DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"Tyler Retzlaff" <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, techboard@dpdk.org,
	"Honnappa Nagarahalli" <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	"Ruifeng Wang" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
	"Jerin Jacob" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"Sunil Kumar Kori" <skori@marvell.com>,
	"Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>,
	"Joyce Kong" <joyce.kong@arm.com>,
	"David Christensen" <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Konstantin Ananyev" <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
	"David Hunt" <david.hunt@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] eal: provide rte stdatomics optional atomics API
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 11:34:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zHccpbd06HQfPvaOMh9wPRU2FZqtrqBOCUtpESeXL7ew@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZRaYM1YTP8smnGib@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:26 AM Bruce Richardson
<bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:02:38AM +0200, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:54 AM Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
> > > In my opinion, our move to C11 thus makes RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON obsolete.
> >
> > That's my thought too.
> >
> > >
> > > We should mark RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON as deprecated, and disallow RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON in new code. Perhaps checkpatches could catch this?
> >
> > For a clear deprecation of a part of DPDK API, I don't see a need to
> > add something in checkpatch.
> > Putting a RTE_DEPRECATED in RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON directly triggers a build
> > warning (caught by CI since we run with Werror).
> >
>
> Would it not be sufficient to just make it an alias for the C11 static
> assertions? It's not like its a lot of code to maintain, and if app users
> have it in their code I'm not sure we get massive benefit from forcing them
> to edit their code. I'd rather see it kept as a one-line macro purely from
> a backward compatibility viewpoint. We can replace internal usages, though
> - which can be checked by checkpatch.

No, there is no massive benefit, just trying to reduce our ever
growing API surface.

Note, this macro should have been kept internal but it was introduced
at a time such matter was not considered...


-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-29  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-11  1:31 [PATCH 0/6] RFC optional rte optional stdatomics API Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-11  1:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] eal: provide rte stdatomics optional atomics API Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-11  8:56   ` Bruce Richardson
2023-08-11  9:42   ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-11 15:54     ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-14  9:04       ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-11  1:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] eal: adapt EAL to present rte " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-11  1:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] eal: add rte atomic qualifier with casts Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-11  1:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] distributor: adapt for EAL optional atomics API changes Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-11  1:32 ` [PATCH 5/6] bpf: " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-11  1:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] devtools: forbid new direct use of GCC atomic builtins Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-11  8:57   ` Bruce Richardson
2023-08-11  9:51   ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-11 15:56     ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-14  6:37       ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-11 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] RFC optional rte optional stdatomics API Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-11 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 1/6] eal: provide rte stdatomics optional atomics API Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-14  7:06     ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-11 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 2/6] eal: adapt EAL to present rte " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-14  8:00     ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-14 17:47       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 20:13         ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-16 20:32           ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-11 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 3/6] eal: add rte atomic qualifier with casts Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-14  8:05     ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-11 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 4/6] distributor: adapt for EAL optional atomics API changes Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-14  8:07     ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-11 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 5/6] bpf: " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-14  8:11     ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-11 17:32   ` [PATCH v2 6/6] devtools: forbid new direct use of GCC atomic builtins Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-14  8:12     ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-16 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] RFC optional rte optional stdatomics API Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 19:19   ` [PATCH v3 1/6] eal: provide rte stdatomics optional atomics API Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 20:55     ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-16 21:04       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 21:08         ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-16 21:10         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 19:19   ` [PATCH v3 2/6] eal: adapt EAL to present rte " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 19:19   ` [PATCH v3 3/6] eal: add rte atomic qualifier with casts Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 19:19   ` [PATCH v3 4/6] distributor: adapt for EAL optional atomics API changes Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 19:19   ` [PATCH v3 5/6] bpf: " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 19:19   ` [PATCH v3 6/6] devtools: forbid new direct use of GCC atomic builtins Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 21:38 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] RFC optional rte optional stdatomics API Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 1/6] eal: provide rte stdatomics optional atomics API Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-17 11:45     ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-17 19:09       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-18  6:55         ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-16 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 2/6] eal: adapt EAL to present rte " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 3/6] eal: add rte atomic qualifier with casts Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 4/6] distributor: adapt for EAL optional atomics API changes Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 5/6] bpf: " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-16 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 6/6] devtools: forbid new direct use of GCC atomic builtins Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-17 11:57     ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-17 19:14       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-18  7:13         ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-22 18:14           ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-17 21:42 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] optional rte optional stdatomics API Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-17 21:42   ` [PATCH v5 1/6] eal: provide rte stdatomics optional atomics API Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-17 21:42   ` [PATCH v5 2/6] eal: adapt EAL to present rte " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-17 21:42   ` [PATCH v5 3/6] eal: add rte atomic qualifier with casts Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-17 21:42   ` [PATCH v5 4/6] distributor: adapt for EAL optional atomics API changes Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-17 21:42   ` [PATCH v5 5/6] bpf: " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-17 21:42   ` [PATCH v5 6/6] devtools: forbid new direct use of GCC atomic builtins Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-21 22:27   ` [PATCH v5 0/6] optional rte optional stdatomics API Konstantin Ananyev
2023-08-22 21:00 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] rte atomics API for optional stdatomic Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-22 21:00   ` [PATCH v6 1/6] eal: provide rte stdatomics optional atomics API Tyler Retzlaff
2023-09-28  8:06     ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-09-29  8:04       ` David Marchand
2023-09-29  8:54         ` Morten Brørup
2023-09-29  9:02           ` David Marchand
2023-09-29  9:26             ` Bruce Richardson
2023-09-29  9:34               ` David Marchand [this message]
2023-09-29 10:26                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-09-29 11:38                   ` David Marchand
2023-09-29 11:51                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-08-22 21:00   ` [PATCH v6 2/6] eal: adapt EAL to present rte " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-22 21:00   ` [PATCH v6 3/6] eal: add rte atomic qualifier with casts Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-22 21:00   ` [PATCH v6 4/6] distributor: adapt for EAL optional atomics API changes Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-22 21:00   ` [PATCH v6 5/6] bpf: " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-22 21:00   ` [PATCH v6 6/6] devtools: forbid new direct use of GCC atomic builtins Tyler Retzlaff
2023-08-29 15:57   ` [PATCH v6 0/6] rte atomics API for optional stdatomic Tyler Retzlaff
2023-09-29 14:09   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8zHccpbd06HQfPvaOMh9wPRU2FZqtrqBOCUtpESeXL7ew@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.hunt@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=joyce.kong@arm.com \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=skori@marvell.com \
    --cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).