From: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
Cc: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>,
Shani Peretz <shperetz@nvidia.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Maayan Kashani <mkashani@nvidia.com>, Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
Aman Singh <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
Yuying Zhang <yuying.zhang@intel.com>,
"ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix auto completion for indirect list action
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 16:25:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJvnSUAO=ME0iUkR0BdQhjU6YioSySaKykitohWOujrC_NC=1A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46653254-c995-4de0-82fa-2531ed4cfaa0@amd.com>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 6:08 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/20/2024 6:06 AM, Gregory Etelson wrote:
> > Hello Ferruh,
> >
> >>BUT overall how can we catch issues like this in the feature, we don't
> >>have a good way to test testpmd flow commands.
> >>@Ori, @Gregory, do you have any idea?
> >>cc'ed CI mail list too.
> >
> > We have a tool for unit tests based on the testpmd.
> > The tool details are here:
> > https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1cHrPwx4fUJ6ibUCtHd4kNKsrmmvQvvOj?usp=drive_link <https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1cHrPwx4fUJ6ibUCtHd4kNKsrmmvQvvOj?usp=drive_link>.
> > There's also a short description here:
> > https://inbox.dpdk.org/ci/2a287ee7-cda4-f2ab-a4e6-a47021f8573f@nvidia.com/ <https://inbox.dpdk.org/ci/2a287ee7-cda4-f2ab-a4e6-a47021f8573f@nvidia.com/>
> >
> > Consider an option when a code patch is accompanied with a short test
> > script that validates that patch functionality.
> > DPDK CI can run the script to verify that the patch functions correctly.
A similar idea has been proposed for DTS. I believe the plan is at the
end of 2024 techboard is going to discuss adding this as a requirement
for patches affecting certain components in DPDK. So a change related
to the new feature must come with an accompanied /dts testsuite
addition at the same time.
> >
> >
>
> Thanks Gregory, I missed this proposal, we need something to verify flow
> APIs, so +1 to the effort.
> What is the status of incorporating this feature into dts?
The DTS 24.07 roadmap does not include testsuites verifying flow APIs,
but if work proceeds at a good pace and there is space for it, we can
look at writing something for 24.07. Otherwise it falls to 24.11 or
25.03. Sorry, I know that's pretty far out.
>
>
> But I guess it won't catch this issue, as it uses full flow commands.
> This issue is related to the testpmd command parsing code. I wonder if
> we can find a way to verify testpmd parsing code?
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-20 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240318092109.87656-1-shperetz@nvidia.com>
[not found] ` <62669854-8add-4fdd-b882-a63d78f0d6e8@amd.com>
2024-03-19 15:29 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-03-20 6:06 ` Gregory Etelson
2024-03-20 10:08 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-03-20 20:25 ` Patrick Robb [this message]
2024-03-23 10:09 ` Gregory Etelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJvnSUAO=ME0iUkR0BdQhjU6YioSySaKykitohWOujrC_NC=1A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=probb@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=getelson@nvidia.com \
--cc=mkashani@nvidia.com \
--cc=orika@nvidia.com \
--cc=shperetz@nvidia.com \
--cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).