From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>, Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>,
dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: add reserve fields to eventdev public structures
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 17:07:12 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1PJvJStFfqN-jE5N=1UudvEuoacOp3ZQ_+zv3Cd1AjLhA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200804104153.GA1464@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:12 PM Bruce Richardson
<bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 12:59:03PM +0530, pbhagavatula@marvell.com wrote:
> > From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
> >
> > Add 64 byte padding at the end of event device public structure to allow
> > future extensions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
> > Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > v2 Changes:
> > - Modify commit title.
> > - Add patch reference to doc.
> >
> > doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > index ea4cfa7a4..ec5db68e9 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > @@ -151,3 +151,14 @@ Deprecation Notices
> > Python 2 support will be completely removed in 20.11.
> > In 20.08, explicit deprecation warnings will be displayed when running
> > scripts with Python 2.
> > +
> > +* eventdev: A 64 byte padding is added at the end of the following structures
> > + in event device library to support future extensions:
> > + ``rte_event_crypto_adapter_conf``, ``rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_conf``,
> > + ``rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_conf``, ``rte_event_eth_tx_adapter_conf``,
> > + ``rte_event_timer_adapter_conf``, ``rte_event_timer_adapter_info``,
> > + ``rte_event_dev_info``, ``rte_event_dev_config``, ``rte_event_queue_conf``,
> > + ``rte_event_port_conf``, ``rte_event_timer_adapter``,
> > + ``rte_event_timer_adapter_data``.
> > + Reference:
> > + http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=10728&archive=both&state=*
> > --
>
> I don't like this idea of adding lots of padding to the ends of these
> structures. For some structures, such as the public arrays for devices it
> may be necessary, but for all the conf structures passed as parameters to
> functions I think we can do better. Since these structures are passed by
> the user to various functions, function versioning can be used to ensure
> that the correct function in eventdev is always called. From there to the
> individual PMDs, we can implement ABI compatibility by either:
> 1. including the length of the struct as a parameter to the driver. (This is
> a bit similar to my proposal for rawdev [1])
> 2. including the ABI version as a parameter to the driver.
But, Will the above solution work if the application is dependent on
struct size?
i.e change of s1 size will change offset of s3 i.e
app_sepecific_struct_s3. Right?
i.e DPDK version should not change the offset of s3. Right?
example,
struct app_struct {
struct dpdk_public_struct_s1 s1;
struct dpdk_public_struct_s2 s2;
struct app_sepecific_struct_s3 s3;
}
>
> Regards
> /Bruce
>
> [1] http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/?q=enhance+rawdev+APIs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-04 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-02 10:51 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce changes " pbhagavatula
2020-08-03 6:14 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-08-03 7:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc: add reserve fields " pbhagavatula
2020-08-04 10:41 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-08-04 11:37 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2020-08-04 14:24 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-08-04 16:03 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-08-04 16:24 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-08-04 17:18 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-08-05 9:18 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-08-05 10:07 ` Bruce Richardson
2020-08-04 16:20 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-08-05 8:46 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-08-05 9:10 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-08-06 0:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-08-06 16:57 ` Jerin Jacob
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALBAE1PJvJStFfqN-jE5N=1UudvEuoacOp3ZQ_+zv3Cd1AjLhA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=pbhagavatula@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).