patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, nd <nd@arm.com>,
	 dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/rcu: increase the size of num cores variable
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 11:09:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8xPFkG25tS7dKXAU_1FZhG8Y8Xuic0fQkCDdaGZ2YSBag@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190628034406.5399-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 5:44 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli <
honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:

> num_cores is of type uint8_t. This results in the following
> compilation error.
>
> test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c:649:16: error: comparison is always false
> due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits]
>   if (num_cores >= RTE_MAX_LCORE) {
>                 ^~
>
> RTE_MAX_LCORE is set to 256 for armv8 config.
>


Weird I did not see this error in travis.
Just tried again:
https://travis-ci.com/david-marchand/dpdk/jobs/211768426



> Fixes: e6a14121f4ae ("test/rcu: remove arbitrary limit on max core count")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> ---
>  app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c      | 4 ++--
>  app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
> index 943a1e370..0c6267ee9 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>  #define TEST_RCU_QSBR_CNT_INIT 1
>
>  uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
> -uint8_t num_cores;
> +uint16_t num_cores;
>

If we want to be closer to the eal API, those should be unsigned int.



>  static uint32_t *keys;
>  #define TOTAL_ENTRY (1024 * 8)
> @@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ static int
>  test_rcu_qsbr_mw_mv_mqs(void)
>  {
>         int i, j;
> -       uint8_t test_cores;
> +       uint16_t test_cores;
>
>         writer_done = 0;
>         test_cores = num_cores / 4;
> diff --git a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
> index 363365f46..b1a910423 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>
>  /* Check condition and return an error if true. */
>  static uint16_t enabled_core_ids[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
> -static uint8_t num_cores;
> +static uint16_t num_cores;
>
>  static uint32_t *keys;
>  #define TOTAL_ENTRY (1024 * 8)
> --
> 2.17.1
>


-- 
David Marchand

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-28  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-28  3:44 [dpdk-stable] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28  3:44 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/2] test/rcu: address test case failure Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28  9:16   ` David Marchand
2019-06-28 13:53     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 14:09       ` David Marchand
2019-06-28 16:36         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 16:54           ` David Marchand
2019-06-28  9:09 ` David Marchand [this message]
2019-06-28 13:34   ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/rcu: increase the size of num cores variable Thomas Monjalon
2019-06-28 16:38     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 16:35 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 16:35   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/rcu: address test case failure Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 17:11   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/rcu: increase the size of num cores variable David Marchand
2019-06-28 18:43 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 18:43   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/rcu: address test case failure Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 18:54   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/2] test/rcu: increase the size of num cores variable David Marchand
2019-06-29 12:25     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8xPFkG25tS7dKXAU_1FZhG8Y8Xuic0fQkCDdaGZ2YSBag@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).