooperative
development
> > > > >> but the current code needs to go into a staging type tree.
> > > > >> No compatibility, no ABI guarantees, more of an RFC.
> > > > >> Don't want vendors building products with it then screaming when
it
> > > > >> gets rebuilt/reworked/scrapped.
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > Exactly.
> > > >
> > > > +1 too
> > > >
> > > > We need to build on this innovation while there is a path for kernel
> > > > mainstream. The logic of using a staging is a good one.
> > > >
> > > > Thomas,
> > > >
> > > > can we open a staging folder into the DPDK like it is done into the
kernel?
> > >
> > > It's possible to create a staging directory if everybody agree.
> > > It is important to state in a README file or in the doc/ that
> > > there will be no guarantee (no stable ABI, no validation and can be
dropped)
> > > and that it is a work in progress, a suggestion to discuss with the
kernel
> > > community.
> > >
> > > The kernel modules must clearly target an upstream integration.
> >
> > Actually the examples directory has been used as a staging for ethtool
and
> > lthread. We also have the crypto API which is still experimental.
> > So I think we must decide among these 3 solutions:
> >       - no special directory, just mark and document an experimental
state
> >       - put only kcp/kdp in the staging directory

I do prefer this option.

> >       - put kcp/kdp in staging and move other experimental libs here
>
> Any opinion? Are we targetting upstream work without any DPDK staging?
>
> Please let's make clear the status of these patches.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-10  6:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1453911849-16562-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
2016-01-27 16:24 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-28  9:49   ` Remy Horton
2016-01-28 13:50     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-28 15:34   ` Avi Kivity
2016-02-28 20:16     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29  9:43       ` Avi Kivity
2016-02-29 10:43         ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29 10:58           ` Avi Kivity
2016-02-29 11:06             ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-29 11:35               ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29 15:05                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29 15:19                 ` Panu Matilainen
2016-02-29 15:27                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-29 16:04                     ` Panu Matilainen
2016-02-29 14:33               ` Jay Rolette
2016-03-01 22:40                 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-02  2:02                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-02  8:27                   ` Panu Matilainen
2016-03-02 10:47                     ` Vincent JARDIN
2016-03-02 10:51                       ` Jim Thompson
2016-03-02 12:03                         ` Vincent JARDIN
2016-03-02 22:51                           ` Jim Thompson
2016-03-02 11:21                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-02 22:35                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-03  8:31                           ` Panu Matilainen
2016-03-03 10:05                             ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-03 10:11                               ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-03 10:51                               ` Panu Matilainen
2016-03-10  0:04                           ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-10  6:31                             ` Vincent JARDIN [this message]
2016-03-02 22:18                   ` Jay Rolette
2016-03-03 10:11                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-03 16:59                       ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-03 18:18                         ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29 11:27             ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29 11:39               ` Avi Kivity
2016-02-29 14:35                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29 20:11   ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-01  0:35     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-27 16:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] rte_ctrl_if: add control interface library Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-28 11:14   ` Remy Horton
2016-01-28 13:15     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-28 13:24       ` Jay Rolette
2016-01-28 13:56         ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-28 13:57       ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-01-28 14:22         ` Yigit, Ferruh
2016-01-27 16:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] examples/ethtool: add control interface support to the application Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-12 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] Use common Linux tools to control DPDK ports Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-12 13:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] kcp: add kernel control path kernel module Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-12 13:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] rte_ctrl_if: add control interface library Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-17 19:58     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-18 10:43       ` Yigit, Ferruh
2016-02-12 13:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] examples/ethtool: add control interface support to the application Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-17 19:39     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-18 10:11       ` Yigit, Ferruh
2016-02-26 14:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Use common Linux tools to control DPDK ports Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-26 14:10     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] lib/librte_ethtool: move librte_ethtool form examples to lib folder Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-26 14:10     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] kcp: add kernel control path kernel module Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-01  1:02       ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-01 15:53         ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-26 14:10     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] rte_ctrl_if: add control interface library Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-26 14:10     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] examples/ethtool: add control interface support to the application Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-29  9:33     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Use common Linux tools to control DPDK ports Remy Horton
2016-03-01 15:41     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-01 15:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] lib/librte_ethtool: move librte_ethtool form examples to lib folder Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-01 15:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] kcp: add kernel control path kernel module Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-01 23:06         ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-02 11:05           ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-01 23:09         ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-01 23:10         ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-02 11:06           ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-01 15:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] rte_ctrl_if: add control interface library Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-01 15:42       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] examples/ethtool: add control interface support to the application Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 11:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Use common Linux tools to control DPDK ports Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 11:41         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/4] lib/librte_ethtool: move librte_ethtool form examples to lib folder Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 11:41         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] kcp: add kernel control path kernel module Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 11:41         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/4] rte_ctrl_if: add control interface library Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 11:41         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/4] examples/ethtool: add control interface support to the application Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-09 12:23           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-03-14 15:31         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] Use common Linux tools to control DPDK ports Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-14 17:40           ` Jay Rolette
2016-03-15  0:00             ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAG8AbRX16-B_4QRpsi6DL6+akPKb9-FL6OCcoFvOX2HD-KQr1Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=vincent.jardin@6wind.com \
    --cc=avi@scylladb.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).