From: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
To: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>,
"roy.fan.zhang@intel.com" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH 13/40] test/crypto: remove asym crypto next xform
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 07:24:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CO6PR18MB4484E830CF4D5C1877C54C63D8D39@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220520055445.40063-14-arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
> - removed asymnetric crypto xform next field.
> This commit reflects changes to the asymmetric crypto API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arek Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
> ---
> app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c | 100 -----------------------------
> app/test/test_cryptodev_dh_test_vectors.h | 1 -
> app/test/test_cryptodev_dsa_test_vectors.h | 1 -
> app/test/test_cryptodev_mod_test_vectors.h | 2 -
> app/test/test_cryptodev_rsa_test_vectors.h | 2 -
> app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c | 4 --
> 6 files changed, 110 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
> index 0098b6bf65..9e5d5e4f27 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
> @@ -318,7 +318,6 @@ test_cryptodev_asym_op(struct
> crypto_testsuite_params_asym *ts_params,
>
> int ret, status = TEST_SUCCESS;
>
> - xform_tc.next = NULL;
> xform_tc.xform_type = data_tc->modex.xform_type;
>
> cap_idx.type = xform_tc.xform_type;
> @@ -1063,7 +1062,6 @@ test_dh_gen_shared_sec(struct
> rte_crypto_asym_xform *xfrm)
>
> /* Setup a xform and op to generate private key only */
> xform.dh.type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_SHARED_SECRET_COMPUTE;
> - xform.next = NULL;
> asym_op->dh.priv_key.data = dh_test_params.priv_key.data;
> asym_op->dh.priv_key.length = dh_test_params.priv_key.length;
> asym_op->dh.pub_key.data = (uint8_t *)peer;
> @@ -1145,7 +1143,6 @@ test_dh_gen_priv_key(struct rte_crypto_asym_xform
> *xfrm)
>
> /* Setup a xform and op to generate private key only */
> xform.dh.type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_PRIVATE_KEY_GENERATE;
> - xform.next = NULL;
> asym_op->dh.priv_key.data = output;
> asym_op->dh.priv_key.length = sizeof(output);
>
> @@ -1228,7 +1225,6 @@ test_dh_gen_pub_key(struct rte_crypto_asym_xform
> *xfrm)
> *
> */
> xform.dh.type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_PUBLIC_KEY_GENERATE;
> - xform.next = NULL;
>
> asym_op->dh.pub_key.data = output;
> asym_op->dh.pub_key.length = sizeof(output);
> @@ -1288,94 +1284,6 @@ test_dh_gen_pub_key(struct
> rte_crypto_asym_xform *xfrm)
> }
>
> static int
> -test_dh_gen_kp(struct rte_crypto_asym_xform *xfrm)
Why is this function removed?
> -{
> - struct crypto_testsuite_params_asym *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> - struct rte_mempool *op_mpool = ts_params->op_mpool;
> - struct rte_mempool *sess_mpool = ts_params->session_mpool;
> - uint8_t dev_id = ts_params->valid_devs[0];
> - struct rte_crypto_asym_op *asym_op = NULL;
> - struct rte_crypto_op *op = NULL, *result_op = NULL;
> - void *sess = NULL;
> - int ret, status = TEST_SUCCESS;
> - uint8_t out_pub_key[TEST_DH_MOD_LEN];
> - uint8_t out_prv_key[TEST_DH_MOD_LEN];
> - struct rte_crypto_asym_xform pub_key_xform;
> - struct rte_crypto_asym_xform xform = *xfrm;
> -
> - /* set up crypto op data structure */
> - op = rte_crypto_op_alloc(op_mpool,
> RTE_CRYPTO_OP_TYPE_ASYMMETRIC);
> - if (!op) {
> - RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1,
> - "line %u FAILED: %s",
> - __LINE__, "Failed to allocate asymmetric crypto "
> - "operation struct");
> - status = TEST_FAILED;
> - goto error_exit;
> - }
> - asym_op = op->asym;
> - /* Setup a xform chain to generate
> - * private key first followed by
> - * public key
> - */
> - xform.dh.type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_PRIVATE_KEY_GENERATE;
> - pub_key_xform.xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_DH;
> - pub_key_xform.dh.type =
> RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_KE_PUBLIC_KEY_GENERATE;
> - xform.next = &pub_key_xform;
> -
> - asym_op->dh.pub_key.data = out_pub_key;
> - asym_op->dh.pub_key.length = sizeof(out_pub_key);
> - asym_op->dh.priv_key.data = out_prv_key;
> - asym_op->dh.priv_key.length = sizeof(out_prv_key);
> -
> - ret = rte_cryptodev_asym_session_create(dev_id, &xform, sess_mpool,
> &sess);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1,
> - "line %u FAILED: %s", __LINE__,
> - "Session creation failed");
> - status = (ret == -ENOTSUP) ? TEST_SKIPPED : TEST_FAILED;
> - goto error_exit;
> - }
> -
> - /* attach asymmetric crypto session to crypto operations */
> - rte_crypto_op_attach_asym_session(op, sess);
> -
> - RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1, "Process ASYM operation");
> -
> - /* Process crypto operation */
> - if (rte_cryptodev_enqueue_burst(dev_id, 0, &op, 1) != 1) {
> - RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1,
> - "line %u FAILED: %s",
> - __LINE__, "Error sending packet for operation");
> - status = TEST_FAILED;
> - goto error_exit;
> - }
> -
> - while (rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst(dev_id, 0, &result_op, 1) == 0)
> - rte_pause();
> -
> - if (result_op == NULL) {
> - RTE_LOG(ERR, USER1,
> - "line %u FAILED: %s",
> - __LINE__, "Failed to process asym crypto op");
> - status = TEST_FAILED;
> - goto error_exit;
> - }
> - debug_hexdump(stdout, "priv key:",
> - out_prv_key, asym_op->dh.priv_key.length);
> - debug_hexdump(stdout, "pub key:",
> - out_pub_key, asym_op->dh.pub_key.length);
> -
> -error_exit:
> - if (sess != NULL)
> - rte_cryptodev_asym_session_free(dev_id, sess);
> - if (op != NULL)
> - rte_crypto_op_free(op);
> -
