From: Andriy Berestovskyy <aber@semihalf.com>
To: Martin Weiser <martin.weiser@allegro-packets.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ixgbe: ierrors counter spuriously increasing in DPDK 2.1
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:56:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOysbxqZd2iFxcc3zGisi3LDJYdNPx1uoumi5OwVS=HTkQLzhw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5628943D.80401@allegro-packets.com>
Hi Martin,
We agreed on the main point: it's an issue. IMO the implementation
details are up to Maryam.
There have been few patches, so I guess it will be fixed in 2.2.
Andriy
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Martin Weiser
<martin.weiser@allegro-packets.com> wrote:
> Hi Andriy,
>
> thank you for pointing this discussion out to me. I somehow missed it.
> Unfortunately it looks like the discussion stopped after Maryam made a
> good proposal so I will vote in on that and hopefully get things started
> again.
>
> Best regards,
> Martin
>
>
>
> On 21.10.15 17:53, Andriy Berestovskyy wrote:
>> Yes Marcin,
>> The issue was discussed here:
>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-September/023229.html
>>
>> You can either fix the ierrors in ixgbe_dev_stats_get() or implement a
>> workaround in your app getting the extended statistics and counting
>> out some of extended counters from the ierrors.
>>
>> Here is an example:
>> https://github.com/Juniper/contrail-vrouter/commit/72f6ca05ac81d0ca5e7eb93c6ffe7a93648c2b00#diff-99c1f65a00658c7d38b3d1b64cb5fd93R1306
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andriy
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Martin Weiser
>> <martin.weiser@allegro-packets.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> with DPDK 2.1 we are seeing the ierrors counter increasing for 82599ES
>>> ports without reason. Even directly after starting test-pmd the error
>>> counter immediately is 1 without even a single packet being sent to the
>>> device:
>>>
>>> ./testpmd -c 0xfe -n 4 -- --portmask 0x3 --interactive
>>> ...
>>> testpmd> show port stats all
>>>
>>> ######################## NIC statistics for port 0 ########################
>>> RX-packets: 0 RX-missed: 0 RX-bytes: 0
>>> RX-badcrc: 0 RX-badlen: 0 RX-errors: 1
>>> RX-nombuf: 0
>>> TX-packets: 0 TX-errors: 0 TX-bytes: 0
>>> ############################################################################
>>>
>>> ######################## NIC statistics for port 1 ########################
>>> RX-packets: 0 RX-missed: 0 RX-bytes: 0
>>> RX-badcrc: 0 RX-badlen: 0 RX-errors: 1
>>> RX-nombuf: 0
>>> TX-packets: 0 TX-errors: 0 TX-bytes: 0
>>> ############################################################################
>>>
>>>
>>> When packet forwarding is started the ports perform normally and
>>> properly forward all packets but a huge number of ierrors is counted:
>>>
>>> testpmd> start
>>> ...
>>> testpmd> show port stats all
>>>
>>> ######################## NIC statistics for port 0 ########################
>>> RX-packets: 9011857 RX-missed: 0 RX-bytes: 5020932992
>>> RX-badcrc: 0 RX-badlen: 0 RX-errors: 9011753
>>> RX-nombuf: 0
>>> TX-packets: 9026250 TX-errors: 0 TX-bytes: 2922375542
>>> ############################################################################
>>>
>>> ######################## NIC statistics for port 1 ########################
>>> RX-packets: 9026250 RX-missed: 0 RX-bytes: 2922375542
>>> RX-badcrc: 0 RX-badlen: 0 RX-errors: 9026138
>>> RX-nombuf: 0
>>> TX-packets: 9011857 TX-errors: 0 TX-bytes: 5020932992
>>> ############################################################################
>>>
>>>
>>> When running the exact same test with DPDK version 2.0 no ierrors are
>>> reported.
>>> Is anyone else seeing strange ierrors being reported for Intel Niantic
>>> cards with DPDK 2.1?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Andriy Berestovskyy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-21 8:38 Martin Weiser
2015-10-21 15:53 ` Andriy Berestovskyy
2015-10-22 7:46 ` Martin Weiser
2015-10-22 10:56 ` Andriy Berestovskyy [this message]
2015-11-02 17:32 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2015-11-04 9:10 ` Martin Weiser
2015-11-04 15:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: remove l3_l4_xsum_errors from rx errors Harry van Haaren
2015-11-04 16:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-04 15:54 ` [dpdk-dev] ixgbe: ierrors counter spuriously increasing in DPDK 2.1 Van Haaren, Harry
2015-11-04 16:29 ` Martin Weiser
2015-11-04 16:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ixgbe: remove l3_l4_xsum_errors from rx errors Harry van Haaren
2015-11-04 16:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAOysbxqZd2iFxcc3zGisi3LDJYdNPx1uoumi5OwVS=HTkQLzhw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=aber@semihalf.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=martin.weiser@allegro-packets.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).