DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: pbhagavatula@marvell.com
Cc: jerinj@marvell.com, Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
	 Kiran Kumar K <kirankumark@marvell.com>,
	Sunil Kumar Kori <skori@marvell.com>,
	 Satha Rao <skoteshwar@marvell.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] common/cnxk: remove unnecessary locks
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 16:34:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1OSRtMsnTwy7902A1zExLExDwDVAwmkdHa=gFn13iWx-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230207202817.818-1-pbhagavatula@marvell.com>

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:58 AM <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> wrote:
>
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>
> Remove unnecessary locks as locking is now taken care by
> mbox_get and mbox_put.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>

Updated the git commit as follows and applied to
dpdk-next-net-mrvl/for-next-net. Thanks

    common/cnxk: remove redundant locks

    Remove redundant locks as locking is now taken care by
    mbox_get() and mbox_put().

    Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
> ---
>  v2 Changes:
>  - Rebase on main
>
>  drivers/common/cnxk/roc_sso.c      | 25 -------------------------
>  drivers/common/cnxk/roc_sso_priv.h |  1 -
>  2 files changed, 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_sso.c b/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_sso.c
> index a422e37be6..9e466f09ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_sso.c
> +++ b/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_sso.c
> @@ -327,7 +327,6 @@ roc_sso_hws_stats_get(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, uint8_t hws,
>         struct mbox *mbox;
>         int rc;
>
> -       plt_spinlock_lock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         mbox = mbox_get(dev->mbox);
>         req_rsp = (struct sso_hws_stats *)mbox_alloc_msg_sso_hws_get_stats(
>                 mbox);
> @@ -354,7 +353,6 @@ roc_sso_hws_stats_get(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, uint8_t hws,
>         stats->arbitration = req_rsp->arbitration;
>  fail:
>         mbox_put(mbox);
> -       plt_spinlock_unlock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         return rc;
>  }
>
> @@ -368,7 +366,6 @@ roc_sso_hwgrp_stats_get(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, uint8_t hwgrp,
>         struct mbox *mbox;
>         int rc;
>
> -       plt_spinlock_lock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         mbox = mbox_get(dev->mbox);
>         req_rsp = (struct sso_grp_stats *)mbox_alloc_msg_sso_grp_get_stats(
>                 mbox);
> @@ -403,7 +400,6 @@ roc_sso_hwgrp_stats_get(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, uint8_t hwgrp,
>
>  fail:
>         mbox_put(mbox);
> -       plt_spinlock_unlock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         return rc;
>  }
>
> @@ -427,7 +423,6 @@ roc_sso_hwgrp_qos_config(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, struct roc_sso_hwgrp_qos *qos,
>         struct mbox *mbox;
>         int i, rc;
>
> -       plt_spinlock_lock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         mbox = mbox_get(dev->mbox);
>         for (i = 0; i < nb_qos; i++) {
>                 uint8_t iaq_prcnt = qos[i].iaq_prcnt;
> @@ -461,7 +456,6 @@ roc_sso_hwgrp_qos_config(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, struct roc_sso_hwgrp_qos *qos,
>                 rc = -EIO;
>  fail:
>         mbox_put(mbox);
> -       plt_spinlock_unlock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         return rc;
>  }
>
> @@ -562,11 +556,9 @@ roc_sso_hwgrp_init_xaq_aura(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, uint32_t nb_xae)
>         struct dev *dev = &sso->dev;
>         int rc;
>
> -       plt_spinlock_lock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         rc = sso_hwgrp_init_xaq_aura(dev, &roc_sso->xaq, nb_xae,
>                                      roc_sso->xae_waes, roc_sso->xaq_buf_size,
>                                      roc_sso->nb_hwgrp);
> -       plt_spinlock_unlock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         return rc;
>  }
>
> @@ -600,9 +592,7 @@ roc_sso_hwgrp_free_xaq_aura(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, uint16_t nb_hwgrp)
>         struct dev *dev = &sso->dev;
>         int rc;
>
> -       plt_spinlock_lock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         rc = sso_hwgrp_free_xaq_aura(dev, &roc_sso->xaq, nb_hwgrp);
> -       plt_spinlock_unlock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         return rc;
>  }
>
> @@ -639,9 +629,7 @@ roc_sso_hwgrp_alloc_xaq(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, uint32_t npa_aura_id,
>         struct dev *dev = &sso->dev;
>         int rc;
>
> -       plt_spinlock_lock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         rc = sso_hwgrp_alloc_xaq(dev, npa_aura_id, hwgrps);
