DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Dewar <alangordondewar@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com, tomasz.kantecki@intel.com,
	 jasvinder.singh@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org,
	Alan Dewar <alan.dewar@att.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] sched: make RED scaling configurable
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:50:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOEQf6h_jpLzpzX3nU_znw0iT4z1GsUToHs6UYk3dnYeuWrT5w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180115085252.1ea5d456@xeon-e3>

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Stephen Hemminger
<stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 16:16:09 +0000
> alangordondewar@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Looks like a good idea, minor editing feedback.
>
>
> > -     red_cfg->min_th = ((uint32_t) min_th) << (wq_log2 + RTE_RED_SCALING);
> > -     red_cfg->max_th = ((uint32_t) max_th) << (wq_log2 + RTE_RED_SCALING);
> > -     red_cfg->pa_const = (2 * (max_th - min_th) * maxp_inv) << RTE_RED_SCALING;
> > +     red_cfg->min_th = ((uint32_t) min_th) << (wq_log2 + rte_red_scaling);
> > +     red_cfg->max_th = ((uint32_t) max_th) << (wq_log2 + rte_red_scaling);
>
> While you are at it remove unnecessary parenthesis here.
>

Okay will do.

> > +     red_cfg->pa_const = (2 * (max_th - min_th) * maxp_inv) <<
> > +             rte_red_scaling;
>
> It reads easier if the the shift operator on the next line
>
>         red_cfg->pa_const = (2 * (max_th - min_th) * maxp_inv)
>                  << rte_red_scaling;
>

Okay will do.

> Why do functional tests have to be in same file and clutter the code?

Do you mean the same patch file or the same unit-test file?

I received feedback previously (might not have been this patch) where
I had split the functional changes and the new unit-tests into
separate patches and was asked to combine them into a single patch.  I
like the idea of if you have the fix you also have the new unit-tests.

As for having the new tests in the same file as existing tests, the
red tests are table driven so most of the changes to the unit-test
code are just adding new table entries to exercise the RED code with a
different scaling factor.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-16 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1507022514-21831-1>
2018-01-08 15:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " alangordondewar
2018-01-11 13:11   ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-01-12  9:38     ` Dewar, Alan
2018-01-12 11:09       ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-01-12 11:52         ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-01-15 15:36           ` Dewar, Alan
2018-01-16 11:56             ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-01-12 10:44     ` Dewar, Alan
2018-01-12 11:43       ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-01-15 16:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6] " alangordondewar
2018-01-15 16:52     ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-01-16 15:50       ` Alan Dewar [this message]
2018-01-16 15:57         ` Alan Dewar
2018-01-16 16:44           ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2018-01-16 16:07     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7] " alangordondewar
2019-04-05 15:36       ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-05 15:36         ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-08  8:24         ` Alan Dewar
2019-04-08  8:24           ` Alan Dewar
2019-04-08  8:53           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-08  8:53             ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-08 13:29             ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2019-04-08 13:29               ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2020-07-06 23:09               ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOEQf6h_jpLzpzX3nU_znw0iT4z1GsUToHs6UYk3dnYeuWrT5w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=alangordondewar@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan.dewar@att.com \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=tomasz.kantecki@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).