DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Harton (dharton)" <dharton@cisco.com>
To: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
	"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for ixgbvef
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 14:01:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CY4PR11MB170162D6FA06FADBCD87E41EAA4C0@CY4PR11MB1701.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E70611533490C5@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>

Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2019 8:11 AM
> To: David Harton (dharton) <dharton@cisco.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Lu, Wenzhuo
> <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for
> ixgbvef
> 
> Hi
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of David Harton
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2019 11:24 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org; Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Ananyev,
> > Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> > Cc: David Harton <dharton@cisco.com>
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for
> > ixgbvef
> >
> > ixgevf vlan strip and extend capabilities were removed when migrating
> > to the bit flags implementation.
> >
> > Restoring the capbility to enable these offloads at configuration time.
> >
> > Fixes: ec3b1124d14d (\"net/ixgbe: convert to new Rx offloads API\")
> > Signed-off-by: David Harton <dharton@cisco.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 6 ++----
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c index e92a70fb3..95c32257c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > @@ -2853,15 +2853,13 @@ ixgbe_get_rx_port_offloads(struct rte_eth_dev
> > *dev)
> >  		   DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TCP_CKSUM   |
> >  		   DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_KEEP_CRC    |
> >  		   DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_JUMBO_FRAME |
> > +		   DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER |
> > +		   DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND |
> >  		   DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_SCATTER;
> >
> >  	if (hw->mac.type == ixgbe_mac_82598EB)
> >  		offloads |= DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_STRIP;
> >
> > -	if (ixgbe_is_vf(dev) == 0)
> 
> Patchwork shows "build patch error" for ci/Performance-Testing.
> Seems this is the only place ixgbe_is_vf is used, so it can also be
> removed

Yes, I didn't notice that.  Assuming people are good with the fundamental change I'll post a new patch with ixgbe_is_vf removed.

Thanks,
Dave

> 
> > -		offloads |= (DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_FILTER |
> > -			     DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_VLAN_EXTEND);
> > -
> >  	/*
> >  	 * RSC is only supported by 82599 and x540 PF devices in a non-SR-
> IOV
> >  	 * mode.
> > --
> > 2.19.1

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-07 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-06 15:23 David Harton
2019-03-07 13:11 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-07 14:01   ` David Harton (dharton) [this message]
2019-03-08  6:35 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-08 12:38   ` David Harton (dharton)
2019-03-11  2:02     ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-08 20:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter/extend for ixgbevf David Harton
2019-03-14 13:37   ` David Harton (dharton)
2019-03-14 13:37     ` David Harton (dharton)
2019-03-14 15:14     ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-14 15:14       ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-14 15:51       ` David Harton (dharton)
2019-03-14 15:51         ` David Harton (dharton)
2019-03-15  1:20         ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-15  1:20           ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-15  4:13           ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-15  4:13             ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-15  5:28           ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-15  5:28             ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-15  7:36             ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-15  7:36               ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-15  9:23             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-15  9:23               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-15  9:35               ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-15  9:35                 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-15 12:59                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-15 12:59                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-03-18  3:13                   ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-18  3:13                     ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-15 12:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " David Harton
2019-03-15 12:26     ` David Harton
2019-03-15 16:08     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] net/ixgbe: Restore vlan filter " David Harton
2019-03-15 16:08       ` David Harton
2019-03-18  3:05       ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-18  3:05         ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-18  4:59         ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-18  4:59           ` Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CY4PR11MB170162D6FA06FADBCD87E41EAA4C0@CY4PR11MB1701.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=dharton@cisco.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).