patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	 "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/2] test/rcu: address test case failure
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:09:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zkZpK5baJC1YPM7MK2exptYmBCi3g6Y39mu_55r97aWA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR08MB5149AAB2C9129B91B7FC583698FC0@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 3:54 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli <
Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 5:44 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli <
> honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Test case for rte_rcu_qsbr_get_memsize is written specifically
> for 128 threads. Do not use RTE_MAX_LCORE as it changes for
> different configurations.
>
>
>
> Does it mean this test can only work on arm with 256 lcores?
>
> How many cores does this test require?
>
> *[Honnappa] *It tests the correctness of the calculation of the memory
> required. So, it uses the hand calculated number to verify. The hand
> calculated number is for 128 cores. So, it does not depend on the platform
> as such.
>

Ah ah, funny that the default RTE_MAX_LCORE for x86 is 128, and then I did
not see the test failing.
Then ok for this fix.

Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>


How about the followup patch:

-       TEST_RCU_QSBR_RETURN_IF_ERROR((sz != 8384 && sz != 16768),
-               "Get Memsize for 128 threads");
+       TEST_RCU_QSBR_RETURN_IF_ERROR(
+#if RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE == 64
+                       sz != 8384
+#elif RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE == 128
+                       sz != 16768
+#endif
+               , "Get Memsize for 128 threads");


-- 
David Marchand

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-28 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-28  3:44 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] test/rcu: increase the size of num cores variable Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28  3:44 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/2] test/rcu: address test case failure Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28  9:16   ` David Marchand
2019-06-28 13:53     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 14:09       ` David Marchand [this message]
2019-06-28 16:36         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 16:54           ` David Marchand
2019-06-28  9:09 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/rcu: increase the size of num cores variable David Marchand
2019-06-28 13:34   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-06-28 16:38     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 16:35 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 16:35   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/rcu: address test case failure Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 17:11   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/2] test/rcu: increase the size of num cores variable David Marchand
2019-06-28 18:43 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 18:43   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/rcu: address test case failure Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-06-28 18:54   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/2] test/rcu: increase the size of num cores variable David Marchand
2019-06-29 12:25     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8zkZpK5baJC1YPM7MK2exptYmBCi3g6Y39mu_55r97aWA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).