> - return status;
> -}
> -
> -static int
> test_mod_inv(void)
> {
> struct crypto_testsuite_params_asym *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> @@ -1611,12 +1519,6 @@ test_dh_keygenration(void)
> dh_test_params.priv_key.length);
>
> RTE_LOG(INFO, USER1,
> - "Test Public and Private key pair generation\n");
> -
> - status = test_dh_gen_kp(&dh_xform);
> - TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(status, 0, "Test failed");
> -
> - RTE_LOG(INFO, USER1,
> "Test Public Key Generation using pre-defined priv key\n");
>
> status = test_dh_gen_pub_key(&dh_xform);
> @@ -1828,7 +1730,6 @@ test_ecdsa_sign_verify(enum curve curve_id)
> asym_op = op->asym;
>
> /* Setup asym xform */
> - xform.next = NULL;
> xform.xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_ECDSA;
> xform.ec.curve_id = input_params.curve;
>
> @@ -2030,7 +1931,6 @@ test_ecpm(enum curve curve_id)
> asym_op = op->asym;
>
> /* Setup asym xform */
> - xform.next = NULL;
> xform.xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_ECPM;
> xform.ec.curve_id = input_params.curve;
>
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_dh_test_vectors.h
> b/app/test/test_cryptodev_dh_test_vectors.h
> index fe7510dcd3..078719072d 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_dh_test_vectors.h
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_dh_test_vectors.h
> @@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ struct dh_test_param dh_test_params = {
> };
>
> struct rte_crypto_asym_xform dh_xform = {
> - .next = NULL,
> .xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_DH,
> .dh = {
> .p = {
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_dsa_test_vectors.h
> b/app/test/test_cryptodev_dsa_test_vectors.h
> index bbcb0d7297..cc60f50b5c 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_dsa_test_vectors.h
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_dsa_test_vectors.h
> @@ -91,7 +91,6 @@ struct dsa_test_param dsa_test_params = {
> };
>
> struct rte_crypto_asym_xform dsa_xform = {
> - .next = NULL,
> .xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_DSA,
> .dsa = {
> .p = {
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_mod_test_vectors.h
> b/app/test/test_cryptodev_mod_test_vectors.h
> index 807ca7a47e..bcd4d5248b 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_mod_test_vectors.h
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_mod_test_vectors.h
> @@ -1045,7 +1045,6 @@ uint8_t mod_inv[] = {
>
> /* MODEX vector. 8< */
> struct rte_crypto_asym_xform modex_xform = {
> - .next = NULL,
> .xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_MODEX,
> .modex = {
> .modulus = {
> @@ -1061,7 +1060,6 @@ struct rte_crypto_asym_xform modex_xform = {
> /* >8 End of MODEX vector. */
>
> struct rte_crypto_asym_xform modinv_xform = {
> - .next = NULL,
> .xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_MODINV,
> .modinv = {
> .modulus = {
> diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_rsa_test_vectors.h
> b/app/test/test_cryptodev_rsa_test_vectors.h
> index 04539a1ecf..e769dec1f4 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_rsa_test_vectors.h
> +++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_rsa_test_vectors.h
> @@ -346,7 +346,6 @@ uint8_t rsa_qInv[] = {
>
> /** rsa xform using exponent key */
> struct rte_crypto_asym_xform rsa_xform = {
> - .next = NULL,
> .xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_RSA,
> .rsa = {
> .n = {
> @@ -367,7 +366,6 @@ struct rte_crypto_asym_xform rsa_xform = {
>
> /** rsa xform using quintuple key */
> struct rte_crypto_asym_xform rsa_xform_crt = {
> - .next = NULL,
> .xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_RSA,
> .rsa = {
> .n = {
> diff --git a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> index 2ecc7e2cea..feb1d86c00 100644
> --- a/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> +++ b/app/test/test_event_crypto_adapter.c
> @@ -295,7 +295,6 @@ test_op_forward_mode(uint8_t session_less)
> #endif
> /* Setup Cipher Parameters */
> cipher_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
> - cipher_xform.next = NULL;
> cipher_xform.cipher.algo = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_NULL;
> cipher_xform.cipher.op = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_ENCRYPT;
>
> @@ -474,7 +473,6 @@ test_asym_op_forward_mode(uint8_t session_less)
> return TEST_SKIPPED;
> }
> /* Setup Cipher Parameters */
> - xform_tc.next = NULL;
> xform_tc.xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_MODEX;
> cap_idx.type = xform_tc.xform_type;
> capability = rte_cryptodev_asym_capability_get(TEST_CDEV_ID,
> &cap_idx);
> @@ -672,7 +670,6 @@ test_op_new_mode(uint8_t session_less)
> #endif
> /* Setup Cipher Parameters */
> cipher_xform.type = RTE_CRYPTO_SYM_XFORM_CIPHER;
> - cipher_xform.next = NULL;
> cipher_xform.cipher.algo = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_NULL;
> cipher_xform.cipher.op = RTE_CRYPTO_CIPHER_OP_ENCRYPT;
>
> @@ -807,7 +804,6 @@ test_asym_op_new_mode(uint8_t session_less)
> return TEST_SKIPPED;
> }
> /* Setup Cipher Parameters */
> - xform_tc.next = NULL;
> xform_tc.xform_type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_MODEX;
> cap_idx.type = xform_tc.xform_type;
> capability = rte_cryptodev_asym_capability_get(TEST_CDEV_ID,
> &cap_idx);
> --