> -       plt_spinlock_unlock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         return rc;
>  }
>
> @@ -677,9 +665,7 @@ roc_sso_hwgrp_release_xaq(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, uint16_t hwgrps)
>         struct dev *dev = &sso->dev;
>         int rc;
>
> -       plt_spinlock_lock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         rc = sso_hwgrp_release_xaq(dev, hwgrps);
> -       plt_spinlock_unlock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         return rc;
>  }
>
> @@ -693,7 +679,6 @@ roc_sso_hwgrp_set_priority(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, uint16_t hwgrp,
>         struct mbox *mbox;
>         int rc = -ENOSPC;
>
> -       plt_spinlock_lock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         mbox = mbox_get(dev->mbox);
>         req = mbox_alloc_msg_sso_grp_set_priority(mbox);
>         if (req == NULL)
> @@ -709,14 +694,12 @@ roc_sso_hwgrp_set_priority(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, uint16_t hwgrp,
>                 goto fail;
>         }
>         mbox_put(mbox);
> -       plt_spinlock_unlock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         plt_sso_dbg("HWGRP %d weight %d affinity %d priority %d", hwgrp, weight,
>                     affinity, priority);
>
>         return 0;
>  fail:
>         mbox_put(mbox);
> -       plt_spinlock_unlock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         return rc;
>  }
>
> @@ -778,7 +761,6 @@ roc_sso_rsrc_init(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, uint8_t nb_hws, uint16_t nb_hwgrp, ui
>         if (!nb_hws || roc_sso->max_hws < nb_hws)
>                 return -ENOENT;
>
> -       plt_spinlock_lock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         rc = sso_rsrc_attach(roc_sso, SSO_LF_TYPE_HWS, nb_hws);
>         if (rc < 0) {
>                 plt_err("Unable to attach SSO HWS LFs");
> @@ -845,7 +827,6 @@ roc_sso_rsrc_init(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, uint8_t nb_hws, uint16_t nb_hwgrp, ui
>                 goto sso_msix_fail;
>         }
>
> -       plt_spinlock_unlock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         roc_sso->nb_hwgrp = nb_hwgrp;
>         roc_sso->nb_hws = nb_hws;
>
> @@ -859,7 +840,6 @@ roc_sso_rsrc_init(struct roc_sso *roc_sso, uint8_t nb_hws, uint16_t nb_hwgrp, ui
>  hwgrp_atch_fail:
>         sso_rsrc_detach(roc_sso, SSO_LF_TYPE_HWS);
>  fail:
> -       plt_spinlock_unlock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         return rc;
>  }
>
> @@ -881,7 +861,6 @@ roc_sso_rsrc_fini(struct roc_sso *roc_sso)
>
>         roc_sso->nb_hwgrp = 0;
>         roc_sso->nb_hws = 0;
> -       plt_spinlock_unlock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>  }
>
>  int
> @@ -900,7 +879,6 @@ roc_sso_dev_init(struct roc_sso *roc_sso)
>         sso = roc_sso_to_sso_priv(roc_sso);
>         memset(sso, 0, sizeof(*sso));
>         pci_dev = roc_sso->pci_dev;
> -       plt_spinlock_init(&sso->mbox_lock);
>
>         rc = sso_update_msix_vec_count(roc_sso, 0);
>         if (rc < 0) {
> @@ -914,7 +892,6 @@ roc_sso_dev_init(struct roc_sso *roc_sso)
>                 goto fail;
>         }
>
> -       plt_spinlock_lock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         rc = sso_rsrc_get(roc_sso);
>         if (rc < 0) {
>                 plt_err("Failed to get SSO resources");
> @@ -956,7 +933,6 @@ roc_sso_dev_init(struct roc_sso *roc_sso)
>         sso->pci_dev = pci_dev;
>         sso->dev.drv_inited = true;
>         roc_sso->lmt_base = sso->dev.lmt_base;
> -       plt_spinlock_unlock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>
>         return 0;
>  link_mem_free:
> @@ -964,7 +940,6 @@ roc_sso_dev_init(struct roc_sso *roc_sso)
>  rsrc_fail:
>         rc |= dev_fini(&sso->dev, pci_dev);
>  fail:
> -       plt_spinlock_unlock(&sso->mbox_lock);
>         return rc;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_sso_priv.h b/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_sso_priv.h
> index 674e4e0a39..09729d4f62 100644
> --- a/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_sso_priv.h
> +++ b/drivers/common/cnxk/roc_sso_priv.h
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ struct sso {
>         /* SSO link mapping. */
>         struct plt_bitmap **link_map;
>         void *link_map_mem;
> -       plt_spinlock_t mbox_lock;
>  } __plt_cache_aligned;
>
>  enum sso_err_status {
> --
> 2.25.1
>

      reply	other threads:[~2023-02-11 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-02  7:55 [PATCH] " pbhagavatula
2023-02-02  9:00 ` David Marchand
2023-02-07 20:28 ` [PATCH v2] " pbhagavatula
2023-02-11 11:04   ` Jerin Jacob [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALBAE1OSRtMsnTwy7902A1zExLExDwDVAwmkdHa=gFn13iWx-Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kirankumark@marvell.com \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
    --cc=skori@marvell.com \
    --cc=skoteshwar@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).