DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>
Cc: jiayu.hu@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gro : fix pkt length when extra bytes are padded to ethernet frame
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 21:32:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8yLbAkVgo8sBWjcrXEiYAC3Hkyq99UkGhccQX7OPPyYcA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221010175109.44282-1-kumaraparmesh92@gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 7:51 PM Kumara Parameshwaran
<kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>
>
> When GRO packets are merged the packet length is used while
> merging the adjacent packets. If the padded bytes are accounted
> we would end up acking unsent TCP segments.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumara Parameshwaran <kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com>
> v1:
>         If there is padding to the ethernet frame cases where timestamp is disabled
>         the packet length should be validated with the total ip length as packet length
>         is used in the GRO merging logic

Please, can you test with current main branch?
We recently merged a fix:
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=b8a55871d5af6f5b8694b1cb5eacbc629734e403


-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-10 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-10 17:51 Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-10-10 19:32 ` David Marchand [this message]
     [not found]   ` <CANxNyasJ7RWk6S9hArfKc=m39huCOgab92sV4DjxDh0VENLf7Q@mail.gmail.com>
2022-10-11  5:47     ` Fwd: " kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2022-10-12  1:34       ` Jun Qiu
2022-10-12  7:48         ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2022-10-12  7:50           ` David Marchand
2022-10-16  7:01         ` Hu, Jiayu
2022-10-17 13:27           ` kumaraparameshwaran rathinavel
2023-10-31 18:49             ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-10-16 14:43 ` [PATCH v2] gro : check for payload length after the trim Kumara Parameshwaran
2022-10-18  8:21   ` Hu, Jiayu
2022-10-26 15:23     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8yLbAkVgo8sBWjcrXEiYAC3Hkyq99UkGhccQX7OPPyYcA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jiayu.hu@intel.com \
    --cc=kumaraparamesh92@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).