DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@nvidia.com>
To: Ivan Malov <Ivan.Malov@oktetlabs.ru>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,
	"andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>,
	"ferruh.yigit@intel.com" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"mohammad.abdul.awal@intel.com" <mohammad.abdul.awal@intel.com>,
	"qi.z.zhang@intel.com" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com" <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] ethdev: add async queue-based flow rules operations
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 01:10:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM5PR12MB24058D433C686A8D4F5233FFAFB79@DM5PR12MB2405.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23842a48-9278-c22c-276a-063edb4dd63a@oktetlabs.ru>

> From: Ivan Malov <Ivan.Malov@oktetlabs.ru> on Wednesday, October 6, 2021 12:25
> On 06/10/2021 07:48, Alexander Kozyrev wrote:
> > A new, faster, queue-based flow rules management mechanism is needed for
> > applications offloading rules inside the datapath. This asynchronous
> > and lockless mechanism frees the CPU for further packet processing and
> > reduces the performance impact of the flow rules creation/destruction
> > on the datapath. Note that queues are not thread-safe and queue-based
> > operations can be safely invoked without any locks from a single thread.
> >
> > The rte_flow_q_flow_create() function enqueues a flow creation to the
> > requested queue. It benefits from already configured resources and sets
> > unique values on top of item and action templates. A flow rule is enqueued
> > on the specified flow queue and offloaded asynchronously to the hardware.
> > The function returns immediately to spare CPU for further packet
> > processing. The application must invoke the rte_flow_q_dequeue() function
> > to complete the flow rule operation offloading, to clear the queue, and to
> > receive the operation status. The rte_flow_q_flow_destroy() function
> > enqueues a flow destruction to the requested queue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@nvidia.com>
> > Suggested-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >   lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h | 288
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 288 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > index ba3204b17e..8cdffd8d2e 100644
> > --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h
> > @@ -4298,6 +4298,13 @@ struct rte_flow_port_attr {
> >   	 * Version of the struct layout, should be 0.
> >   	 */
> >   	uint32_t version;
> > +	/**
> > +	 * Number of flow queues to be configured.
> > +	 * Flow queues are used for asyncronous flow rule creation/destruction.
> 
> Typo: asyncronous --> asynchronous
Thanks for noticing, will correct all the typos.

> > +	 * The order of operations is not guaranteed inside a queue.
> > +	 * Flow queues are not thread-safe.
> > +	 */
> > +	uint16_t nb_queues;
> >   	/**
> >   	 * Memory size allocated for the flow rules management.
> >   	 * If set to 0, memory is allocated dynamically.
> > @@ -4330,6 +4337,21 @@ struct rte_flow_port_attr {
> >   	uint32_t fixed_resource_size:1;
> >   };
> >
> > +/**
> > + * Flow engine queue configuration.
> > + */
> > +__extension__
> > +struct rte_flow_queue_attr {
> 
> Perhaps "struct rte_flow_queue_mode" or "struct rte_flow_queue_conf". I
> don't insist.
I would prefer sticking to attributes for consistency. We have them elsewhere.

> > +	/**
> > +	 * Version of the struct layout, should be 0.
> > +	 */
> > +	uint32_t version;
> > +	/**
> > +	 * Number of flow rule operations a queue can hold.
> > +	 */
> > +	uint32_t size;
> > +};
> > +
> >   /**
> >    * @warning
> >    * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
> > @@ -4346,6 +4368,8 @@ struct rte_flow_port_attr {
> >    *   Port identifier of Ethernet device.
> >    * @param[in] port_attr
> >    *   Port configuration attributes.
> > + * @param[in] queue_attr
> > + *   Array that holds attributes for each queue.
> 
> This should probably say that the number of queues / array size is taken
> from port_attr->nb_queues.
Good idea, will mention this.
> Also, consider "... for each flow queue".
Sounds good.

> >    * @param[out] error
> >    *   Perform verbose error reporting if not NULL.
> >    *   PMDs initialize this structure in case of error only.
