DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
	Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 19:55:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB448460414C3C8FEF764B5DB1D8FAA@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230811085440.415916-1-ndabilpuram@marvell.com>

> Subject: [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress
> 
> Similar to out of place(OOP) processing support that exists for
> Lookaside crypto/security sessions, Inline ingress security
> sessions may also need out of place processing in usecases
> where original encrypted packet needs to be retained for post
> processing. So for NIC's which have such a kind of HW support,
> a new SA option is provided to indicate whether OOP needs to
> be enabled on that Inline ingress security session or not.
> 
> Since for inline ingress sessions, packet is not received by
> CPU until the processing is done, we can only have per-SA
> option and not per-packet option like Lookaside sessions.
> 
> Also remove reserved_opts field from the rte_security_ipsec_sa_options
> struct as mentioned in deprecation notice.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
> ---
> v1:
> - Removed reserved_opts field from sa_options struct

Please update release notes and deprecation notice for this change.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-09-19 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-09  8:56 [RFC 1/2] " Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-03-09  8:56 ` [RFC 2/2] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 10:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 10:04   ` [PATCH 2/3] net/cnxk: support inline ingress out of place session Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 10:04   ` [PATCH 3/3] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 18:05   ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Stephen Hemminger
2023-04-18  8:33     ` Jerin Jacob
2023-04-24 22:41       ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-05-19  8:07         ` Jerin Jacob
2023-05-30  9:23           ` Jerin Jacob
2023-05-30 13:51             ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-05-31  9:26               ` Morten Brørup
2023-07-01  7:15   ` [PATCH] doc: announce addition of new security IPsec SA option Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-07-03 14:35     ` Akhil Goyal
2023-07-04  5:15     ` [PATCH v2] " Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-07-05 14:07       ` Jerin Jacob
2023-07-11  8:55         ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2023-07-06 23:05     ` [PATCH] " Ji, Kai
2023-08-11  8:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-08-11  8:54   ` [PATCH 2/3] net/cnxk: support inline ingress out of place session Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-08-11  8:54   ` [PATCH 3/3] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-19 19:55   ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2023-09-21  2:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-21  2:15   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] net/cnxk: support inline ingress out of place session Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-21  2:15   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-21 10:44   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CO6PR18MB448460414C3C8FEF764B5DB1D8FAA@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).