From: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
To: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Olga Shern" <olgas@mellanox.com>,
Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/7] net/mlx4: inline more Tx functions
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 21:42:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB5PR05MB1254024B3918471086AC914DD1440@DB5PR05MB1254.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171025164938.GH26782@6wind.com>
Hi Adrien,
On Wednesday, October 25, 2017 7:50 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
>
> Hi Ophir,
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 02:21:55PM +0000, Ophir Munk wrote:
> > Change functions to inline on Tx fast path to improve performance
> >
> > Inside the inline function call other functions to handle "unlikely"
> > cases such that the inline function code footprint is small.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
>
> Reading this, it's like adding __rte_always_inline improves performance at
> all, which I doubt unless you can show proof through performance results.
>
> When in doubt, leave it to the compiler, the static keyword is usually enough
> of a hint. Too much forced inlining may actually be harmful.
>
> What this patch really does is splitting the heavy lookup/registration function
> in two halves with one small static inline function for the lookup part that
> calls the separate registration part in the unlikely event MR is not already
> registered.
>
> Thankfully the compiler doesn't inline the large registration function back,
> which results in the perceived performance improvement for the time being,
> however there is no guarantee it won't happen in the future (you didn't use
> the noinline keyword on the registration function for that).
>
> Therefore I have a bunch of comments and suggestions, see below.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxtx.c | 43
> > ++++++------------------------------
> > drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxtx.h | 52
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxtx.c
> > b/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxtx.c index 011ea79..ae37f9b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxtx.c
> > @@ -220,54 +220,25 @@ mlx4_txq_complete(struct txq *txq)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -/**
> > - * Get memory pool (MP) from mbuf. If mbuf is indirect, the pool from
> > which
> > - * the cloned mbuf is allocated is returned instead.
> > - *
> > - * @param buf
> > - * Pointer to mbuf.
> > - *
> > - * @return
> > - * Memory pool where data is located for given mbuf.
> > - */
> > -static struct rte_mempool *
> > -mlx4_txq_mb2mp(struct rte_mbuf *buf)
> > -{
> > - if (unlikely(RTE_MBUF_INDIRECT(buf)))
> > - return rte_mbuf_from_indirect(buf)->pool;
> > - return buf->pool;
> > -}
> >
> > /**
> > - * Get memory region (MR) <-> memory pool (MP) association from txq-
> >mp2mr[].
> > - * Add MP to txq->mp2mr[] if it's not registered yet. If mp2mr[] is
> > full,
> > - * remove an entry first.
> > + * Add memory region (MR) <-> memory pool (MP) association to txq-
> >mp2mr[].
> > + * If mp2mr[] is full, remove an entry first.
> > *
> > * @param txq
> > * Pointer to Tx queue structure.
> > * @param[in] mp
> > - * Memory pool for which a memory region lkey must be returned.
> > + * Memory pool for which a memory region lkey must be added
> > + * @param[in] i
> > + * Index in memory pool (MP) where to add memory region (MR)
> > *
> > * @return
> > - * mr->lkey on success, (uint32_t)-1 on failure.
> > + * Added mr->lkey on success, (uint32_t)-1 on failure.
> > */
> > -uint32_t
> > -mlx4_txq_mp2mr(struct txq *txq, struct rte_mempool *mp)
> > +uint32_t mlx4_txq_add_mr(struct txq *txq, struct rte_mempool *mp,
> > +uint32_t i)
> > {
> > - unsigned int i;
> > struct ibv_mr *mr;
> >
> > - for (i = 0; (i != RTE_DIM(txq->mp2mr)); ++i) {
> > - if (unlikely(txq->mp2mr[i].mp == NULL)) {
> > - /* Unknown MP, add a new MR for it. */
> > - break;
> > - }
> > - if (txq->mp2mr[i].mp == mp) {
> > - assert(txq->mp2mr[i].lkey != (uint32_t)-1);
> > - assert(txq->mp2mr[i].mr->lkey == txq-
> >mp2mr[i].lkey);
> > - return txq->mp2mr[i].lkey;
> > - }
> > - }
> > /* Add a new entry, register MR first. */
> > DEBUG("%p: discovered new memory pool \"%s\" (%p)",
> > (void *)txq, mp->name, (void *)mp); diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxtx.h b/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxtx.h index
> > e10bbca..719ef45 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxtx.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxtx.h
> > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> >
> > #include "mlx4.h"
> > #include "mlx4_prm.h"
> > +#include "mlx4_utils.h"
>
> Why?