> > @@ -4357,6 +4381,7 @@ __rte_experimental
> >   int
> >   rte_flow_configure(uint16_t port_id,
> >   		   const struct rte_flow_port_attr *port_attr,
> > +		   const struct rte_flow_queue_attr *queue_attr[],
> >   		   struct rte_flow_error *error);
> >
> >   /**
> > @@ -4626,6 +4651,269 @@ __rte_experimental
> >   int
> >   rte_flow_table_destroy(uint16_t port_id, struct rte_flow_table *table,
> >   		       struct rte_flow_error *error);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * Queue operation attributes
> > + */
> > +__extension__
> > +struct rte_flow_q_ops_attr {
> > +	/**
> > +	 * Version of the struct layout, should be 0.
> > +	 */
> > +	uint32_t version;
> > +	/**
> > +	 * The user data that will be returned on the completion.
> 
> Maybe "on completion events"?
Agree.

> > +	 */
> > +	void *user_data;
> > +	/**
> > +	 * When set, the requested action must be sent to the HW without
> > +	 * any delay. Any prior requests must be also sent to the HW.
> > +	 * If this bit is cleared, the application must call the
> > +	 * rte_flow_queue_flush API to actually send the request to the HW.
> 
> Not sure that I understand the "Any prior requests ..." part. If this
> structure configures operation mode for the whole queue and not for each
> enqueue request, then no "prior requests" can exist in the first place
> because each submission is meant to be immediately sent to the HW.
This structure configures attributes per single operation. 
User can send multiple operations without  "flush" attribute set to keep them in a queue.
Then it is possible to issue one operation with "flush" attribute set to purge the whole queue.
> But if this structure can vary across enqueue requests, then this
> documentation should be improved to say this clearly.
I'll try to make it clear that it is per-operation attributes indeed.


> > +	 */
> > +	uint32_t flush:1;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * @warning
> > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
> > + *
> > + * Enqueue rule creation operation.
> > + *
> > + * @param port_id
> > + *   Port identifier of Ethernet device.
> > + * @param queue
> > + *   Flow queue used to insert the rule.
> > + * @param[in] attr
> > + *   Rule creation operation attributes.
> 
> At a bare minimum, please consider renaming this to "queue_attr". More
> variants (see above): "queue_mode", "queue_conf". I suggest doing so to
> avoid confusion with "struct rte_flow_attr" which sits in "struct
> rte_flow_table_attr" in fact.
> If this structure must be exactly the same as the one used in
> rte_flow_configure(), please say so. If, however, this structure can be
> completely different on enqueue operations, then the argument name
> should indicate it somehow. Maybe, "override_queue_conf". Otherwise,
> it's unclear.
Sounds reasonable, will do. Although it is operation attributes, not the queue's ones.

> There are similar occurrences below.
> > + * @param[in] table
> > + *   Table to select templates from.
> 
> Perhaps "template_table"?
Noted.

> > + * @param[in] items
> > + *   List of pattern items to be used.
> > + *   The list order should match the order in the item template.
> > + *   The spec is the only relevant member of the item that is being used.
> > + * @param[in] item_template_index
> > + *   Item template index in the table.
> > + * @param[in] actions
> > + *   List of actions to be used.
> > + *   The list order should match the order in the action template.
> > + * @param[in] action_template_index
> > + *   Action template index in the table.
> > + * @param[out] error
> > + *   Perform verbose error reporting if not NULL.
> > + *   PMDs initialize this structure in case of error only.
> > + *
> > + * @return
> > + *   Handle on success, NULL otherwise and rte_errno is set.
> > + *   The rule handle doesn't mean that the rule was offloaded.
> > + *   Only completion result indicates that the rule was offloaded.
> > + */
> > +__rte_experimental
> > +struct rte_flow *
> > +rte_flow_q_flow_create(uint16_t port_id, uint32_t queue,
> > +		       const struct rte_flow_q_ops_attr *attr,
> > +		       const struct rte_flow_table *table,
> > +			   const struct rte_flow_item items[],
> > +		       uint8_t item_template_index,
> > +			   const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
> > +		       uint8_t action_template_index,
> > +		       struct rte_flow_error *error);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * @warning
> > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
> > + *
> > + * Enqueue rule destruction operation.
> > + *
> > + * This function enqueues a destruction operation on the queue.
> > + * Application should assume that after calling this function
> > + * the rule handle is not valid anymore.
> > + * Completion indicates the full removal of the rule from the HW.
> > + *
> > + * @param port_id
> > + *   Port identifier of Ethernet device.
