From: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>
To: Paul.Szczepanek@arm.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com, npratte@iol.unh.edu,
dmarx@iol.unh.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] dts: add VF configuration and workflow
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 08:56:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJvnSUC3r7JYHZqa7RjJxvcphVSdtLXwDgsm9Q_AyHiVb_tpng@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250313033611.1896695-3-probb@iol.unh.edu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 942 bytes --]
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 11:40 PM Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>
> + def set_vfs(self):
> + """Create virtual functions for the port."""
> + self.node.main_session.create_vfs(self)
> + addr_list = self.node.main_session.get_pci_addr_of_vfs(self)
> + for addr in addr_list:
> + vf_port_config = PortConfig(
> + name=f"{self.name}-vf-{addr}",
> + pci=addr,
> + os_driver_for_dpdk=self.config.os_driver_for_dpdk,
> + os_driver=self.config.os_driver,
> + )
> + self.virtual_functions.append(Port(self.node, vf_port_config))
>
From doing additional runs from this patch, I am seeing for some reason
like 10% of the time there will be some StopIteration error on a VF port
init from get_port_info(pci), when it is indeed being provided with a pci
address (I think but I can debug).
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1629 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-13 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-21 19:15 [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " jspewock
2024-08-21 19:15 ` [RFC PATCH v1 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " jspewock
2024-08-21 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " jspewock
2024-08-21 19:38 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-08-21 19:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework Jeremy Spewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 " jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " jspewock
2024-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework jspewock
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] dts: allow binding only a single port to a different driver jspewock
2024-09-25 8:45 ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-11-14 16:45 ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] dts: parameterize what ports the TG sends packets to jspewock
2024-09-25 10:58 ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-11-14 17:01 ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] dts: add class for virtual functions jspewock
2024-09-25 11:28 ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-11-14 17:10 ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] dts: add OS abstractions for creating " jspewock
2024-09-25 12:05 ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-11-14 17:29 ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-23 18:42 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] dts: add functions for managing VFs to Node jspewock
2024-09-25 13:29 ` Juraj Linkeš
2024-11-14 17:36 ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-09-25 8:24 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] dts: add VFs to the framework Juraj Linkeš
2025-03-13 3:36 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Patrick Robb
2025-03-13 3:36 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] dts: add OS abstractions for creating virtual functions Patrick Robb
2025-03-13 12:53 ` Patrick Robb
2025-06-11 20:24 ` Patrick Robb
2025-03-13 3:36 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] dts: add VF configuration and workflow Patrick Robb
2025-03-13 12:56 ` Patrick Robb [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJvnSUC3r7JYHZqa7RjJxvcphVSdtLXwDgsm9Q_AyHiVb_tpng@mail.gmail.com \
--to=probb@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com \
--cc=Paul.Szczepanek@arm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmarx@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=npratte@iol.unh.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).