From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
"hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Fan Zhang <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>, Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com>,
"ciara.power@intel.com" <ciara.power@intel.com>,
"matan@nvidia.com" <matan@nvidia.com>,
Gagandeep Singh <g.singh@nxp.com>,
"konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru" <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
"stephen@networkplumber.org" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Nithin Kumar Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] doc: announce addition of new security IPsec SA option
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 14:35:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB44846642191D549A1390A126D829A@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230701071551.2027089-1-ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: announce addition of new security IPsec SA option
>
> Announce addition of new security IPsec SA option to enable
> out of place processing in Ingress Inline inbound SA's.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>
> ---
> doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> index 8e1cdd677a..20ce0a51af 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> @@ -156,3 +156,8 @@ Deprecation Notices
> The new port library API (functions rte_swx_port_*)
> will gradually transition from experimental to stable status
> starting with DPDK 23.07 release.
> +
> +* security: New sa option ``ingress_oop`` would be added in structure
> + ``rte_security_ipsec_sa_options`` to support out of place processing
> + for inline inbound SA's. ``reserved_opts`` size would be reduced by
> + 1 bit from DPDK 23.11.
As discussed in techboard meetings, reserved fields should not be added.
Hence we can update the above note to remove reserved_opts as well.
With that fixed.
Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
++ more people for acks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-03 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-09 8:56 [RFC 1/2] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-03-09 8:56 ` [RFC 2/2] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 10:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 10:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] net/cnxk: support inline ingress out of place session Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 10:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-04-11 18:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Stephen Hemminger
2023-04-18 8:33 ` Jerin Jacob
2023-04-24 22:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-05-19 8:07 ` Jerin Jacob
2023-05-30 9:23 ` Jerin Jacob
2023-05-30 13:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-05-31 9:26 ` Morten Brørup
2023-07-01 7:15 ` [PATCH] doc: announce addition of new security IPsec SA option Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-07-03 14:35 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2023-07-04 5:15 ` [PATCH v2] " Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-07-05 14:07 ` Jerin Jacob
2023-07-11 8:55 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2023-07-06 23:05 ` [PATCH] " Ji, Kai
2023-08-11 8:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-08-11 8:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] net/cnxk: support inline ingress out of place session Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-08-11 8:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-19 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Akhil Goyal
2023-09-21 2:15 ` [PATCH v2 " Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-21 2:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] net/cnxk: support inline ingress out of place session Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-21 2:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] test/security: add unittest for inline ingress oop Nithin Dabilpuram
2023-09-21 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] security: introduce out of place support for inline ingress Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CO6PR18MB44846642191D549A1390A126D829A@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fanzhang.oss@gmail.com \
--cc=g.singh@nxp.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=kai.ji@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).