> > + * @param queue
> > + *   Flow queue which is used to destroy the rule.
> > + *   This must match the queue on which the rule was created.
> > + * @param[in] attr
> > + *   Rule destroy operation attributes.
> > + * @param[in] flow
> > + *   Flow handle to be destroyed.
> > + * @param[out] error
> > + *   Perform verbose error reporting if not NULL.
> > + *   PMDs initialize this structure in case of error only.
> > + *
> > + * @return
> > + *   0 on success, a negative errno value otherwise and rte_errno is set.
> > + */
> > +__rte_experimental
> > +int
> > +rte_flow_q_flow_destroy(uint16_t port_id, uint32_t queue,
> > +			struct rte_flow_q_ops_attr *attr,
> > +			struct rte_flow *flow,
> > +			struct rte_flow_error *error);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * @warning
> > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
> > + *
> > + * Enqueue indirect rule creation operation.
> > + * @see rte_flow_action_handle_create
> 
> Why "indirect rule"? This API seems to enqueue an "indirect action"...
Thanks, will change to action.

> > + *
> > + * @param[in] port_id
> > + *   Port identifier of Ethernet device.
> > + * @param[in] queue
> > + *   Flow queue which is used to create the rule.
> > + * @param[in] attr
> > + *   Queue operation attributes.
> > + * @param[in] conf
> > + *   Action configuration for the indirect action object creation.
> 
> Perhaps "indir_conf" or "indir_action_conf"?
Ok.

> > + * @param[in] action
> > + *   Specific configuration of the indirect action object.
> > + * @param[out] error
> > + *   Perform verbose error reporting if not NULL.
> > + *   PMDs initialize this structure in case of error only.
> > + *
> > + * @return
> > + *   - (0) if success.
> > + *   - (-ENODEV) if *port_id* invalid.
> > + *   - (-ENOSYS) if underlying device does not support this functionality.
> > + *   - (-EIO) if underlying device is removed.
> > + *   - (-ENOENT) if action pointed by *action* handle was not found.
> > + *   - (-EBUSY) if action pointed by *action* handle still used by some rules
> > + *   rte_errno is also set.
> > + */
> > +__rte_experimental
> > +struct rte_flow_action_handle *
> > +rte_flow_q_action_handle_create(uint16_t port_id, uint32_t queue,
> > +				const struct rte_flow_q_ops_attr *attr,
> > +				const struct rte_flow_indir_action_conf *conf,
> > +				const struct rte_flow_action *action,
> > +				struct rte_flow_error *error);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * @warning
> > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change without prior notice.
> > + *
> > + * Enqueue indirect rule destruction operation.
> 
> Please see above. Did you mean "indirect action"?
Again, you are right, action is a better word here.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-13  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 218+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-06  4:48 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/3] ethdev: datapath-focused flow rules management Alexander Kozyrev
2021-10-06  4:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] ethdev: introduce flow pre-configuration hints Alexander Kozyrev
2021-10-13  4:11   ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-10-13 13:15     ` Ori Kam
2021-10-31 17:27       ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-11-01 10:40         ` Ori Kam
2021-10-06  4:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] ethdev: add flow item/action templates Alexander Kozyrev
2021-10-06 17:24   ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-13  1:25     ` Alexander Kozyrev
2021-10-13  2:26       ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-10-13  2:38         ` Alexander Kozyrev
2021-10-13 11:25       ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-06  4:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] ethdev: add async queue-based flow rules operations Alexander Kozyrev
2021-10-06 16:24   ` Ivan Malov
2021-10-13  1:10     ` Alexander Kozyrev [this message]
2021-10-13  4:57   ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-10-13 13:17     ` Ori Kam
2022-01-18 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] ethdev: datapath-focused flow rules management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-01-18 15:30   ` [PATCH v2 01/10] ethdev: introduce flow pre-configuration hints Alexander Kozyrev
2022-01-24 14:36     ` Jerin Jacob
2022-01-24 17:35       ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-01-24 17:46         ` Jerin Jacob
2022-01-24 18:08           ` Bruce Richardson
2022-01-25  1:14             ` Alexander Kozyrev
2022-01-25 15:58             ` Ori Kam
2022-01-25 18:09               ` Bruce Richardson
2022-01-25 18:14                 ` Bruce Richardson
2022-01-26  9:45                   ` Ori Kam
2022-01-26 10:52                     ` Bruce Richardson
2022-01-26 11:21                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-01-26 12:19                         ` Ori Kam
2022-01-26 13:41                           ` Bruce Richardson
2022-01-26 15:12                             ` Ori Kam
2022-01-24 17:40       ` Ajit Khaparde
2022-01-25  1:28         ` Alexander Kozyrev
2022-01-25 18:44           ` Jerin Jacob
2022-01-26 22:02             ` Alexander Kozyrev
2022-01-27  9:34               ` Jerin Jacob
2022-01-18 15:30   ` [PATCH v2 02/10] ethdev: add flow item/action templates Alexander Kozyrev
2022-01-18 15:30   ` [PATCH v2 03/10] ethdev: bring in async queue-based flow rules operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-01-18 15:30   ` [PATCH v2 04/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow configure Alexander Kozyrev
2022-01-18 15:33   ` [v2,05/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow item/action template Alexander Kozyrev
2022-01-18 15:34   ` [v2,06/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow table Alexander Kozyrev
2022-01-18 15:35   ` [v2,07/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow queue create flow Alexander Kozyrev
