DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>
To: Andrew Bailey <abailey@iol.unh.edu>
Cc: luca.vizzarro@arm.com, dev@dpdk.org, dmarx@iol.unh.edu,
	 ivan.malov@arknetworks.am, Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dts: add TX offload capabilities to NIC capabilities
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 16:51:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJvnSUC51q2nZnZp+SZwoD=e-7qyGPMwvF6OWgXg2mMudLtkxw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250924164725.168773-3-abailey@iol.unh.edu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 966 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 12:47 PM Andrew Bailey <abailey@iol.unh.edu> wrote:

> Currently, there is no support for tracking tx_offload capabilities and
> there is no separation between port capabilities and queue
> capabilities. This is an issue if a test case requires a tx_offload
> capability or if a test case requires that a card supports a capability
> on a queue. This causes test cases with said requirements to not be
> skipped when appropriate. Add tx_offload capabilities and distinguish
> capabilities between ports and queues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bailey <abailey@iol.unh.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Spewock <jspewock@iol.unh.edu>
>
> -        Args:
> -            line: The line to parse.
> +@dataclass
> +class OffloadCapabilities(TextParser):
> +    """The result of testpmd's ``show port <port_id> tx_offload
> capabilities`` command.
>

tx_offload or rx_offload, right?

Reviewed-by: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1569 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-24 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-02 11:43 [PATCH v1 0/3] dts: add tx_offload support in dts Andrew Bailey
2025-09-02 11:43 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] dts: fix docstring typo in checksum suite Andrew Bailey
2025-09-02 11:43 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] dts: add reception check to checksum offload suite Andrew Bailey
2025-09-02 11:43 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] dts: all are one Andrew Bailey
2025-09-02 11:48 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] dts: add tx_offload support in dts Andrew Bailey
2025-09-24 16:47 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] dts:add " Andrew Bailey
2025-09-24 16:47   ` [PATCH v4 1/3] dts: allow mbuf_fast_free to be set with testpmd shell Andrew Bailey
2025-09-24 20:51     ` Patrick Robb
2025-09-25 16:01     ` Luca Vizzarro
2025-09-24 16:47   ` [PATCH v4 2/3] dts: add TX offload capabilities to NIC capabilities Andrew Bailey
2025-09-24 20:51     ` Patrick Robb [this message]
2025-09-25 16:05     ` Luca Vizzarro
2025-09-24 16:47   ` [PATCH v4 3/3] dts: update tx_offload test from old dts Andrew Bailey
2025-09-24 20:53     ` Patrick Robb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJvnSUC51q2nZnZp+SZwoD=e-7qyGPMwvF6OWgXg2mMudLtkxw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=probb@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=abailey@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dmarx@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=ivan.malov@arknetworks.am \
    --cc=jspewock@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=luca.vizzarro@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).