>
> >
> > /** Rx queue counters. */
> > struct mlx4_rxq_stats {
> > @@ -160,7 +161,6 @@ void mlx4_rx_queue_release(void *dpdk_rxq);
> >
> > /* mlx4_rxtx.c */
> >
> > -uint32_t mlx4_txq_mp2mr(struct txq *txq, struct rte_mempool *mp);
> > uint16_t mlx4_tx_burst(void *dpdk_txq, struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
> > uint16_t pkts_n);
> > uint16_t mlx4_rx_burst(void *dpdk_rxq, struct rte_mbuf **pkts, @@
> > -169,6 +169,8 @@ uint16_t mlx4_tx_burst_removed(void *dpdk_txq,
> struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
> > uint16_t pkts_n);
> > uint16_t mlx4_rx_burst_removed(void *dpdk_rxq, struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
> > uint16_t pkts_n);
> > +uint32_t mlx4_txq_add_mr(struct txq *txq, struct rte_mempool *mp,
> > + unsigned int i);
> >
> > /* mlx4_txq.c */
> >
> > @@ -177,4 +179,52 @@ int mlx4_tx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> *dev, uint16_t idx,
> > const struct rte_eth_txconf *conf); void
> > mlx4_tx_queue_release(void *dpdk_txq);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * Get memory pool (MP) from mbuf. If mbuf is indirect, the pool from
> > +which
> > + * the cloned mbuf is allocated is returned instead.
> > + *
> > + * @param buf
> > + * Pointer to mbuf.
> > + *
> > + * @return
> > + * Memory pool where data is located for given mbuf.
> > + */
> > +static __rte_always_inline struct rte_mempool * mlx4_txq_mb2mp(struct
> > +rte_mbuf *buf) {
> > + if (unlikely(RTE_MBUF_INDIRECT(buf)))
> > + return rte_mbuf_from_indirect(buf)->pool;
> > + return buf->pool;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * Get memory region (MR) <-> memory pool (MP) association from txq-
> >mp2mr[].
> > + * Call mlx4_txq_add_mr() if MP is not registered yet.
> > + *
> > + * @param txq
> > + * Pointer to Tx queue structure.
> > + * @param[in] mp
> > + * Memory pool for which a memory region lkey must be returned.
> > + *
> > + * @return
> > + * mr->lkey on success, (uint32_t)-1 on failure.
> > + */
> > +static __rte_always_inline uint32_t
>
> Note __rte_always_inline is defined in rte_common.h and should be
> explicitly included (however don't do that, see below).
>
> > +mlx4_txq_mp2mr(struct txq *txq, struct rte_mempool *mp) {
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; (i != RTE_DIM(txq->mp2mr)); ++i) {
> > + if (unlikely(txq->mp2mr[i].mp == NULL)) {
> > + /* Unknown MP, add a new MR for it. */
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + if (txq->mp2mr[i].mp == mp) {
> > + assert(txq->mp2mr[i].lkey != (uint32_t)-1);
> > + assert(txq->mp2mr[i].mr->lkey == txq-
> >mp2mr[i].lkey);
>
> assert() requires assert.h (but don't include it, see subsequent suggestion).
>
> > + return txq->mp2mr[i].lkey;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + return mlx4_txq_add_mr(txq, mp, i);
> > +}
> > #endif /* MLX4_RXTX_H_ */
>
> So as described above, these functions do not need the __rte_always_inline,
> please remove it. They also do not need to be located in a header file; the
> reason it's the case for their mlx5 counterparts is that they have to be shared
> between vectorized/non-vectorized code. No such requirement here, you
> should move them back to their original spot.
>
Static function mlx4_txq_mp2mr() must be in a header file because it is shared by 2 files: mlx4_txq.c and mlx4_rxtx.c.
It is not related to vectorized/non-vectorized code in mlx5.
Having said that -__rte_always_inline is required as well otherwise compilation fails with
drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_rxtx.h:200:1: error: 'mlx4_txq_mp2mr' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
for files which include mlx4_rxtx.h
> My suggestion for this performance improvement is to move
> mlx4_txq_add_mr() to a different file, mlx4_mr.c looks like a good
> candidate. This fact will ensure it's never inlined and far away from the data
> path.
>
Function mlx4_txq_add_mr() is relatively small.
What do you say about preceding it with __attribute((noinline)) instead of creating a new file?