2022-01-18 15:35   ` [v2,08/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow queue drain Alexander Kozyrev
2022-01-18 15:36   ` [v2,09/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow queue dequeue Alexander Kozyrev
2022-01-18 15:37   ` [v2,10/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow queue indirect action Alexander Kozyrev
2022-01-19  7:16   ` [PATCH v2 00/10] ethdev: datapath-focused flow rules management Suanming Mou
2022-01-24 15:10     ` Ori Kam
2022-02-06  3:25   ` [PATCH v3 " Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-06  3:25     ` [PATCH v3 01/10] ethdev: introduce flow pre-configuration hints Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-07 13:15       ` Ori Kam
2022-02-07 14:52       ` Jerin Jacob
2022-02-07 17:59         ` Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-07 18:24           ` Jerin Jacob
2022-02-06  3:25     ` [PATCH v3 02/10] ethdev: add flow item/action templates Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-07 13:16       ` Ori Kam
2022-02-06  3:25     ` [PATCH v3 03/10] ethdev: bring in async queue-based flow rules operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-07 13:18       ` Ori Kam
2022-02-08 10:56       ` Jerin Jacob
2022-02-08 14:11         ` Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-08 15:23           ` Ivan Malov
2022-02-09  5:40             ` Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-08 17:36           ` Jerin Jacob
2022-02-09  5:50           ` Jerin Jacob
2022-02-06  3:25     ` [PATCH v3 04/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow configuration Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-07 13:19       ` Ori Kam
2022-02-06  3:25     ` [PATCH v3 05/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow template management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-07 13:20       ` Ori Kam
2022-02-06  3:25     ` [PATCH v3 06/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow table management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-07 13:22       ` Ori Kam
2022-02-06  3:25     ` [PATCH v3 07/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow queue flow operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-07 13:21       ` Ori Kam
2022-02-06  3:25     ` [PATCH v3 08/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow push operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-07 13:22       ` Ori Kam
2022-02-06  3:25     ` [PATCH v3 09/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow pull operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-07 13:23       ` Ori Kam
2022-02-06  3:25     ` [PATCH v3 10/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow queue indirect actions Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-07 13:23       ` Ori Kam
     [not found] <20220206032526.816079-1-akozyrev@nvidia.com >
2022-02-09 21:37 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] ethdev: datapath-focused flow rules management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-09 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 01/10] ethdev: introduce flow pre-configuration hints Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-09 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 02/10] ethdev: add flow item/action templates Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-09 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 03/10] ethdev: bring in async queue-based flow rules operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-09 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 04/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow configuration Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-10  9:32     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-02-09 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 05/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow template management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-09 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 06/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow table management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-09 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 07/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow queue flow operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-09 21:53     ` Ori Kam
2022-02-09 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 08/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow push operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-09 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 09/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow pull operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-09 21:38   ` [PATCH v4 10/10] app/testpmd: implement rte flow queue indirect actions Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-10 16:00   ` [PATCH v4 00/10] ethdev: datapath-focused flow rules management Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-10 16:12     ` Asaf Penso
2022-02-10 16:33       ` Suanming Mou
2022-02-10 18:04     ` Ajit Khaparde
2022-02-11 10:22     ` Ivan Malov
2022-02-11 10:48     ` Jerin Jacob
2022-02-11  2:26   ` [PATCH v5 " Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-11  2:26     ` [PATCH v5 01/10] ethdev: introduce flow pre-configuration hints Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-11 10:16       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-11 18:47         ` Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-16 13:03           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-16 22:17             ` Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-17 10:35               ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-17 10:57                 ` Ori Kam
2022-02-17 11:04                   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-11  2:26     ` [PATCH v5 02/10] ethdev: add flow item/action templates Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-11 11:27       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-11 22:25         ` Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-16 13:14           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-16 14:18             ` Ori Kam
