DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Carrillo, Erik G" <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
To: Phil Yang <Phil.Yang@arm.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>,
	"Dharmik Thakkar" <Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] eventdev: relax smp barriers with c11 atomics
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:38:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY4PR1101MB2118A14EB760326385CE3929B9940@CY4PR1101MB2118.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR08MB464086A9E268D36233CB605FE9970@VE1PR08MB4640.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Phil,

Comment in-line:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Yang <Phil.Yang@arm.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 5:12 AM
> To: Phil Yang <Phil.Yang@arm.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Carrillo, Erik G
> <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
> Cc: drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>; Dharmik Thakkar
> <Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] eventdev: relax smp barriers with c11
> atomics
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Phil Yang
> > Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 7:20 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org; erik.g.carrillo@intel.com
> > Cc: drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>;
> > Dharmik Thakkar <Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com>; nd <nd@arm.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] eventdev: relax smp barriers with c11
> > atomics
> >
> > The implementation-specific opaque data is shared between arm and
> > cancel operations. The state flag acts as a guard variable to make
> > sure the update of opaque data is synchronized. This patch uses c11
> > atomics with explicit one way memory barrier instead of full barriers
> > rte_smp_w/rmb() to synchronize the opaque data between timer arm and
> cancel threads.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar <dharmik.thakkar@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c | 55
> > ++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.h |  2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
> > b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
> > index 6947efb..0a26501 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.c
> > @@ -629,7 +629,8 @@ swtim_callback(struct rte_timer *tim)
> >  		sw->expired_timers[sw->n_expired_timers++] = tim;
> >  		sw->stats.evtim_exp_count++;
> >
> > -		evtim->state = RTE_EVENT_TIMER_NOT_ARMED;
> > +		__atomic_store_n(&evtim->state,
> > RTE_EVENT_TIMER_NOT_ARMED,
> > +				 __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> >  	}
> >
> >  	if (event_buffer_batch_ready(&sw->buffer)) { @@ -1020,6 +1021,7
> @@
> > __swtim_arm_burst(const struct rte_event_timer_adapter *adapter,
> >  	int n_lcores;
> >  	/* Timer is not armed state */
> >  	int16_t exp_state = 0;
> > +	enum rte_event_timer_state n_state;
> >
> >  #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_EVENTDEV_DEBUG
> >  	/* Check that the service is running. */ @@ -1060,30 +1062,36 @@
> > __swtim_arm_burst(const struct rte_event_timer_adapter *adapter,
> >  	}
> >
> >  	for (i = 0; i < nb_evtims; i++) {
> > -		/* Don't modify the event timer state in these cases */
> > -		if (evtims[i]->state == RTE_EVENT_TIMER_ARMED) {
> > +		n_state = __atomic_load_n(&evtims[i]->state,
> > __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> > +		if (n_state == RTE_EVENT_TIMER_ARMED) {
> >  			rte_errno = EALREADY;
> >  			break;
> > -		} else if (!(evtims[i]->state ==
> > RTE_EVENT_TIMER_NOT_ARMED ||
> > -			     evtims[i]->state ==
> > RTE_EVENT_TIMER_CANCELED)) {
> > +		} else if (!(n_state == RTE_EVENT_TIMER_NOT_ARMED ||
> > +			     n_state == RTE_EVENT_TIMER_CANCELED)) {
