From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>,
Fangming Fang <Fangming.Fang@arm.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Power, Ciara" <ciara.power@intel.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"Ji, Kai" <kai.ji@intel.com>, Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Ashwin Sekhar T K <asekhar@marvell.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: set and use session ID
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 09:38:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB4484DB18AC976FC7D70D5950D858A@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM8PR11MB55917C5C2EB33054E6090B1B8458A@DM8PR11MB5591.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > For info, this does not compile with
> > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__git.gitlab.arm.com_arm-2Dreference-2Dsolutions_ipsec-
> 2Dmb&d=DwIFAg&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=DnL7Si2wl_PRwpZ9TWey3e
> u68gBzn7DkPwuqhd6WNyo&m=g7xU0Pucoh3ZqU7RUlw8mhb-
> zlRr9t6XI0UCQi5vEjEfcovdH8kkXIJ_O-_c5zeg&s=J-l3-
> qBNnT5HJ7OGeu5iECPxB1jrpQ5iA01_AOC2Bac&e=
> > > > > because Arm did not merge Intel's code correctly, and
> > > > > imb_set_session() is missing while version is 1.4.0-dev.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway I hate this situation having 2 repos for the same thing.
> > > > > Please merge Arm code in the original repository from Intel.
> > > > >
> > > > Is it possible to make Arm repo as main repo and modify DPDK
> > > > documentation, if Intel not agreeing to include Arm code?
> > > > Currently the Arm repo use case is broken.
> > > > If it is not resolved soon, we can submit a patch to revert the
> > > > patch which is breaking compilation. This need to be fixed by RC2.
> > >
> > > It would be better if the original repo can merge Arm changes. We will
> > > keep regular sync with original repo in the current situation, the
> > > next sync will be carried out earlier in Q3.
> >
> > Yes, it is better to keep original repo. But if Intel is not agreeing to it, We may
> > need to find some alternate way to fix it.
> > We need a sync as soon as possible, as with current Arm repo, DPDK
> > compilation is broken.
> >
> > For now, we cannot merge anything in ipsec_mb driver till we fix the
> > compilation With Arm repo - either by Arm repo sync or by reverting the
> > patches.
>
> DPDK is supposed to use stable versions of the library (e.g. releases), not top of
> main branch.
> As described in README https://github.com/intel/intel-ipsec-mb#4-package-content , tip of
> the main is NOT a release software version.
> In case of ARM library clone, it is not clear what the latest stable version is.
> As the Intel library version is bumped in the first stages of development for the
> next release, it is advisable to avoid updating this version in ARM library, until a
> new Intel intel-ipsec-mb version is released.
> For now, the simplest solution is to revert the ARM library version to 1.3
> (changing IMB_VERSION_NUM and IMB_VERSION_STR), until the ARM repo is
> synced to Intel 1.4.0 (which has just been released).
>
Hi Pablo,
The point of discussion here is to have a common repo for both Intel and Arm.
We would have less control if there are 2 repos for same stuff.
The point is if Intel is not willing to take Arm changes in the repo (preferred solution),
Why not update documentation to make Arm one as default which is a
super set of Intel and Arm repo? This will avoid problems going forward.
Regards,
Akhil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-16 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-21 13:12 [PATCH 0/8] add AESNI_MB optimisations Ciara Power
2023-04-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 1/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: use GMAC dedicated algorithms Ciara Power
2023-04-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 2/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: use burst API in aesni_mb Ciara Power
2023-04-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 3/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: use new SGL API Ciara Power
2023-04-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 4/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: remove unneeded fields in crypto session Ciara Power
2023-04-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 5/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: store template job Ciara Power
2023-04-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 6/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: optimize for GCM case Ciara Power
2023-04-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 7/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: do not free linear_sgl always Ciara Power
2023-04-21 13:12 ` [PATCH 8/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: set and use session ID Ciara Power
2024-02-22 20:52 ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2023-05-16 12:25 ` [EXT] [PATCH 0/8] add AESNI_MB optimisations Akhil Goyal
2023-05-16 12:54 ` Power, Ciara
2023-05-16 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 " Ciara Power
2023-05-16 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: use GMAC dedicated algorithms Ciara Power
2023-05-16 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: use burst API in aesni_mb Ciara Power
2023-05-16 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: use new SGL API Ciara Power
2023-05-16 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: remove unneeded fields in crypto session Ciara Power
2023-05-16 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: store template job Ciara Power
2023-05-16 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: optimize for GCM case Ciara Power
2023-05-16 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: do not free linear_sgl always Ciara Power
2023-05-16 15:24 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] crypto/ipsec_mb: set and use session ID Ciara Power
2023-06-10 20:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-14 5:35 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2023-06-15 2:46 ` Fangming Fang
2023-06-15 4:47 ` Akhil Goyal
2023-06-16 9:25 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2023-06-16 9:38 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2023-06-20 6:32 ` Fangming Fang
2024-02-21 5:01 ` Patrick Robb
2024-02-21 5:10 ` [EXT] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2024-02-21 5:23 ` Patrick Robb
2024-02-21 9:50 ` Power, Ciara
2024-02-21 19:09 ` Patrick Robb
2024-02-22 1:55 ` [EXT] " Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-02-26 23:23 ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2024-02-27 1:05 ` Patrick Robb
2024-02-27 6:13 ` Akhil Goyal
2024-03-05 17:36 ` Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage
2023-06-20 14:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-06-21 19:11 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2023-05-17 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] add AESNI_MB optimisations Ji, Kai
2023-05-24 11:44 ` Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CO6PR18MB4484DB18AC976FC7D70D5950D858A@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=Fangming.Fang@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
--cc=asekhar@marvell.com \
--cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=kai.ji@intel.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).