2022-02-17 10:44               ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-17 11:11                 ` Ori Kam
2022-02-11  2:26     ` [PATCH v5 03/10] ethdev: bring in async queue-based flow rules operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-11 12:42       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-12  2:19         ` Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-12  9:25           ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-02-16 22:49             ` Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-17  8:18               ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-02-17 11:02                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-16 13:34           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-16 14:53             ` Ori Kam
2022-02-17 10:52               ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-17 11:08                 ` Ori Kam
2022-02-17 14:16                   ` Ori Kam
2022-02-17 14:34                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-02-16 15:15             ` Ori Kam
2022-02-17 11:10               ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-17 11:19                 ` Ori Kam
2022-02-11  2:26     ` [PATCH v5 04/10] app/testpmd: add flow engine configuration Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-11  2:26     ` [PATCH v5 05/10] app/testpmd: add flow template management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-11  2:26     ` [PATCH v5 06/10] app/testpmd: add flow table management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-11  2:26     ` [PATCH v5 07/10] app/testpmd: add async flow create/destroy operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-11  2:26     ` [PATCH v5 08/10] app/testpmd: add flow queue push operation Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-11  2:26     ` [PATCH v5 09/10] app/testpmd: add flow queue pull operation Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-11  2:26     ` [PATCH v5 10/10] app/testpmd: add async indirect actions creation/destruction Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-12  4:19     ` [PATCH v6 00/10] ethdev: datapath-focused flow rules management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-12  4:19       ` [PATCH v6 01/10] ethdev: introduce flow pre-configuration hints Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-12  4:19       ` [PATCH v6 02/10] ethdev: add flow item/action templates Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-12  4:19       ` [PATCH v6 03/10] ethdev: bring in async queue-based flow rules operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-12  4:19       ` [PATCH v6 04/10] app/testpmd: add flow engine configuration Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-12  4:19       ` [PATCH v6 05/10] app/testpmd: add flow template management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-12  4:19       ` [PATCH v6 06/10] app/testpmd: add flow table management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-12  4:19       ` [PATCH v6 07/10] app/testpmd: add async flow create/destroy operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-12  4:19       ` [PATCH v6 08/10] app/testpmd: add flow queue push operation Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-12  4:19       ` [PATCH v6 09/10] app/testpmd: add flow queue pull operation Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-12  4:19       ` [PATCH v6 10/10] app/testpmd: add async indirect actions creation/destruction Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-19  4:11       ` [PATCH v7 00/10] ethdev: datapath-focused flow rules management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-19  4:11         ` [PATCH v7 01/11] ethdev: introduce flow engine configuration Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-19  4:11         ` [PATCH v7 02/11] ethdev: add flow item/action templates Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-19  4:11         ` [PATCH v7 03/11] ethdev: bring in async queue-based flow rules operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-19  4:11         ` [PATCH v7 04/11] ethdev: bring in async indirect actions operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-19  4:11         ` [PATCH v7 05/11] app/testpmd: add flow engine configuration Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-19  4:11         ` [PATCH v7 06/11] app/testpmd: add flow template management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-19  4:11         ` [PATCH v7 07/11] app/testpmd: add flow table management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-19  4:11         ` [PATCH v7 08/11] app/testpmd: add async flow create/destroy operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-19  4:11         ` [PATCH v7 09/11] app/testpmd: add flow queue push operation Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-19  4:11         ` [PATCH v7 10/11] app/testpmd: add flow queue pull operation Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-19  4:11         ` [PATCH v7 11/11] app/testpmd: add async indirect actions operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-20  3:43         ` [PATCH v8 00/10] ethdev: datapath-focused flow rules management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-20  3:43           ` [PATCH v8 01/11] ethdev: introduce flow engine configuration Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21  9:47             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-21  9:52               ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-21 12:53                 ` Ori Kam
2022-02-21 14:33                   ` Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 14:53                   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-21 15:49                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-02-20  3:44           ` [PATCH v8 02/11] ethdev: add flow item/action templates Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 10:57             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-21 13:12               ` Ori Kam