> >  			rte_errno = EINVAL;
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >
> >  		ret = check_timeout(evtims[i], adapter);
> >  		if (unlikely(ret == -1)) {
> > -			evtims[i]->state =
> > RTE_EVENT_TIMER_ERROR_TOOLATE;
> > +			__atomic_store_n(&evtims[i]->state,
> > +
> 	RTE_EVENT_TIMER_ERROR_TOOLATE,
> > +					__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> >  			rte_errno = EINVAL;
> >  			break;
> >  		} else if (unlikely(ret == -2)) {
> > -			evtims[i]->state =
> > RTE_EVENT_TIMER_ERROR_TOOEARLY;
> > +			__atomic_store_n(&evtims[i]->state,
> > +
> > 	RTE_EVENT_TIMER_ERROR_TOOEARLY,
> > +					__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> >  			rte_errno = EINVAL;
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >
> >  		if (unlikely(check_destination_event_queue(evtims[i],
> >  							   adapter) < 0)) {
> > -			evtims[i]->state = RTE_EVENT_TIMER_ERROR;
> > +			__atomic_store_n(&evtims[i]->state,
> > +					RTE_EVENT_TIMER_ERROR,
> > +					__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> >  			rte_errno = EINVAL;
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> > @@ -1099,13 +1107,18 @@ __swtim_arm_burst(const struct
> > rte_event_timer_adapter *adapter,
> >  					  SINGLE, lcore_id, NULL, evtims[i]);
> >  		if (ret < 0) {
> >  			/* tim was in RUNNING or CONFIG state */
> > -			evtims[i]->state = RTE_EVENT_TIMER_ERROR;
> > +			__atomic_store_n(&evtims[i]->state,
> > +					RTE_EVENT_TIMER_ERROR,
> > +					__ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >
> > -		rte_smp_wmb();
> >  		EVTIM_LOG_DBG("armed an event timer");
> > -		evtims[i]->state = RTE_EVENT_TIMER_ARMED;
> > +		/* RELEASE ordering guarantees the adapter specific value
> > +		 * changes observed before the update of state.
> > +		 */
> > +		__atomic_store_n(&evtims[i]->state,
> > RTE_EVENT_TIMER_ARMED,
> > +				__ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> >  	}
> >
> >  	if (i < nb_evtims)
> > @@ -1132,6 +1145,7 @@ swtim_cancel_burst(const struct
> > rte_event_timer_adapter *adapter,
> >  	struct rte_timer *timp;
> >  	uint64_t opaque;
> >  	struct swtim *sw = swtim_pmd_priv(adapter);
> > +	enum rte_event_timer_state n_state;
> >
> >  #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_EVENTDEV_DEBUG
> >  	/* Check that the service is running. */ @@ -1143,16 +1157,18 @@
> > swtim_cancel_burst(const struct rte_event_timer_adapter *adapter,
> >
> >  	for (i = 0; i < nb_evtims; i++) {
> >  		/* Don't modify the event timer state in these cases */
> > -		if (evtims[i]->state == RTE_EVENT_TIMER_CANCELED) {
> > +		/* ACQUIRE ordering guarantees the access of
> > implementation
> > +		 * specific opague data under the correct state.
> > +		 */
> > +		n_state = __atomic_load_n(&evtims[i]->state,
> > __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> > +		if (n_state == RTE_EVENT_TIMER_CANCELED) {
> >  			rte_errno = EALREADY;
> >  			break;
> > -		} else if (evtims[i]->state != RTE_EVENT_TIMER_ARMED) {
> > +		} else if (n_state != RTE_EVENT_TIMER_ARMED) {
> >  			rte_errno = EINVAL;
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >
> > -		rte_smp_rmb();
> > -
> >  		opaque = evtims[i]->impl_opaque[0];
> >  		timp = (struct rte_timer *)(uintptr_t)opaque;
> >  		RTE_ASSERT(timp != NULL);
> > @@ -1166,11 +1182,14 @@ swtim_cancel_burst(const struct
> > rte_event_timer_adapter *adapter,
> >
> >  		rte_mempool_put(sw->tim_pool, (void **)timp);
> >
> > -		evtims[i]->state = RTE_EVENT_TIMER_CANCELED;
> > +		__atomic_store_n(&evtims[i]->state,
> > RTE_EVENT_TIMER_CANCELED,
> > +				__ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> >  		evtims[i]->impl_opaque[0] = 0;
> >  		evtims[i]->impl_opaque[1] = 0;
> 
> Is that safe to remove impl_opaque cleanup above?
> 
> Once the soft timer canceled, the __swtim_arm_burst cannot access these
> two fields under the RTE_EVENT_TIMER_CANCELED state.