> --
> Adrien Mazarguil
> 6WIND
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-25 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1508752838-30408-1-git-send-email-ophirmu@mellanox.com>
2017-10-23 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/7] net/mlx4: follow-up on new TX datapath introduced in RC1 Ophir Munk
2017-10-23 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/7] net/mlx4: remove error flows from Tx fast path Ophir Munk
2017-10-25 16:49 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-23 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/7] net/mlx4: inline more Tx functions Ophir Munk
2017-10-25 16:49 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-25 21:42 ` Ophir Munk [this message]
2017-10-26 7:48 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-26 14:27 ` Ophir Munk
2017-10-29 19:30 ` Ophir Munk
2017-10-23 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/7] net/mlx4: save lkey in big-endian format Ophir Munk
2017-10-23 15:24 ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2017-10-23 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/7] net/mlx4: merge Tx path functions Ophir Munk
2017-10-24 13:51 ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2017-10-24 20:36 ` Ophir Munk
2017-10-25 7:50 ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2017-10-26 10:31 ` Matan Azrad
2017-10-26 12:12 ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2017-10-26 12:30 ` Matan Azrad
2017-10-26 13:44 ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2017-10-26 16:21 ` Matan Azrad
2017-10-23 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/7] net/mlx4: remove unnecessary variables in Tx burst Ophir Munk
2017-10-25 16:49 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-23 14:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/7] net/mlx4: improve performance of one Tx segment Ophir Munk
2017-10-25 16:50 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-23 14:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/7] net/mlx4: separate Tx for multi-segments Ophir Munk
2017-10-25 16:50 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-30 8:15 ` Ophir Munk
2017-10-30 10:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/7] Tx path improvements Matan Azrad
2017-10-30 10:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/7] net/mlx4: remove error flows from Tx fast path Matan Azrad
2017-10-30 14:23 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-30 18:11 ` Matan Azrad
2017-10-31 10:16 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-30 10:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/7] net/mlx4: associate MR to MP in a short function Matan Azrad
2017-10-30 14:23 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-31 13:25 ` Ophir Munk
2017-10-30 10:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/7] net/mlx4: merge Tx path functions Matan Azrad
2017-10-30 14:23 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-30 18:12 ` Matan Azrad
2017-10-30 10:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/7] net/mlx4: remove completion counter in Tx burst Matan Azrad
2017-10-30 14:23 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-30 10:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/7] net/mlx4: separate Tx segment cases Matan Azrad
2017-10-30 14:23 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-30 18:23 ` Matan Azrad
2017-10-31 10:17 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-30 10:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/7] net/mlx4: mitigate Tx path memory barriers Matan Azrad
2017-10-30 14:23 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-30 19:47 ` Matan Azrad
2017-10-31 10:17 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-31 11:35 ` Matan Azrad
2017-10-31 13:21 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-30 10:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/7] net/mlx4: remove empty Tx segment support Matan Azrad
2017-10-30 14:24 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-31 18:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/8] net/mlx4: Tx path improvements Matan Azrad
2017-10-31 18:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/8] net/mlx4: remove error flows from Tx fast path Matan Azrad
2017-10-31 18:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/8] net/mlx4: associate MR to MP in a short function Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 13:42 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-31 18:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/8] net/mlx4: fix ring wraparound compiler hint Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 13:42 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-31 18:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/8] net/mlx4: merge Tx path functions Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 13:42 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-31 18:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/8] net/mlx4: remove duplicate handling in Tx burst Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 13:42 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-31 18:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/8] net/mlx4: separate Tx segment cases Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 13:43 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-31 18:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/8] net/mlx4: fix HW memory optimizations careless Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 13:43 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-10-31 18:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 8/8] net/mlx4: mitigate Tx path memory barriers Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 13:43 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-11-02 13:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx4: fix missing include Adrien Mazarguil
2017-11-02 20:35 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-02 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/8] net/mlx4: Tx path improvements Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/8] net/mlx4: remove error flows from Tx fast path Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/8] net/mlx4: associate MR to MP in a short function Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/8] net/mlx4: fix ring wraparound compiler hint Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/8] net/mlx4: merge Tx path functions Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/8] net/mlx4: remove duplicate handling in Tx burst Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/8] net/mlx4: separate Tx segment cases Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/8] net/mlx4: fix HW memory optimizations careless Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 8/8] net/mlx4: mitigate Tx path memory barriers Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 17:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/8] net/mlx4: Tx path improvements Adrien Mazarguil
2017-11-02 20:35 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-02 20:41 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-03 9:48 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2017-11-03 19:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DB5PR05MB1254024B3918471086AC914DD1440@DB5PR05MB1254.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ophirmu@mellanox.com \
--cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=olgas@mellanox.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).