> 2.13.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-20 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-20 5:54 [PATCH 00/40] cryptodev: rsa, dh, ecdh changes Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 01/40] cryptodev: redefine ec group enum Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 02/40] cryptodev: remove list end enumerators Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 7:19 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 03/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 04/40] cryptodev: reduce number of comments in asym xform Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 10:59 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 17:37 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 5:44 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 05/40] test/crypto: removed asym xform none Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 06/40] cryptodev: separate key exchange operation enum Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 11:45 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 07/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 08/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 7:18 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 09/40] cryptodev: remove unnecessary zero assignement Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 7:13 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 10/40] cryptodev: remove comment about using ephemeral key in dsa Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 11/40] cryptodev: remove asym crypto next xform Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 7:22 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 11:12 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 14:47 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 6:06 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 6:36 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 7:05 ` Anoob Joseph
2022-05-27 6:30 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-27 6:40 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-27 6:55 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-27 7:27 ` Anoob Joseph
2022-05-27 7:47 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 12/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 13/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 7:24 ` Akhil Goyal [this message]
2022-05-20 7:38 ` [EXT] " Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 14/40] app/test-crypto-perf: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 15/40] app/test-eventdev: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 7:25 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 16/40] cryptodev: move dh type from xform to dh op Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 11:52 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 17/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 18/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 19/40] cryptodev: changed order of dh fields Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 20/40] cryptodev: add elliptic curve diffie hellman Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:08 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 14:52 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-24 14:55 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 6:02 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 6:33 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 21/40] cryptodev: add public key verify option Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:12 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 14:59 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 6:00 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 6:30 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 22/40] cryptodev: move RSA padding into separate struct Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 23/40] crypto/qat: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 24/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 25/40] crypto/octeontx: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 26/40] crypto/cnxk: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 27/40] common/cpt: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 28/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 29/40] cryptodev: add salt length and optional label Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:30 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 15:14 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 5:57 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 30/40] cryptodev: reduce rsa struct to only necessary fields Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:52 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 15:33 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 5:48 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 31/40] crypto/qat: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 32/40] crypto/openssl: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 33/40] crypto/octeontx: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 34/40] crypto/cnxk: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 35/40] common/cpt: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 36/40] test/crypto: " Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 37/40] cryptodev: add asym op flags Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 12:07 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 38/40] cryptodev: clarify usage of private key in dh Arek Kusztal
2022-05-24 12:56 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2022-05-24 14:30 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-25 6:09 ` Akhil Goyal
2022-05-25 6:37 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 39/40] crypto/openssl: generate dh private key Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 5:54 ` [PATCH 40/40] test/crypto: added test for dh priv key generation Arek Kusztal
2022-05-20 7:30 ` [EXT] [PATCH 00/40] cryptodev: rsa, dh, ecdh changes Akhil Goyal
2022-05-20 7:37 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CO6PR18MB4484E830CF4D5C1877C54C63D8D39@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com \
--to=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).