> After new timer armed, it refills these two fields in the __swtim_arm_burst
> thread, which is the only producer of these two fields.
> I think the only risk is that the values of these two field might be unknow
> after swtim_cancel_burst.
> So it should be safe to remove them if no other thread access them after
> canceling the timer.
> 
> Any comments on this?
> If we remove these two instructions, we can also remove the
> __atomic_thread_fence below to save performance penalty.
> 
> Thanks,
> Phil
> 

In this case, I see the fence as (more importantly) ensuring the state update is visible to other threads... do I misunderstand?   I suppose we could also update the state with an __atomic_store(..., __ATOMIC_RELEASE), but perhaps that roughly equivalent?

> > -
> > -		rte_smp_wmb();
> > +		/* The RELEASE fence make sure the clean up
> > +		 * of opaque data observed between threads.
> > +		 */
> > +		__atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> >  	}
> >
> >  	return i;
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.h
> > b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.h
> > index d2ebcb0..6f64b90 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eventdev/rte_event_timer_adapter.h
> > @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ struct rte_event_timer {
> >  	 *  - op: RTE_EVENT_OP_NEW
> >  	 *  - event_type: RTE_EVENT_TYPE_TIMER
> >  	 */
> > -	volatile enum rte_event_timer_state state;
> > +	enum rte_event_timer_state state;
> >  	/**< State of the event timer. */
> >  	uint64_t timeout_ticks;
> >  	/**< Expiry timer ticks expressed in number of *timer_ticks_ns*
> from
> > --
> > 2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-23 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-12 11:19 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Phil Yang
2020-06-12 11:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] eventdev: use c11 atomics for lcore timer armed flag Phil Yang
2020-06-23 21:01   ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-06-28 16:12     ` Phil Yang
2020-06-23 21:20   ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-06-23 21:31     ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-06-28 16:32       ` Phil Yang
2020-06-12 11:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] eventdev: relax smp barriers with c11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-06-22 10:12   ` Phil Yang
2020-06-23 19:38     ` Carrillo, Erik G [this message]
2020-06-28 17:33       ` Phil Yang
2020-06-29 18:07         ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-06-18 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Carrillo, Erik G
2020-06-18 18:25   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-22  9:48     ` Phil Yang
2020-07-01 11:22       ` Jerin Jacob
2020-07-02  3:28         ` Phil Yang
2020-07-02  3:26     ` Phil Yang
2020-07-02  3:56       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-07-02 21:15         ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-07-02 21:30           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2020-06-22  9:09   ` Phil Yang
2020-07-02  5:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] " Phil Yang
2020-07-02  5:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] eventdev: use c11 atomics for lcore timer armed flag Phil Yang
2020-07-02 20:21     ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-07-02  5:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] eventdev: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-07-03  3:35     ` Dharmik Thakkar
2020-07-02  5:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] eventdev: relax smp barriers with c11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-07-02 20:30     ` Carrillo, Erik G
2020-07-03 10:50       ` Jerin Jacob
2020-07-06 10:04     ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-06 15:32       ` Phil Yang
2020-07-06 15:40         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-07 11:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Phil Yang
2020-07-07 11:13     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] eventdev: use C11 atomics for lcore timer armed flag Phil Yang
2020-07-07 11:13     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] eventdev: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-07-07 11:13     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] eventdev: relax smp barriers with C11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-07-07 14:29       ` Jerin Jacob
2020-07-07 15:56         ` Phil Yang
2020-07-07 15:54     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Phil Yang
2020-07-07 15:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] eventdev: use C11 atomics for lcore timer armed flag Phil Yang
2020-07-07 15:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] eventdev: remove redundant code Phil Yang
2020-07-07 15:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] eventdev: relax smp barriers with C11 atomics Phil Yang
2020-07-08 13:30       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] eventdev: fix race condition on timer list counter Jerin Jacob
2020-07-08 15:01         ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CY4PR1101MB2118A14EB760326385CE3929B9940@CY4PR1101MB2118.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
    --cc=Dharmik.Thakkar@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Phil.Yang@arm.com \
    --cc=Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).