DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
To: Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/9] pci cleanup and blacklist rework
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 09:39:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALwxeUt1gAHHWLYzdf8Ep575kDRGeQD=GbnP1L5T=XD9Q806uQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160208143153.0a01f7fe@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz>

Hello Jan,

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Jan Viktorin <viktorin@rehivetech.com> wrote:
> I am confused a bit. I started to review the "[PATCH 0/9] prepare for rte_device
> / rte_driver" series and then I've noticed there are 2 patch series having "pci:
> no need for dynamic tailq init" patch there. But then, there is this v2 that does
> not have this patch. What is the right one? What should I look at. Is related?

I splitted this initial series, because I want to dissociate the work
trying to get to rte_driver/rte_device from other work that modifies
pci code (blacklist rework and "autobind").

I think you want to look at [1], but, if you want the global picture,
first apply [1], then [2] ([2] is the v2 patchset which supersedes the
initial patchset that had this "pci:
no need for dynamic tailq init" patch in it).

[1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-January/032387.html
[2] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-January/032398.html


Regards,
-- 
David Marchand

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-09  8:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-22 15:27 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " David Marchand
2016-01-22 15:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/9] pci: no need for dynamic tailq init David Marchand
2016-01-22 15:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/9] pci: add internal device list helpers David Marchand
2016-01-22 15:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/9] pci: minor cleanup David Marchand
2016-01-22 15:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/9] pci: rework sysfs parsing for driver David Marchand
2016-01-22 15:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/9] pci: factorize probe/detach code David Marchand
2016-01-22 15:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/9] pci: cosmetic change David Marchand
2016-01-22 15:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/9] pci: factorize driver search David Marchand
2016-01-22 15:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 8/9] pci: remove driver lookup from detach David Marchand
2016-01-22 15:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 9/9] pci: blacklist only in global probe function David Marchand
2016-01-27 13:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/9] pci cleanup and blacklist rework David Marchand
2016-01-29 14:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " David Marchand
2016-01-29 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/9] pci: add internal device list helpers David Marchand
2016-01-29 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/9] pci/linux: minor cleanup David Marchand
2016-01-29 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/9] pci/linux: rework sysfs parsing for driver David Marchand
2016-01-29 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/9] pci: factorize probe/detach code David Marchand
2016-01-29 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/9] pci: cosmetic change David Marchand
2016-01-29 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/9] pci: factorize driver search David Marchand
2016-01-29 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/9] pci: remove driver lookup from detach David Marchand
2016-01-29 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 8/9] pci: implement blacklist using a hook David Marchand
2016-01-29 14:49   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 9/9] pci: implement automatic bind/unbind David Marchand
2016-02-03  9:26     ` Ivan Boule
2016-02-08 13:31   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/9] pci cleanup and blacklist rework Jan Viktorin
2016-02-09  8:39     ` David Marchand [this message]
2016-03-16 16:07   ` Jan Viktorin
2016-03-22 10:24     ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALwxeUt1gAHHWLYzdf8Ep575kDRGeQD=GbnP1L5T=XD9Q806uQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=viktorin@rehivetech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).