From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>,
Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
Tomasz Kantecki <tomasz.kantecki@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/l3fwd: increase number of routes
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 09:51:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wSX1QTUBvJW+CCO5Cf_AyfXFjy-y04T=vFNqrTxEGbww@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191030052318.1167-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 6:23 AM <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> wrote:
>
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>
> Increase the number of routes from 8 to 16 that are statically added for
> lpm and em mode as most of the SoCs support more than 8 interfaces.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
> ---
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 16 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> index 74a7c8fa4..c07a5b937 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,18 @@ static struct ipv4_l3fwd_em_route ipv4_l3fwd_em_route_array[] = {
> {{RTE_IPV4(201, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 20, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 1},
> {{RTE_IPV4(111, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 2},
> {{RTE_IPV4(211, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 3},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(121, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 10, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 4},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(221, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 20, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 5},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(131, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 6},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(231, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 7},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(141, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 8},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(241, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 9},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(151, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 10},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(251, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 11},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(161, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 12},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(261, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 13},
Am I reading this correctly ? 261.0.0.0 ?
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-08 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-30 5:23 pbhagavatula
2019-10-30 5:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] examples/l3fwd: print port bdf when initializing routes pbhagavatula
2019-11-08 8:51 ` David Marchand [this message]
2020-08-02 18:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] examples/l3fwd: increase number of routes pbhagavatula
2020-08-02 18:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/l3fwd: use IP reserved addresses for EM mode pbhagavatula
2020-10-23 14:11 ` David Marchand
2020-08-02 18:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] examples/l3fwd: print port bdf when initializing routes pbhagavatula
2021-10-03 20:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] examples/l3fwd: increase number of routes pbhagavatula
2021-10-03 20:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] examples/l3fwd: print port bdf when adding routes pbhagavatula
2021-11-04 10:28 ` Walsh, Conor
2021-11-05 7:27 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2021-10-03 20:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] examples/l3fwd: use reserved addresses for EM mode pbhagavatula
2021-10-03 20:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] examples/l3fwd: increase number of routes pbhagavatula
2021-10-03 20:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] examples/l3fwd: print port bdf when adding routes pbhagavatula
2021-10-03 20:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] examples/l3fwd: use reserved addresses for EM mode pbhagavatula
2021-11-03 20:53 ` David Marchand
2021-11-05 7:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2021-11-04 10:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] examples/l3fwd: increase number of routes Walsh, Conor
2021-11-05 7:27 ` Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2021-11-05 8:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " pbhagavatula
2021-11-05 8:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] examples/l3fwd: print port bdf when adding routes pbhagavatula
2021-11-05 9:34 ` Walsh, Conor
2021-11-05 8:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] examples/l3fwd: use reserved addresses for EM mode pbhagavatula
2021-11-16 10:03 ` David Marchand
2021-11-05 9:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] examples/l3fwd: increase number of routes Walsh, Conor
2021-10-04 15:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Stephen Hemminger
2019-11-11 7:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] " Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2020-07-30 21:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJFAV8wSX1QTUBvJW+CCO5Cf_AyfXFjy-y04T=vFNqrTxEGbww@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
--cc=orika@mellanox.com \
--cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
--cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
--cc=tomasz.kantecki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).