2022-02-21 15:05                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-21 15:43                   ` Ori Kam
2022-02-21 15:14                 ` Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-20  3:44           ` [PATCH v8 03/11] ethdev: bring in async queue-based flow rules operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 14:49             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-21 15:35               ` Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-20  3:44           ` [PATCH v8 04/11] ethdev: bring in async indirect actions operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-20  3:44           ` [PATCH v8 05/11] app/testpmd: add flow engine configuration Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-20  3:44           ` [PATCH v8 06/11] app/testpmd: add flow template management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-20  3:44           ` [PATCH v8 07/11] app/testpmd: add flow table management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-20  3:44           ` [PATCH v8 08/11] app/testpmd: add async flow create/destroy operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-20  3:44           ` [PATCH v8 09/11] app/testpmd: add flow queue push operation Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-20  3:44           ` [PATCH v8 10/11] app/testpmd: add flow queue pull operation Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-20  3:44           ` [PATCH v8 11/11] app/testpmd: add async indirect actions operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 23:02           ` [PATCH v9 00/11] ethdev: datapath-focused flow rules management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 23:02             ` [PATCH v9 01/11] ethdev: introduce flow engine configuration Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 23:02             ` [PATCH v9 02/11] ethdev: add flow item/action templates Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 23:02             ` [PATCH v9 03/11] ethdev: bring in async queue-based flow rules operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 23:02             ` [PATCH v9 04/11] ethdev: bring in async indirect actions operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 23:02             ` [PATCH v9 05/11] app/testpmd: add flow engine configuration Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 23:02             ` [PATCH v9 06/11] app/testpmd: add flow template management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 23:02             ` [PATCH v9 07/11] app/testpmd: add flow table management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 23:02             ` [PATCH v9 08/11] app/testpmd: add async flow create/destroy operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 23:02             ` [PATCH v9 09/11] app/testpmd: add flow queue push operation Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 23:02             ` [PATCH v9 10/11] app/testpmd: add flow queue pull operation Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-21 23:02             ` [PATCH v9 11/11] app/testpmd: add async indirect actions operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-23  3:02             ` [PATCH v10 00/11] ethdev: datapath-focused flow rules management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-23  3:02               ` [PATCH v10 01/11] ethdev: introduce flow engine configuration Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-24  8:22                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-23  3:02               ` [PATCH v10 02/11] ethdev: add flow item/action templates Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-24  8:34                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-23  3:02               ` [PATCH v10 03/11] ethdev: bring in async queue-based flow rules operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-24  8:35                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-23  3:02               ` [PATCH v10 04/11] ethdev: bring in async indirect actions operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-24  8:37                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-02-23  3:02               ` [PATCH v10 05/11] app/testpmd: add flow engine configuration Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-23  3:02               ` [PATCH v10 06/11] app/testpmd: add flow template management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-23  3:02               ` [PATCH v10 07/11] app/testpmd: add flow table management Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-23  3:02               ` [PATCH v10 08/11] app/testpmd: add async flow create/destroy operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-23  3:02               ` [PATCH v10 09/11] app/testpmd: add flow queue push operation Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-23  3:02               ` [PATCH v10 10/11] app/testpmd: add flow queue pull operation Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-23  3:02               ` [PATCH v10 11/11] app/testpmd: add async indirect actions operations Alexander Kozyrev
2022-02-24 13:07               ` [PATCH v10 00/11] ethdev: datapath-focused flow rules management Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-24 13:13                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-24 13:14                   ` Raslan Darawsheh
2022-02-22 16:41           ` [PATCH v8 00/10] " Ferruh Yigit
2022-02-22 16:49             ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM5PR12MB24058D433C686A8D4F5233FFAFB79@DM5PR12MB2405.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=akozyrev@nvidia.com \
    --cc=Ivan.Malov@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=mohammad.abdul.awal@intel.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).