From: Dan Gora <dg@adax.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Igor Ryzhov <iryzhov@nfware.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 10/10] kni: add API to set link status on kernel interface
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 19:11:34 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGyogRYOXDPS=nUh-eNBUDoc4MWV+B6YA3KpbabnV_aaSpvU-w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180830150911.6b0e7901@xeon-e3>
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 7:09 PM, Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 18:41:14 -0300
> Dan Gora <dg@adax.com> wrote:
>
>> On the other hand, the "write to /sys" method is a bit more simple and
>> confines the changes to the user space library. If we're confident
>> that the /sys ABI is stable and not going to be changed going forward
>> it seems like a valid alternative.
>
> See Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-net
yeah, but it's in the 'testing' directory :)
>From Documentation/ABI/README:
testing/
This directory documents interfaces that are felt to be stable,
as the main development of this interface has been completed.
The interface can be changed to add new features, but the
current interface will not break by doing this, unless grave
errors or security problems are found in them. Userspace
programs can start to rely on these interfaces, but they must be
aware of changes that can occur before these interfaces move to
be marked stable. Programs that use these interfaces are
strongly encouraged to add their name to the description of
these interfaces, so that the kernel developers can easily
notify them if any changes occur (see the description of the
layout of the files below for details on how to do this.)
Like I said, I'm ok with using this if that's what everyone wants to do.
d
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-30 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-28 22:45 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] kni: Interface detach and link status fixes Dan Gora
2018-06-29 1:54 ` Dan Gora
2018-06-29 1:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/10] kni: remove unused variables from struct kni_dev Dan Gora
2018-08-29 10:29 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-06-29 1:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 02/10] kni: separate releasing netdev from freeing KNI interface Dan Gora
2018-08-29 10:59 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-09-04 0:20 ` Dan Gora
2018-09-04 0:36 ` Dan Gora
2018-10-10 17:24 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-10 18:18 ` Dan Gora
2018-10-10 22:51 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-10 23:38 ` Dan Gora
2018-06-29 1:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 03/10] kni: don't touch struct kni_dev after freeing Dan Gora
2018-06-29 1:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 04/10] kni: add rte_kni_free to KNI library Dan Gora
2018-06-29 1:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 05/10] kni: don't run rte_kni_handle_request after interface release Dan Gora
2018-06-29 1:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 06/10] kni: increase length of timeout for KNI responses Dan Gora
2018-06-29 1:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/10] kni: update kni test for rte_kni_free Dan Gora
2018-06-29 1:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 08/10] kni: add rte_kni_free to KNI example app Dan Gora
2018-06-29 1:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 09/10] kni: add rte_kni_free to KNI vdev driver Dan Gora
2018-06-29 1:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 10/10] kni: add API to set link status on kernel interface Dan Gora
2018-08-29 11:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-08-29 21:10 ` Dan Gora
2018-08-29 22:01 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-29 15:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-29 21:02 ` Dan Gora
2018-08-29 22:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-29 22:12 ` Dan Gora
2018-08-29 22:41 ` Dan Gora
2018-08-29 23:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-30 9:49 ` Igor Ryzhov
2018-08-30 10:32 ` Igor Ryzhov
2018-08-30 21:41 ` Dan Gora
2018-08-30 22:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-08-30 22:11 ` Dan Gora [this message]
2018-09-04 0:47 ` Dan Gora
2018-09-05 12:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-09-11 21:45 ` Dan Gora
2018-09-11 21:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-09-11 22:07 ` Dan Gora
2018-09-11 23:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-09-12 4:02 ` Jason Wang
2018-09-11 23:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] " Dan Gora
2018-09-11 23:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] " Dan Gora
2018-09-11 23:18 ` Dan Gora
2018-07-20 11:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] kni: Interface detach and link status fixes Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGyogRYOXDPS=nUh-eNBUDoc4MWV+B6YA3KpbabnV_aaSpvU-w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dg@adax.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=iryzhov@nfware.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).