From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"ferruh.yigit@amd.com" <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] mempool: remove internal tracepoints from version map
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 21:02:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1PFjqnyqvrkTQGcbC7nQKQZTut4E9ttSYrqNpjeYkXwXA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8y_xsGxvovt932JzqOF8pRQhDYOQ9E_dt461XszAkM6Mg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 7:54 PM David Marchand
<david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 8:06 AM Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:30 PM Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 7:00 PM Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
> > > >wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> The file rte_mempool_trace.h contains tracepoints which are internal
> > > >> to the mempool library. This file is renamed to mempool_trace.h, and
> > > >> is made an internal header. The tracepoints in this file are removed
> > > >> from the experimental section in version.map file.
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
> > > >
> > > >> @@ -47,22 +47,8 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> > > >> __rte_mempool_trace_generic_get;
> > > >> __rte_mempool_trace_get_bulk;
> > > >> __rte_mempool_trace_get_contig_blocks;
> > > >
> > > >I think, FP ones also can be removed.
> > >
> > > The FP symbols are used in header file rte_mempool.h. Removing the symbols will cause build
> > > failure in shared build.
> >
> > OK. Please update the below note documentation only for FP symbols then.
>
> I disagree.
>
> We may enhance this note, but it is not a matter of being FP / non-FP.
> A simple example is the "generic" non-FP tracepoints provided by EAL.
OK. Then what's your recommendation for the document update ?
Generic datatype exposed by EAL trace library or FP trace point
object. or something else?
I am trying to see what needs to be added/changed in documentation?
>
>
> --
> David Marchand
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-10 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-09 13:30 [PATCH v1 0/5] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-09 13:30 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] mempool: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-09 14:23 ` David Marchand
2023-02-10 5:32 ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-10 5:44 ` Jerin Jacob
2023-02-10 7:00 ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-10 7:06 ` Jerin Jacob
2023-02-10 14:24 ` David Marchand
2023-02-10 15:32 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2023-02-14 11:37 ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-20 14:18 ` David Marchand
2023-02-09 13:30 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] cryptodev: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-09 13:30 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] eal: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-09 13:30 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] ethdev: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-09 14:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-02-09 13:30 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] eventdev: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-10 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-10 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mempool: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-10 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] cryptodev: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-10 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] eal: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-10 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ethdev: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-10 14:19 ` David Marchand
2023-02-13 8:14 ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-10 10:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] eventdev: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-10 13:08 ` Jerin Jacob
2023-02-15 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-15 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mempool: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-15 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] cryptodev: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-15 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] eal: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-15 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] ethdev: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-15 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] eventdev: " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-02-20 14:39 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALBAE1PFjqnyqvrkTQGcbC7nQKQZTut4E9ttSYrqNpjeYkXwXA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).